Acronis Cyber Protect vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] comparison

Acronis Cyber Protect and Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup are solutions operating in the backup and data protection category. Acronis generally gains the upper hand due to its feature set, extensive platform support, and affordability for SMBs.

Features: Acronis Cyber Protect is favored for its comprehensive backup features including incremental, full, and differential backups. It supports multiple platforms and has a robust suite for file management through disk imaging capabilities. Nutanix Mine, by contrast, lacks some of the advanced backup and sync features found in Acronis, although it effectively supports on-premises environments.

Room for Improvement: Acronis Cyber Protect's installation is resource-intensive, with notable disk space demands that could slow systems during backups. Its user experience and compatibility could benefit from streamlining. Nutanix Mine needs better integration with virtualization platforms and improved scalability, along with a more economical cost structure particularly attractive to smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acronis Cyber Protect can be deployed across hybrid, public, and private clouds efficiently. While users appreciate its remote support, there are reports of delays in technical assistance. Conversely, Nutanix Mine is noted for on-premises deployment but lacks the flexibility of Acronis. Users mention effective customer service but face similar technical support challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Acronis Cyber Protect's flexible and cost-effective licensing is suited for SMBs, despite some price hikes. Users value its affordability in relation to its rich features. Nutanix Mine is generally more expensive, favored by larger enterprises, and its value perception varies due to its higher cost.