Auvik Network Management (ANM) Reviews

I work for an MSP, and what we do is work with different companies. We monitor all the networks. We have an integration with ConnectWise. We get to receive alerts directly to our ticketing system, and that is awesome. It saves us a lot of work. We don't have to have someone monitoring the networks 24/7. We receive the alerts in our queue and that expedites a lot of work.

The integration is the most important aspect of the solution. If it wasn't for the integration, we would have to have someone monitoring all those maps, all those locations, 24/7. However, with the integration, we see notifications directly to our ticket system, and that helps us a lot to streamline the workflow process. 

The fact that we get to see the whole network on a single pane of glass is great.  We have a map on our main screen, and we can see all the network devices and the end devices as well. It's very useful. 

It's easy to use. You can collapse things via buttons if you have too many devices visible on-screen. When you do that, it helps you see the bigger picture.

The interface is intuitive. I don't find it that difficult. 

We gain a real-time image of the network. 

Our team was able to realize the benefits of the solution pretty much right away. As soon as I was provided access, I was able to see if there were any failure points, and I could deal with them immediately. It's been a game-changer. 

The product has helped decrease our mean time to resolution. I have the option to access any network device if we have the credentials. It saves us a lot of time. I also do not have to have someone on-site. It helps expedite things.

We're able to spend less time on maintenance, setup, and issue resolution. 

It's not 100% user-friendly. However, it does offer a good balance. Still, if I wanted to add or change something, I'd have to think about how to do that.

It should be easier to see Mac addresses. I'd like to be able to see every Mac address of every device by just one-clicking on it.

I've been using the solution for seven months. 

The solution is generally stable. I've never experienced any crashes. 

The scalability is good. If you need to monitor more locations, it's pretty simple. 

I've never reached out to technical support in the past. 

I haven't previously used any other solution. 

The initial deployment is very easy. There's a step-by-step process that pretty much guides you through. We did have to do a few integrations before going fully operational. It took around 30 minutes to create a site integrated with ConnectWise and have the other connector up and running. 

We don't need maintenancevv on our end. The only maintenance happens when a device becomes disconnected. Then we would need to go and see what's going on. 

For this deployment, or whenever we are building up a new location, either myself or one of my co-workers, and someone on-site can handle the implementation. 

We had documentation in regards to integration with ConnectWise. I don't know if we had any other outside help. 

I don't have any visibility on the pricing. 

We're an MSP.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

There is a lot of documentation on the website, from my understanding, and it is very useful to navigate all that documentation before getting started. I'd advise new users to just try to get as informed as possible before starting to use the product.

As the IT manager for our two-building campus, I collaborate closely with our Managed Service Provider to leverage Auvik Network Management for comprehensive monitoring of our network infrastructure, including switches, firewalls, access points, and other typical small business network devices.

We chose Auvik Network Management to gain better visibility into our network, with real-time alerts for any device going offline, while also providing a centralized location for backing up all our device configurations.

While the dynamic map's initial behavior took some getting used to, the UI itself is fairly straightforward. Once I figured out the filters and other controls, I've found it to be quite user-friendly.

The clear network map with hover-over information for nodes and connections has been a big help. It not only visualizes the network layout but also provides details on how the connections function. Auvik's insights helped in pinpointing my VLAN misconfiguration earlier on, making troubleshooting a breeze.

Auvik offers a near real-time view of our network allowing me to diagnose traffic issues based on patterns or user reports. However, it seems Auvik double-counts traffic on our core switch's stacked lag links, making it unclear if we're seeing total traffic or just lag traffic. This is because Auvik reports on the virtual lag ports, their member interfaces, and the switch's stacking ports, which can sometimes be misleading when mixed with regular traffic data. Overall, Auvik is still helpful for monitoring historical traffic trends.

The network map and dashboard offer full visibility of our entire network's health, including any current issues thanks to the integrated central alarm station that displays known outages and potential problems.

While I wasn't involved in the initial deployment, Auvik is a significant improvement over my prior experience with open-source management platforms. It offers a much more centralized view, making it easier to see all devices and their connections.

Auvik allows us to spend less time on the setup, maintenance, and issue resolution. Pulling switch configurations simplifies tasks like replacing equipment or troubleshooting. Having the configuration readily available allows us to see things like traffic patterns, which can help pinpoint issues like port misconfigurations, without needing to delve into switch menus and trace information through tables.

I love that Auvik manages all of the credentials for me. It's incredibly convenient to have both SNMP monitoring and remote terminal access available through the web interface, no matter where I am. This gives me great visibility into my network devices.

It would be useful if network monitoring tools could differentiate between traffic on individual physical ports and traffic on logical interfaces like LAGs or bonded interfaces. Ideally, the tool would also recognize and remove duplicate traffic counts within the overall flow metrics. While solutions like Auvik might not currently offer this functionality, tools like NetBox can be helpful for documenting physical layer connections. It would be interesting to see if Auvik would consider incorporating features to document these physical layer details alongside the logical network configuration, especially for long-term network management within an organization. This could provide valuable insights into how physical infrastructure translates to network behavior.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for two and a half years.

Auvik Network Management is a reliable system with occasional minor login issues that occur infrequently.

Auvik has responded fairly well as we've made changes to our network, but we haven't grown rapidly enough to see it try to scale.

While I wasn't part of the initial network setup, I'm familiar with adding and modifying devices. Luckily, Auvik seems to catch these changes automatically.

Our Managed Service Provider used a consultant to implement Auvik for us.

I would rate Auvik Network Management eight out of ten.

Auvik is generally low-maintenance. While I occasionally verify switch imports and credentials when adding new devices, I haven't encountered any need for regular, active maintenance of the product itself.

