ActiveBatch by Redwood vs JSCAPE by Redwood comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Redwood Software are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.5, while Redwood Software is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.3. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 1.8% mindshare in MFT, compared to Redwood Software’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Redwood Software users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

JSCAPE by Redwood and ActiveBatch by Redwood compete in the file transfer and automation software category. JSCAPE appears to have the upper hand in handling complex workflows and high security, whereas ActiveBatch stands out for its extensive pre-built automation features and flexible scheduling.

Features: JSCAPE offers high scalability, strong encryption for data security, and audit trails that enhance its compliance capabilities. Users appreciate its ability to handle complex workflows and automate processes using triggers. It also centralizes file transfers into a single interface. ActiveBatch provides extensive pre-built automation capabilities, making it easy to manage various systems and applications. It facilitates flexible job scheduling, supports complex workflows, and integrates seamlessly with other platforms providing end-to-end visibility.

Room for Improvement: JSCAPE could improve by offering more customization options and intuitive interfaces. Its documentation for new features could be clearer, and support for complex workflows could be enhanced. ActiveBatch might benefit from a more user-friendly interface and better accessibility for new users. Improved documentation and more cloud-based integrations would enhance the user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JSCAPE supports deployment in hybrid and on-premises environments and offers 24/7 customer service, though users have suggested the addition of on-call or chat support. ActiveBatch is primarily on-premises but also supports hybrid and public cloud settings. It is known for responsive customer support, though improvements in communication and support access could enhance user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: JSCAPE is praised for affordable licensing options, contributing to time and cost savings in file management, although some find its pricing relatively high. ActiveBatch is generally viewed as reasonably priced for the features offered, with subscription benefits available, although recent pricing changes have raised concerns. Both solutions deliver a notable ROI by enhancing operational efficiency and providing robust support, despite differing opinions on cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Aspera Managed File Transfer

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Aspera Managed File Transfer is 3.5%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 1.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JSCAPE by Redwood is 2.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Beneficial quick protocol, powerful, but limited use cases

Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand. The best way to propose a suite is to have an integrated suite where the customer could choose to license part of it. This solution could be one solution not two choices between 10 or 12 different solutions. The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is the communication protocol, which is fast. There are a lot of different clients that are offering features related to these fast protocols. It's possible to create one unique suite that can handle this base protocol. It will be quite easy to propose to the customers.

Read full review

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Abhishek Acharya

Senior Software Analyst at Capgemini

Extremely extendable, fault-tolerant, and capable of handling huge file transfers

We need additional customization options in JSCAPE so that users may adjust the program to their individual needs and requirements. More flexible configuration choices, extra scripting capability, and the ability to create custom plugins or modules might all be included. Support for more complicated workflows, such as conditional logic or branching, could be added to allow users to create more advanced automation processes. Additionally, more detailed reporting and analytics capabilities are provided to assist users in gaining insights into file transfer activity, performance, and trends.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is that it's an incredibly fast protocol, you can use all the bandwidth available. If I need to send large amounts of data this is the fastest protocol on the market. I have been using it for some minor projects and it is very powerful."

"Good user interface and ability to set up multiple file transfer jobs."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time."

"What ActiveBatch allows you to do is develop a more efficient process. It gave me visibility into all my jobs so I could choose which jobs to run in parallel. This is much easier than when I have to try to do it through cron for Windows XP, where you really can't do things in parallel and know what is going on."

"ActiveBatch provides summary reports and logs for further analysis and improvements in monitoring servers, which is very handy."

"The product offers a centralized platform for managing activities across many environments, applications, etc."

"One of the most valuable features is the job templates. If we need to create an FTP job, we just drag over the FTP template and fill out the requirements using the variables that ActiveBatch uses. And that makes it reusable. We can create a job once but use it for many different clients."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to trigger workflows, one after another, based on success, without having to worry about overlapping workflows. The ability to integrate our BI, analytics, and our data quality jobs is also valuable"

"The Jobs Library has been a tremendous asset. For the most, that's what we use. There are some outliers, but we pretty much integrate those Jobs Library steps throughout the process, whether it's REST calls, FTP processes, or file copies and moves... That has helped us to build end-to-end workflows."

"It is very useful in sending confidential files through FPP servers."

"Since I started using this product, I have been able to easily track everything as it mainly monitors, alerts, and looks after all the services - even across platform scheduling - which has helped me immensely."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"JSCAPE's automation can obliterate manual file transfer processes, salvaging precious time and vanquishing the chances of errors."

