Top 10 Barracuda Web Security and Filtering Alternatives

3.8 out of 5

11 reviews
90% willing to recommend

277 followers

Top Barracuda Web Security and Filtering Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Barracuda Web Security and Filtering based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cisco Umbrella, Zscaler Internet Access, and Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Barracuda Web Security and Filtering surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive threat protection, advanced content filtering, and seamless cloud integration, ensuring optimal performance and security for businesses while providing user-friendly management and real-time traffic monitoring features.

Barracuda Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Barracuda Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Barracuda Web Security and Filtering appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its cost-effective pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella offers advanced security features and comprehensive threat prevention, justifying its higher price, appealing to those prioritizing long-term security investments.

Download Barracuda Web Security and Filtering vs. Cisco Umbrella Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Security and Filtering involves a lower setup cost, while Cisco Umbrella may require a higher initial investment. The difference in setup costs reflects their implementation strategies and budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Zscaler Internet Access

4.1 out of 5

Zscaler Internet Access

4.1 out of 5

Barracuda Web Security and Filtering offers ease of integration and competitive pricing, ideal for smaller budgets. In comparison, Zscaler Internet Access provides a cloud-centric model and advanced features, delivering long-term ROI and scalability. Each appeals to different organizational needs based on integration and feature depth.

Download Barracuda Web Security and Filtering vs. Zscaler Internet Access Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Security and Filtering has a straightforward setup cost, while Zscaler Internet Access involves a more complex pricing structure. The notable difference lies in the setup cost simplicity of Barracuda compared to Zscaler's more intricate cost considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway

3.9 out of 5

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway

3.9 out of 5

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway provides robust threat protection and data loss prevention tools with streamlined deployment. In comparison, Barracuda Web Security and Filtering offers versatile access controls and advanced filtering options, appealing to those needing comprehensive security and fine-tuned policy management despite a higher upfront cost.

Download Barracuda Web Security and Filtering vs. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Report

Pricing

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway offers a more complex setup cost, while Barracuda Web Security and Filtering presents a simpler and potentially less expensive implementation, highlighting a clear difference in initial deployment requirements between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

TitanHQ WebTitan

4.6 out of 5

TitanHQ WebTitan

4.6 out of 5

Barracuda offers effective web filtering with strong pricing and malware protection. In comparison, TitanHQ WebTitan excels in security features with advanced threat analysis, making it ideal for high-security priorities. Barracuda's competitive pricing contrasts with WebTitan's comprehensive features, offering distinct value to tech buyers.

Download Barracuda Web Security and Filtering vs. TitanHQ WebTitan Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Security and Filtering has a higher setup cost compared to TitanHQ WebTitan's more affordable setup fees, offering a clear financial distinction between the two web security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Barracuda Web Security and Filtering has a higher setup cost compared to TitanHQ WebTitan's more affordable setup fees, offering a clear financial distinction between the two web security solutions.

Check Point Web Gateway

4.1 out of 5

Check Point Web Gateway

4.1 out of 5

Barracuda Web Security and Filtering offers competitive pricing and support with straightforward deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Check Point Web Gateway provides advanced security features and long-term ROI, ideal for organizations prioritizing high-level security despite a higher cost.

Download Barracuda Web Security and Filtering vs. Check Point Web Gateway Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Security and Filtering incurs a lower setup cost while Check Point Web Gateway involves higher initial expenses, reflecting notable differences in budget considerations for potential users.

View comparison

Pricing

Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG)

4.3 out of 5

Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG)

4.3 out of 5

Barracuda Web Security attracts tech buyers with its cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Sangfor IAG offers extensive control and robust management features, appealing to those seeking comprehensive Internet access solutions despite its higher initial investment and more complex installation process.

Download Barracuda Web Security and Filtering vs. Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Security and Filtering requires a higher setup cost compared to Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG), making Sangfor the more cost-effective option for initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Barracuda Web Security and Filtering requires a higher setup cost compared to Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG), making Sangfor the more cost-effective option for initial deployment.

Related categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Web Content Filtering

Internet Security