Auvik Network Management offers filtering views and adjustable time scales, which are valuable features once you discover them. Additionally, you can manually add devices that the discovery tool misses, such as unmanaged switches, for full network visibility. This covers most of your visibility needs.

I work for an IT-managed service provider specializing in the medical field. We offer IT support to various healthcare organizations, including hospitals, urgent care centers, doctor's offices, and specialty clinics, with client sizes ranging from 50 to 500 computers. Auvik Network Management is a critical tool for us. It helps us discover network devices, stay on top of alerts, ensure proper backups, and locate specific devices when needed, allowing us to proactively manage our clients' IT infrastructure.

While the network map provides a valuable real-time view of our complex network with diverse clients, it's not easily interpretable for laypeople. However, for network specialists like myself, the map offers a clear picture of the network layout, device activity, and overall network health.

Auvik provides complete network visibility, which can be overwhelming for new users due to the detailed information presented. To address this, we typically install an office collector at potential client sites to gain a comprehensive understanding of their network before onboarding them. This approach has proven effective in giving us a clear picture of their IT infrastructure.

In the past, I lacked proper network management tools, and manually discovering devices was a time-consuming process that could lead to missed issues. Auvik's automatic discovery and management suite have significantly improved my productivity and effectiveness as a network administrator, even if it hasn't changed the entire company.

While we didn't realize the full potential of Auvik initially due to a rushed onboarding process, taking the time to set it up properly has revealed its true value. Now that we're utilizing its alerting, backup, and monitoring features, we're experiencing significant benefits, and I expect this value to keep increasing as we delve deeper into its capabilities.

Auvik significantly reduces our average time to resolve network incidents by allowing remote connection to devices without needing a VPN or on-site personnel. This can mean the difference between a ten-minute fix and a two-hour wait for someone to travel to the client's location. In applicable situations, Auvik has sped up our mean time to resolution.

The most valuable aspect of Auvik Network Management is its remote management capabilities. It allows us to access devices like firewalls and switches for our geographically dispersed clients without needing to be on-site or set up VPN connections, saving us significant time. Additionally, the automatic backups provide peace of mind by centralizing all our network device backups in one location, eliminating the need for manual backups.

Auvik's UI, while informative, can be a hurdle for new users due to its complexity. It offers a steep learning curve that necessitates extensive training for beginners. As someone who's been using it for nine months, I find it valuable, but it overwhelms my less experienced colleagues. While not a major issue, improving the UI's user-friendliness for beginners would be a welcome change.

The network map's user-friendliness is a seven out of ten. While it offers comprehensive information, it can be overwhelming at first glance due to the sheer amount of detail. However, the filtering system is excellent, allowing us to focus on the specific aspects we need once we get accustomed to it. Overall, the map excels at displaying network information, but initial filtering is necessary for a smooth experience.

While I find Auvik to be a valuable tool, it's not beginner-friendly enough for my tier-one technicians to use independently. Ideally, I would have liked a solution that could bridge the gap and lighten my load, but Auvik currently requires training and isn't easy to pick up for new users. Due to our busy schedules, we haven't been able to invest the time in training them yet, but I believe Auvik has the potential to be more user-friendly in the future.

While the support team was excellent, the onboarding process for Auvik felt overwhelming from the start. The sessions weren't very productive, leaving us to do much of the setup ourselves, which has delayed realizing the full value of the product.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for nine months.

Auvik's network management software has been stable for us, scoring a nine out of ten. The only occasional hiccups we've encountered stemmed from specific hardware integrations, not Auvik itself. We haven't needed to contact support until recently for these hardware-related issues. Overall, Auvik's stability has been good.

While the initial setup requires scheduling and on-site installation, Auvik scales very well as a platform. We are confident that as our company grows, Auvik will be able to keep pace with our increasing needs.

Auvik's technical support has been great. Despite rarely needing them, their responsiveness has been exceptional. Unlike many IT support experiences where tickets lead to long waits, Auvik consistently replies within an hour. Even when solutions weren't immediately found, their support team either asked insightful questions or promptly provided relevant documentation. My only minor complaint is the lack of phone support, which could be an issue in emergencies.

Positive

While installing Auvik itself wasn't complex, deploying it across 15 customers, some with multiple sites bringing the total to 30 to 40 physical locations, became a logistical challenge due to the time required for on-site installations. This highlights the advantage of cloud-based solutions in such scenarios. In short, the difficulty stemmed from the number of locations, not the installation process itself.

Nine months into the Auvik deployment, we're still working on logistics to ensure it reaches all our customers. While major customers are covered. Around 80 percent total, we haven't achieved full implementation across the board, meaning not all customers are utilizing all the management licenses and features.

Our 15-person IT team has collaboratively deployed the system. We've assigned engineers based on their area of expertise to ensure comprehensive coverage, though technically any one of us could handle the entire deployment, albeit over a much longer timeframe.

While Auvik offered onboarding and deployment sessions initially, they weren't helpful for our specific needs. We already had the information provided, and deployment wasn't adequately addressed. Now we're refocusing our collaboration with the onboarding team on best practices, particularly alert configurations. The default settings trigger excessive alerts for minor issues, overwhelming us. We're working with them to find the right balance and hold monthly meetings to refine our alerting system. This second round of collaboration with Auvik is proving more productive than the first.

I would rate Auvik Network Management eight out of ten.

The only maintenance required is to ensure the on-premise component has internet connection. Other than that, Auvik does not require any maintenance.

