


ActiveBatch by Redwood and AppWorx Workload Automation are competitors in the workload automation category, each offering unique strengths. ActiveBatch appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive integration options and flexible deployment capabilities.
Features: ActiveBatch boasts robust integration frameworks and extensive automation features, with strengths in job scheduling, conditional logic, and event-based scheduling. It offers customizable job steps and focuses on visibility and flexibility. AppWorx Workload Automation is praised for its simplicity and reliability, offering SOAP agents for AI-driven automation and a master engine setup that is easy to handle. It supports multi-environment compatibility, making it versatile for different setups.
Room for Improvement: ActiveBatch users suggest improvements in the user interface, dashboard features, cloud integration, and documentation. The software's complexity and steep learning curve are noted as challenges. AppWorx could enhance support for mainframe environments, adjust pricing models, and modernize its UI. Users also mention licensing and support challenges as areas for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer on-premises and cloud deployment options, with ActiveBatch providing a slightly broader range of environment support. ActiveBatch receives positive feedback on vendor support, though users seek better support documentation and training. AppWorx's support, managed by a third party, has impacted user satisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: ActiveBatch is known for reasonable pricing and a flexible licensing model, transitioning to a subscription model that could influence cost perceptions. It offers significant ROI by enhancing automation efficiencies. AppWorx has a historically cost-efficient pricing model, but recent licensing cost increases due to an execution-based model have affected user satisfaction. Both products deliver solid ROI via time savings and operational efficiencies.
The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.
We require fewer team members to handle operations due to its robust automation.
The product manages workloads efficiently, allowing our operators to learn and operate it quickly, which underscores its value to our business.
It has significantly reduced the time required for tasks that were previously manual, such as running batch and online jobs and report submissions.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
We often need to escalate issues to level two or three for solutions related to long-standing problems.
Their current support level is really good.
Technical support is managed by third parties now, which complicates direct customer assistance from Broadcom.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
ActiveBatch by Redwood's scalability is excellent; it experiences minimal failures and outages.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
We have not faced any real issues, and it’s the main reason why we haven't enabled a lot of the redundancy features.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
On the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs.
I believe ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved because the UI could be modernized.
AppWorx Workload Automation does not support mainframe environments.
Licensing fees have increased as they charge based on executions rather than user agents, causing higher costs.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ActiveBatch by Redwood has been great
Licensing now depends on execution counts as opposed to agent counts, leading to increased costs.
The licensing is fair and reasonable for what the product offers.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
The addition of AI has made troubleshooting and supporting users through ActiveBatch by Redwood quicker for me.
The best feature that ActiveBatch by Redwood offers is the user interface.
AppWorx Workload Automation's simplicity and powerful functionality are its most valuable features for us.
Atomic Applications Manager is user-friendly and accommodates around 100 users who can monitor and run their jobs effectively.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| JAMS | 2.6% |
| AppWorx Workload Automation | 1.8% |
| ActiveBatch by Redwood | 2.9% |
| Other | 92.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.
Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.
What are JAMS's key features?In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.
ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.
ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.
What important features does ActiveBatch offer?In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.
AppWorx Workload Automation automates your Ellucian’s Banner or Fiserv DNA processing. This innovative, best-in-class task scheduling solution accelerates your processing, provides visibility and control over business processes, and mitigates risk in both environments.
AppWorx Workload Automation Can:
Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Ellucian’s Banner
Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Fiserv DNA Processing
Reviews from Real Users
“The most valuable feature for me is the scheduling,” says an enterprise application architect at a retailer who has been using the solution for close to 10 years.
A manager at a tech services company adds that “The interface is good. The compliance-related features are very good.”
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.