My most important advice is to prioritize a significant upfront investment in time for setup and onboarding. In hindsight, we would have benefitted from fully implementing and onboarding everything at the beginning, rather than a piecemeal approach. So, even though it will be time-consuming, take the plunge and fully implement the system across all your sites from the outset. This will allow you to reap the full benefits and boost your productivity from day one.

Our corporation, headquartered in Ohio, operates across 36 locations in the United States and Canada under various brand names. These locations fall under different business segments: Roto Molding (Washington, Colorado, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio), Injection Molding and Plastics (Ohio, Missouri), Blow Molding (Oklahoma, Toronto), and Distribution (California, Utah, Texas, Central America, Massachusetts).

To manage this geographically dispersed network, we leverage Auvik. With a central data center in Atlanta and a backup in Houston, all locations are connected via SD-WAN. Auvik scans and tracks assets across all sites, notifying us of critical device outages, new device detections, configuration changes on network equipment (switches, routers, firewalls), and bandwidth or internet disruptions. Our main location acts as the master site, with individual locations as sub-sites. User access varies, with some having read-only privileges for specific segments and others having broader visibility. Importantly, during acquisitions, we deploy a new collector at the acquired site to scan their network before integration, allowing us to map their infrastructure before moving forward. With an active acquisition strategy of at least one per year, this process is crucial for seamless integration.

A standout feature of Auvik is its real-time network mapping. It provides a comprehensive overview but also allows for granular filtering. We can easily focus on specific elements, like only switches, their wireless access points, or even all wireless devices, making it an invaluable tool for network management.

The network map can get cluttered with information, but fortunately, it offers pre-filtered views and allows custom filtering as well. Many users might not be aware of this and might be struggling with the initial complexity. However, the ability to filter the view down to the most relevant details makes the overall functionality quite useful. I appreciate that the map provides a comprehensive view initially, while also empowering users to customize it for their needs.

The benefits of Auvik were clear from the start. Adding sites was a breeze, and the excellent training courses quickly got me up to speed. Since then, I've been using Auvik regularly, particularly to locate printers and conveniently connect to their web interfaces directly within the platform. It's a valuable tool for these tasks and more.

Auvik has significantly improved our mean time to resolution. Alerts ensure we're notified immediately of any downtime, and Auvik's centralized view of the network allows us to quickly diagnose issues. Furthermore, Auvik streamlines troubleshooting by enabling remote configuration of devices, saving valuable time in resolving problems.

Auvik allows us to spend less time on setup, maintenance, and issue resolution.

Auvik stands out for its user-friendly interface and its comprehensive configuration management features. I particularly appreciate the automated backup of configurations, centralized Syslog collection, and configuration comparison tool. This last feature allows us to easily see highlighted changes between previous and current configurations on switches, firewalls, and routers, which is invaluable for change management and understanding who made what modifications.

While Auvik excels in network management with a user-friendly interface, its customization and reporting features could benefit from improvement. Specifically, allowing more control over SNMP scans, like setting custom drive space alert thresholds instead of pre-defined values, would enhance flexibility. Similarly, the ability to tailor reports would be valuable. In contrast, PRTG shines in endpoint monitoring and alerting for servers due to its high level of customization. Lansweeper offers a wider range of reports, including custom and pre-configured options, making it a strong choice for detailed reporting needs. Overall, if Auvik could address these areas, it would solidify its position as a comprehensive network management solution.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for one year.

Auvik Network Management has been mostly reliable for us. While there have been a few outages, they haven't caused any major disruptions. My biggest concern was with occasional false positives, where devices were incorrectly identified as offline, then deleted and rediscovered. This caused some issues, but I recall receiving Auvik notifications about the problem, and it seems to be resolved now. Overall, things have been much smoother since then.

One of the key benefits of Auvik Network Management is its scalability. When we acquire a new site, setting up a collector and integrating it into the system is a breeze. Scanning and adding new sites is a smooth process. Currently, with two main collectors handling most of our locations, adding a third one seems unnecessary. However, as we continue to grow, strategically placing a third collector, potentially within the data center, might become beneficial.

The technical support team was both responsive and knowledgeable. While their answers on some of our tickets regarding server alert customization weren't always what we'd hoped for, it's understandable since this product isn't designed for server monitoring. After all, our billing isn't for network equipment. Overall, I was impressed with their support aside from these customization limitations.

Positive

Our IT toolset currently includes PRTG, Lansweeper, Wazuh, and Auvik. While consolidating everything into a single, unified solution might be ideal, we've discovered valuable functionalities within each of these existing tools. Therefore, we haven't replaced any and now manage four tools in total. Perhaps a single, all-encompassing tool will emerge in the future, but for now, this multi-tool approach is working effectively.

We realized the advantages of Auvik much quicker than with PRTG, Lansweeper, and Wazuh. This is due to Auvik's user-friendly interface, which is significantly easier to navigate than those of its competitors. While competing products offer greater customization, they are often more complex to set up and use. Auvik excels at guiding users, but this can come at the cost of some customization options. Once familiar with the software, customization in Auvik becomes slightly more challenging compared to some competitors, however, it remains the most user-friendly option.

The initial setup was straightforward and took a couple of months to complete. Five people from our end were involved with the deployment.

We worked with Auvik directly in the engagement team. And then our infrastructure team was primarily involved with getting it deployed.

Auvik's pricing structure is a perk. You only pay for the network devices you manage, like firewalls, routers, and switches. Computers, access points, and other devices Auvik scans are not billed. While their pricing aligns with competitors, the benefit of having these additional devices monitored for free makes Auvik a compelling option.

I would rate Auvik Network Management eight out of ten.

In addition to our participation in the beta program for endpoint monitoring which hasn't been a major focus yet, we're constantly on the lookout for a unified solution. Ideally, this unicorn product would offer everything we need – reporting, scanning detection, and alerting. Currently, we rely on a patchwork of tools like Auvik, PRTG, Lansweeper, and Wazuh. While consolidating everything into one solution might be wishful thinking, Auvik's feature set is particularly impressive, and we hope it might eventually encompass all our needs.

While our infrastructure division within IT restricts access to Auvik for entry-level technicians, we do provision read-only access to some other tools. For example, the information security department can view network maps and devices within these tools, which likely aids their visualization of our network connectivity. Overall, Auvik access is limited for most first-level technicians.

We use it to monitor the network infrastructure and assets of our clients. We are a managed service provider and it fits neatly into our role. We also use it to keep configuration change records, which is something we didn't have before. It's nice to have that in one platform.

When we are onboarding a new client with network infrastructure for monitoring, Auvik makes it very straightforward and simplified. It can map out and easily visualize the customer's network so that we don't have to manually do it. It definitely has increased automation.

We used PRTG but it lacked the mapping function to visualize the network with an interactive map. It also lacked the configuration backup tool, the hardware life cycle, and good NetFlow insights. Moving to Auvik has saved a good 30 to 50 percent of our time.

Another thing that I love that Auvik does and that PRTG doesn't do is the integration with a lot of our MSP tools like ConnectWise and Teams. PRTG would open tickets via an alert, but it would never close them if the alert cleared. All those tickets from PRTG would go to me and I would have to manually close them. I would get inundated with tickets. Auvik will also open a ticket but, once the alert clears, it will automatically close the ticket, saving me from having to close a lot of tickets. That too has reduced repetitive work for me by 30 to 50 percent.

Our MTTR has almost been automated because of the tickets. About 90 percent of our tickets have been automated. I still have to manually look at the rest and maybe do a little work against them, but it's not crazy. It has unquestionably helped out with resolving issues.

It has also helped tremendously with quarterly business reviews because, with just a click of a button, we can get the hardware life cycle and export all the data to an Excel spreadsheet. That helps our management.

And because most of our clients are remote from us, that visibility that Auvik gives into their environments is in a better overall layout than our previous platform. The UI of PRTG was very '90s-esque, like a poorly designed website. It had the functionality but the UI was lacking tremendously when it comes to ease of use and organization.

The visibility Auvik provides almost makes it so that we don't have to be actively monitoring things. We don't need a NOC or a SOC to get alerts. We're more confident now in the network management solution that we have. Before, we were getting alert upon alert and my phone would be blowing up and then I would get all the tickets. Auvik has put that kind of stress on the back burner.

Overall, it has freed up about 25 to 30 percent of the time I used to have to put into things.

Another advantage is that I didn't want to show a junior tech our previous platform because they wouldn't know what to do with it. Auvik, on the other hand, is more geared toward all levels, rather than just the high-level engineers. It will tell you what might be the cause of a problem rather than just alerting on something that it sees. While we don't have it geared toward our lower-level team yet, it's very easy to use and they should be able to pick it up.

Among the most valuable features are the hardware life cycle and configuration backups, when applicable, since that's not applicable for all vendors, platforms, and networking types. When it does show you the hardware life cycle for, say, a Cisco device and the configuration backup, that's the most useful aspect for me as a network engineer.

Once it's set up properly with the SNMP strings or credentials, it's very straightforward to use. It has a small learning curve, which is nice for a network monitoring tool. Ease of use is very high on our list of requirements, not just for me as a network engineer, but when I want the help desk or the level-ones to be able to look at something. It needs to be easy to use.

It's also very much a single pane of glass, which is especially helpful for our business model as an MSP.

In addition, I greatly appreciate Auvik's ability to visualize network mapping. It's very good for visualizing how the network is formed and the interconnections. Since it's interactive, it's more helpful than a static map or static video diagram. It's a very helpful feature.

I like how you can request features, and one feature that I think they're working on is the ability to export the topology map as a video.

Something else I would like to see would be additional vendors for the hardware life cycle. Right now, they mainly focus on Cisco stuff, which is fine, but not every customer we have uses Cisco. I'm not looking for them to add every networking vendor, and these just might be legacy devices, but Fortinet is a big one that we've used and I don't think Auvik has the hardware life cycle for that. I don't know how it does on Aruba, but we have some legacy HPE as well. I do like the Meraki integration, although it would be nice to see a Juniper Mist and Aruba Central integration.

Another improvement that would be nice, one that should be at the top of their list, is the ability to properly identify vulnerabilities, based on a vendor's security alerts. If it could recognize, "You're on this version of firmware and you're hitting these types of vulnerabilities," that would definitely check off a big security feature for this tool.

We demoed Auvik early in the year and we fully signed up sometime in the summer, so we have been using it for several months.

Overall, it is very stable. 

Every platform or NMS has its own quirks or kinks that have to be worked out, but it's nice that Auvik will update on the backend. I don't have to worry about updating a server platform.

Its scalability is very high. It gets a 10 out of 10.

We have Auvik across multiple organizations. We monitor, administer, and maintain, network monitoring for dozens of clients. It's deployed across all their different environments and in organizations with multiple branch offices. Our clients include the smallest, one-branch organizations up to medium-to-large enterprises. It definitely fits all those use cases.

The technical support that Auvik provides is very good. They're very quick to respond. They have a live chat feature, which is very nice. They're pretty knowledgeable since it's their product. There's no comparison between the support from Auvik and the support we received from our previous vendor.

Positive

We used PRTG before and we're still using it now. We're trying to slowly migrate from it. We put all our eggs in that basket, even though it was a very flimsy basket. We used it for networking servers, mainly.

We didn't use it for endpoint and computer assets. That was handled by ConnectWise Automate. We wouldn't want Auvik to do that.

The deployment was very straightforward because of the user interface. This is where it's more straightforward than Domotz. Sometimes, when you have too many choices, it can be a burden. With Auvik you decide: Do you want the OVA? Do you want to install a .exe? It's very simple. I could probably have someone on our level-one team actually set it up.

It took less than 10 to 15 minutes after the collector was implemented before the network mapping started to populate with basic devices. Then it was a matter of fine-tuning. It was up to me to categorize devices as I saw fit and tune the SNMP so that it got the data that I wanted.

Overall, our implementation of Auvik took a few weeks because of the number of sites and devices and the fine-tuning. Also, an NMS is always being worked on. You're rarely perfectly happy with how it looks. It's constantly being fine-tuned so that alerts generate correctly without over-alerting.

That's one thing I have liked compared to PRTG. Auvik's out-of-the-box alerting is very straightforward and handles the alerts you are likely to see. But that's also where it could do a little bit better, in the customization of alerts. With PRTG, we could alert on almost anything, whereas with Auvik, you're somewhat zoned in.

We have definitely saved a good amount of time on the setup of Auvik, compared to PRTG. PRTG was significantly cheaper, but there was no onboarding help. It was a matter of, "Here you go, do it yourself." Auvik had a customer success team to walk us through and help iron out any kinks, which was greatly appreciated. That was part of what we're paying for. The pricing helps with support. PRTG's support, while it was okay, wasn't as straightforward and easy to get a hold of someone compared to Auvik.

The maintenance involved with Auvik is around fine-tuning for data collection, but it does not involve updating the agent or the backend. It's nice that I don't have to worry about updating the platform itself. I just have to worry about the data getting collected and making sure SNMP strings are updated.

I was the only one involved in the initial deployment, from our side.

I didn't set up PRTG but compared to my brief time with PRTG, Auvik has been night and day and the value has been very quick. For some of our customers, we never had a solution in place to back up configurations. Auvik now provides that. There's definitely peace of mind knowing a config backed up. It is definitely proving its value.

I don't think Auvik's pricing should be based on device, which it is right now. I don't know what their market share is or how they compete with Domotz, but if they want to stay competitive, Auvik should have simpler pricing. Domotz is $21 per month per site, whereas Auvik is per device, so it definitely adds up very quickly.

In addition to the other issues I mentioned, Auvik and our previous platform are night and day in the following way as well. We would almost be scared to put in a subnet for PRTG to scan because we wouldn't know what we got. Now, it's easy to see what we're getting in terms of the devices and prune it from there. 

It's also helpful that it's not onsite because we're trying to move servers and services off-prem. Auvik is definitely a step in the right direction. It's one less piece of infrastructure to worry about. You don't have to open up your environment to collect monitoring information. It just needs outbound traffic, which makes things easier. That's where it shines compared to an on-prem solution. Also, you don't have to maintain or update software or the agent. It does that automatically. I don't have to worry about updating firmware.

With an on-prem solution, everything is hub and spoke and everything has to go back to our data center. Auvik, as a cloud solution, eases up on that usage of our circuits and internet.

While Auvik is geared toward network infrastructure for an MSP, it could probably do a little bit better on the server side. PRTG definitely had that as an advantage over Auvik. It could monitor servers and that type of infrastructure better than Auvik can. 

Auvik also doesn't have some customizable automations for a specific use case that might need an if-then-that statement to run a script or commands. That might be very niche, but one of our clients is using PRTG like that. 

It is nice to see that Auvik has an expanding roadmap. I don't know what PRTG has on its roadmap for new features, but it's nice to see that Auvik is not getting stale.

I did evaluate Domotz and the pricing worked out in favor of Domotz, but we ended up going with Auvik. We're only in Auvik for a year and we'll see how it goes, but unless the pricing becomes too high, I don't see us moving away from it. Domotz was the only other one that was within reach and more geared toward MSPs.

An MSP business can almost flip a coin between Domotz and Auvik. Auvik is priced per device, whereas Domotz is priced per location or site. It works out in Domotz's favor, although I can't speak for its feature sets. Domotz does have a leg up in terms of deployability. It has a hardware appliance, almost like a Raspberry Pi, so it's easy to deploy on anyone's network, whereas you have to run Auvik as a virtual appliance. It can't run on ARM, which is not a deal-breaker, but it is nice to have options when deploying. You're somewhat locked in with Auvik for deployment because you need to run it on a server or in someone's vCenter. It's not that customizable, whereas Domotz can run on ARM as well, I believe.

Auvik has two versions, Essentials and Performance, which is similar to Domotz's model. With Performance you get NetFlow visibility and another feature and that increases the price per device. But the device types they charge for are only those that are part of network infrastructure. Overall, it's probably cheaper via Domotz, but if you have a lot of sites with just one device, it might be cheaper to go with Auvik. Auvik doesn't charge for access points, but they do charge for switches, routers, and firewalls.

Auvik definitely helps keep device inventories up to date. If I have the scan running, it does a really good job of finding devices on the network when the subnets are put in. However, the network infrastructure shouldn't change that much, so I don't typically have it running scans all the time. We're mainly using it for network infrastructure and not as much for endpoint devices. It primarily shines when it comes to network infrastructure, but it did do a pretty good job of doing the initial inventory of the networks.

My advice would be to do a proof of concept if you are in an MSP role or organization, because the costs can quickly add up.

We use it for insight into an entire network, all the devices on it, and for monitoring their health. We also have it hooked into our ticketing system for automated ticket generation from any of the devices that we need to manage.

The benefit is the ability to monitor and react to issues on devices that we manage. I've existed in this organization for eight years and it has scaled up tremendously. That wouldn't have been possible without a tool like this. That has been the most powerful part, the ability to scale up an organization from managing a couple of hundred endpoints to tens of thousands of endpoints.

It also definitely clears out a lot of repetitive tasks, reducing them by between 20 and 30 percent. It helps us attend to issues much faster, scaling up the availability of our entire team by a lot. They're not spending time doing things that are manual and unnecessary anymore. Our team is 10 percent more available. And with Auvik, there has clearly been a reduction in our MTTR, in the 20 to 30 percent range.

Another advantage is the visibility our IT team has into remote and distributed networks. That's pretty important, although it depends on who we're talking about on the team. It primarily impacts the more senior network engineers. It's definitely helpful for them. So the importance of the visibility it provides, overall, is somewhere in the middle range.

It's helpful for delegating low-level tasks to junior staff. They don't have to have the education that would typically be necessary for understanding individual products. It does some of the heavy lifting for them and presents things in an easy-to-understand way for someone who is not necessarily as technically inclined as they would otherwise have to be. There are a lot of tasks that we wouldn't give to our junior techs if we didn't have a tool like Auvik.

And the fact that it keeps our device inventories up to date saves us time. That's a use case I didn't mention, but it's a huge piece of what we use Auvik for.

I like the user interface and the fact that it generates a map automatically of any network that you are trying to manage. That's pretty valuable, as is the ability to hook it into all the devices and keep an eye on their health.

It's a really useful tool for visualizing network topology mapping. When I first started using it, it definitely wasn't as powerful as it is now. There were some issues with it performance-wise and with how it mapped things, but now it's become very useful, with a very accurate visualization of what's occurring on a system or network.

It also has a single web console and it integrates with other tools. That's very important because it's pretty cumbersome when you have a bunch of consoles that you need to go to. Being able to narrow it down to as few consoles as possible is definitely paramount.

It's very intuitive. It does a good job of showing you individual nodes on the network and their relative positions to one another, with pertinent details on each node, all in one location. And it provides easy accessibility to drill down into each node and get more specifics on them.

There is some difficulty using the monitoring and management functions of Auvik. If I were to rate it out of 10, I would say it's a seven or eight, on the "difficulty" scale, to set it up properly and in a way that's useful. It's not outside of a normal difficulty range for a tool like this, but there is definitely an amount of overhead required there.

The user interface could be tweaked in a few different ways to make it a little bit more intuitive when it comes to navigating through the menus. 

Also, getting remotely connected to managed devices could be a little bit smoother. Sometimes, it's a little bit cumbersome trying to do that. If they could streamline the facilitating of remote connections to network devices, that would be an improvement.

I've been using Auvik for about six years.

I've only had a few hiccups here and there. The stability is an eight or a nine out of 10. It has been pretty reliable.

It has really done great in scaling up according to our needs.

In the company that I'm with now, we have it deployed in up to a couple of thousand networks and to a lot of different devices. I don't know what the specific device count is because we've come to a point where we've handed that off to a specific automation team that is there to manage Auvik and a couple of our other tools. There is a lot in our Auvik system right now.

I've had contact with their technical support multiple times. I would rate them an eight out of 10.

Positive

We used multiple applications for managing our networks, or no applications at all, which was something of a mess. It's definitely helpful to unify a lot of different tools in one spot. Switching to Auvik has saved us 15 percent of our time.

Because Auvik is ubiquitous, it's useful for a lot of different network devices. Before we had a tool like Auvik, I'm not even sure that a tool like this existed in the managed services industry. We would use either the vendor-supplied tools for managing specific vendor network devices or something muddled together out of Microsoft's software, like Excel or Access, to try to manage everything.

Overall, the setup is pretty straightforward. It's just time-consuming to get it set up to a point where it's maximally functional. It's not complex, though.

We're continuously rolling it out to clients as we pull new clients in and build out new networks. Once the Auvik code is implemented, the amount of time it takes before network mapping starts to populate depends completely on the network side. It has varied over the last six years that I've been using it, but it doesn't take longer than I would have expected.

I've seen value in the product, absolutely. I don't think that we could operate as a business on the level that we do without something like Auvik. It's done what we needed to do and it hasn't caused us any reason to start looking for any other solution to replace it.

When comparing network monitoring solutions, if there is concern about pricing you really need to assess where you're at in your company and decide how much value a platform like this would bring to you. Sometimes, it's not always apparent how much time you're actually spending on the types of tasks and functions that Auvik can provide. 

Check the knowledge base articles because they're very helpful, and don't be afraid to use the forums as well because the people are very responsive there.

We use Auvik Network Management to monitor the environment, anything connected to the network, access points, switches, firewalls, and absolutely everything that lives in the Network. We also use it to set up alerts, which is the biggest use case. So whenever something goes down, we can set up Auvik to send pings to anything to monitor the behavior.

We had some customers that whenever something went down, such as any appliance or server going offline, we did not have something in place to let us know that the platform or device was offline. So, the main goal of implementing Auvik was to be able to set up alerts and monitor everything that we can. It is mostly network-related, but we also use it for items like servers, appliances, computers, and anything we can.

Auvik provides an intuitive interface that supports ease of use. It helps me rectify issues. The platform first identifies whenever something is down, malfunctioning, or lost connection. Auvik also helps us get the information for whatever went down, like serial numbers, makes, models, or anything else, so that we can get that as well. And we can also monitor the life of the devices. So once something goes on, we are aware of it right away, and we can make changes or anything that we need right away. When something comes up again, we can take immediate action.

Auvik's network map and dashboards provide a real-time picture of our network. When we have difficulties gaining real-time network visibility, we lack the necessary credentials. With the proper credentials, it is easy to map the entire network using Auvik. It is an intuitive platform. It's not that complicated to learn how to use it. Of course, it has a lot of features. However, once we have some knowledge, which is something we like because sometimes we hire tier-one people with no or little experience. The good thing is that people without experience can learn quickly how to use Auvik because it's not complicated.

We have customers whose priority is keeping the network up and running. When we have the first conversations with them, when we try to onboard a customer, one of the most important things for them is that we can monitor the network so that we can make sure that their users are working and will continue working without any downtime. That is important to a lot of our customers. So when we offer our services, one of the best things that we offer is that, and that is thanks to Auvik because that's the tool that we use. Auvik has helped us improve what we offer our customers, and they like how it works.

Auvik has empowered our entry-level technicians to solve more tickets independently. Because the portal is frequently used, our tier ones can familiarize themselves easily. They see how to monitor and troubleshoot. Auvik offers good training and certification, which we then offer to our employees.

For customers who don't have Auvik, the resolution time is one or two hours. But for customers with Auvik, it comes down to 20 to 30 minutes.

Auvik has saved our technicians around 30 hours per week.

Auvik allows us to spend less time setting up and maintaining the solution and more time resolving issues. It also allows us to identify the issue rapidly.

Auviks' automation capabilities assist us in automating the alerts that come through. They come through a ticketing system, and we set up automatic responses. So whenever an alert comes from x company, it automatically emails all contact points. It comes to me. It goes to any personal interest that needs to be aware of the situation in the company. It helps us automate the alert process so we are aware of an issue and can work on it.

Auvik has enhanced our network security and response time to network issues. 

I find Auvik's intuitive interface a welcome change from the complex network management platforms I've used. The platform's ease of use and extensive customization options for alert triggers are valuable features.

I know there's a way to use Auvik with machines instead of a computer with the agent. There's a way that we could use machines on the location. I want to add those options to improve Auvik because its offers are slightly more limited. So, for example, in our case, we use Auvik by installing the agent on my computer and then connecting that computer to the network at our client's offices. And there's another way where the client does not want to pay for a computer and does not have that network for us to connect. There's another agent option that Auvik offers, which uses the computers that are on the location as the agent. But the options we have there are limited to what we can do and see, so if it's possible to improve that a little bit, that will be good.

If such functionality is supported, it would be beneficial to leverage Auvik's capabilities to monitor Group Policy Objects on our servers.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for two years.

Auvik is stable. We have not had any unexpected outages. They also keep their customers informed by providing advance notice for any planned maintenance.

I would rate the scalability of Auvik Network Management ten out of ten.

While Auvik's technical support has been generally good, there have been a few instances where resolution times were longer than ideal.

Positive

In my previous role, I worked with several products, including Datto, ManageEngine, and Datadog. ManageEngine was particularly challenging due to its lack of user-friendliness. New hires consistently struggled to navigate the platform, requiring extensive training. Thankfully, this isn't the case with Auvik. Additionally, Datto and Datadog offered subpar support and documentation, making troubleshooting difficult. Reliable support and clear documentation are crucial for our team and heavily influence our software selections.

The deployment is straightforward and takes 30 minutes to set up, create the site, and deploy Auvik. One person is enough to deploy Auvik.

Auvik saves our technicians hours of work. When technicians had to spend an hour and a half or two hours solving an issue, they could now solve it faster with Auvik. So, ticket resolution time goes down. That improves our customer service and satisfaction, and the technicians do not spend an extra hour doing that.

The price for Auvik is affordable.

I would rate Auvik Network Management nine out of ten.

We have a team that monitors the Auvik alerts.

We have around 25 people in our organization that have access to Auvik.

Our clients range from small to enterprise level and vary in industry.

No maintenance is required for Auvik.

I strongly recommend Auvik for network management. To get the most out of it, ensure you have all device credentials beforehand, including access points and switches. While I'd love to offer it to all clients for free, the benefits - including reduced workload for myself and my team - make it a worthwhile investment, even if there's a cost involved.

Our company develops its own software solutions and prioritizes user safety, particularly in Europe, where we focus on compliance and education regarding student protection online. This includes content like radicalization, drug exposure, and self-harm. To ensure our own SaaS-based service, offered in both Europe and the US, functions optimally, we utilize Auvik for infrastructure monitoring.

A major challenge has been keeping our on-call teams engaged. Previously, our lack of automation meant that someone had to wake up in the middle of the night to check tickets and logs, ensuring everything was running smoothly. However, Auvik's automation and reporting features have transformed our process. Now, we only get woken up proactively when something actually goes wrong, thanks to Auvik leveraging other tools in conjunction with its own functionalities. This has significantly improved our on-call experience.

Our network management solution, Auvik, is deployed across a hybrid cloud environment. We utilize a mix of cloud providers, including AWS in the UK and Canada, DigitalOcean in the UK, Amsterdam, Germany, France, India, Singapore, San Francisco, Virginia, and Toronto, and four of our own data centers located in the UK, North America, and Amsterdam.

Real-time network visibility was a key factor in choosing Auvik, made possible by its helpful network mapping. While we previously relied on other, more cumbersome software, Auvik's ease of use is a game-changer. Onboarding new employees takes just 20 minutes thanks to the intuitive interface. In contrast, our prior system required countless documents for even basic tasks like adding or removing a host or checking resource utilization. Thankfully, Auvik's intuitive design streamlines these processes.

Since implementing Auvik in April, we've only had one incident, which Auvik fortunately caught in real-time. We received notification within 40 seconds of the event, allowing us to swiftly address it. As the COO responsible for service delivery, I'm impressed. Previously, such issues might have gone unnoticed until the morning. Thankfully, with Auvik, we were up and running within five minutes, and full resolution followed shortly after. In essence, Auvik helped us reduce a potential outage from several hours to a mere 20 minutes.

We anticipated the benefits of Auvik upon deployment, and these expectations were confirmed two weeks later when we encountered an incident that was swiftly addressed.

Auvik has helped reduce our mean time to resolution from a few hours to a few minutes.

Auvik streamlines our network management by automating tasks like agent deployment and configuration. With SNMP enabled on new servers, Auvik automatically discovers them and adds them to the correct network map, saving us significant time compared to manual setup and troubleshooting.

The time savings are resulting in more time being dedicated to other tasks.

The way Auvik allows us to manage our infrastructure provides a top-level view of everything, solving several past issues. This includes streamlining on-call duties and maintaining an accurate asset inventory. Our deployment consists of one main site with 46 smaller sites, each running various cloud and production services. These can be managed individually, or we can leverage the top-level view for overall control, saving us time and money in the long run using Auvik.

While Auvik excels at out-of-the-box SNMP monitoring, a major selling point, maintaining services over time often requires custom development to ensure they function and transmit data properly. Ideally, Auvik could integrate the results from these custom applications and scripts directly, streamlining the monitoring process.

Auvik delivers on its core functionalities as advertised, with a smooth deployment and execution process. While the asset management features are helpful for basic network inventory, increased customization for data presentation would be beneficial. This could include integrating custom application results or incorporating data from our own monitoring scripts. It's important to remember that asset management isn't a core function of Auvik, but rather a bonus feature. While additional customization would be a welcome improvement, it's not a core expectation of the software.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for two months.

Auvik Network Management has been stable with no hiccups.

Auvik is handling our network workload well and shows no signs of scalability issues. Of course, we'll need to monitor performance as we grow and add more hardware, but for now, things are running smoothly.

My experience with their customer success team has been fantastic. They've even included technical support for review purposes during our calls.

Positive

We previously relied on a number of custom monitoring tools, including Nagios for system uptime and network capacity, and MRTG for generating graphs. These have all been replaced by Auvik, which provides these functionalities out of the box. We've also done away with internal alert triggers and manual asset lists, and now rely solely on Auvik in conjunction with PagerDuty for notifications and asset management, respectively. This has eliminated the need for maintaining separate spreadsheets and manual processes.

While Nagios is powerful, it demands significant effort and customization. In contrast, Auvik provides essential, out-of-the-box monitoring tools necessary to maintain network uptime. This ease of use allowed us to deploy it across 46 sites in under two hours.

The Auvik deployment started during the trial phase with a collector installed on a few test networks. After successful evaluation, transitioning to full production involved a simple firewall rule change and a one-page document outlining the rollout process, including a maintenance window and proper site naming. Since launch, the team has been fine-tuning the pre-configured alerts to minimize noise and ensure they only trigger when necessary.

One resource was required for the deployment.

Our team handled the deployment process ourselves, and Auvik's customer success team provided us with direct feedback throughout the process.

While traditional ROI might not apply since I don't resell Auvik, the return we're seeing is in engineer productivity. Auvik automates monitoring tasks, freeing them up for other projects. It's still early – only a month and a half – but so far it's been fantastic. We're tracking how much time is saved, and if this trend continues, Auvik will be a major success for our team.

Among the products considered, Auvik stood out for its competitive pricing. While Datadog was considerably more expensive, Auvik offered features and pricing similar to NetData. The Auvik team's customer success and account management teams impressed us with their ability to secure discounts and other incentives, making the deal even more attractive.

Our monitoring covers a large number of devices, well over 150 in total. While our billing reflects around 40 devices, most of these are Linux servers which are included in our monitoring package. This includes virtual machines where the servers reside, and we receive alerts for any issues like disk space, CPU usage, memory problems, or backup failures.

In our evaluation of several monitoring options, we considered Datadog for application monitoring, the new version of Nagios, and NetData for network monitoring. We also explored a few other possibilities. Ultimately, Datadog, Auvik, and NetData emerged as the frontrunners, undergoing extensive testing and trials to determine if they met our requirements.

While ease of deployment was a key factor in choosing Auvik, it wasn't the only one. As a Canadian company, Auvik did hold a certain patriotic appeal, but ultimately, it came down to features and price. Datadog and NetData were significantly more expensive for a production environment. We ruled out Nagios because migrating our existing setup wasn't feasible, meaning a complete rebuild. Thankfully, Auvik's deployment took less than two hours.

I would rate Auvik Network Management ten out of ten.

Auvik has been a key tool for simplifying our platform monitoring. Its intuitive user interface allows for easy navigation between instances, minimizing training time for junior staff. We've reduced onboarding sessions from multiple sessions to just a half hour, making it significantly easier for our new technicians to get up to speed.

One of the key reasons we chose Auvik was because of its minimal maintenance requirements, which is perfect for our small team. Since it's cloud-hosted, the collectors automatically upgrade themselves, so we don't need to worry about keeping up with updates or ensuring we're on the latest version – that's all handled by Auvik.

In my experience, Auvik stands out for its ease of use, especially during the trial period. Setting up trials in custom environments can be difficult, but Auvik's worked flawlessly. Their support was readily available, and their pricing was competitive with good value. Overall, it's a top choice for managing IT infrastructure.