"It helped in confidentially transferring files with a vast number of servers available with no external applications required."

"One of the standout features of this particular tool is its automation capabilities."

"The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering."

"We can send the data quickly and securely."

"It is easy to transfer large sets of files."

"It offers audit trails and reporting tools, allowing users to track file transfers, monitor user activities, and produce regulatory compliance reports."

"Triggers are also something that is useful as they automate the use of boilerplate code."

More JSCAPE by Redwood pros

Cons

"Deployment is complex and it was difficult to get support."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand."

"The solution's pricing is high and should be reduced."

"Providing some detailed training materials could be very helpful for new users who have very limited technical information about the tool."

"The product should be improved by providing a customization option."

"They could provide an easier installation guide or technical support to the organizations during the installation process."

"A nice thing to have would be the ability to comfortably pass variables from one job to another. That was one of the things that I found difficult."

"Except for the GUI, everything looks good."

"The thing I've noticed the most is the Help function. It's very difficult, at times, to find examples of how to do something. The Help function will explain what the tool does, but we're not a Windows shop at the data warehouse. Our data warehouse jobs actually run on Linux servers. Finding things for Linux-based solutions is not as easy as it is for Windows-based solutions. I would like to see more examples, and more non-Windows examples as well, in the Help."

"Setting up the software was hard."

"There are some issues with this version and finding the jobs that it ran. If you're looking at 1,000 different jobs, it shows based on the execution time, not necessarily the run time. So, if there was a constraint waiting, you may be looking for it in the wrong time frame. Plus, with thousands of jobs showing up and the way it pages output jobs, sometimes you end up with multiple pages on the screen, then you have to go through to find the specific job you're looking for. On the opposite side, you can limit the daily activity screen to show only jobs that failed or jobs currently running, which will shrink that back down. However, we have operators who are looking at the whole nightly cycle to make sure everything is there and make sure nothing got blocked or was waiting. Sometimes, they have a hard time finding every item within the list."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"The cost of the tool is relatively high and can pose a problem to medium and small-scale companies who are trying to overcome their on-premise server limitations."

"With constant software releases and updates, detailed notifications and documentation on the improvements along with the comparison of the past and present features would be helpful to understand and use it better."

"The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial."

"The documentation part can be improved to be more precise for beginners to understand the advanced features of the tool."

"The GUI has to be enhanced."

"Iteratively enhancing the user interface could help with streamlining workflows to make them more intuitive and user-friendly."

"The JSCAPE team could create detailed documents or blogs on how to troubleshoot certain errors that come over in integration with existing environment tools."

"Improving the error handling feature can help users to identify and resolve issues more quickly and efficiently."

More JSCAPE by Redwood cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is not an inexpensive solution. I am not aware of many competitors to determine how affordable the price is overall."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"The software is expensive compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aspera Managed File Transfer?

Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites wi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aspera Managed File Transfer?

The solution's pricing calculation needs revision to be more competitive

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Aspera Managed File Transfer?

Aspera Managed File Transfer has superior technology. Overall, I rate Aspera Managed File Transfer a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New u...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the...

See all answers

What do you like most about JSCAPE?

The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JSCAPE?

I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JSCAPE?

JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamp...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 77% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 15% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 9% of the time

More Aspera Managed File Transfer Competitors

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 29% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 24% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 11% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 7% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 43% of the time

MOVEit vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 36% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 20% of the time

More JSCAPE by Redwood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

November 2024

Download Aspera Managed File Transfer product report

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

December 2024

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood

December 2024

Download JSCAPE by Redwood product report

Also Known As

No data available

ActiveBatch

No data available

Learn More

IBM

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Video not available

Redwood Software

Overview

IBM Aspera takes a different approach to tackling the challenges of big data movement over global WANs. Rather than optimize or accelerate data transfer, Aspera eliminates underlying bottlenecks by using its proprietary fasp technology that fully utilizes available network bandwidth to maximize speed and quickly scale up with no theoretical limit. Using fasp, transfers are secure end-to-end and are largely unaffected by file size, transfer distance, or network conditions, making transfer times up to 100Xs faster than TCP-based protocols.

IBM Aspera offers SaaS, on-prem, and hybrid solutions to meet the needs of modernizing infrastructures. All solutions offer robust security and compliance, intuitive file sharing, workflow automation, central administration, and real-time visibility. Quickly and easily initiate transfers across hybrid infrastructures, including support for cloud-to-cloud transfers. IBM Aspera offers unmatched transfer speeds, end-to-end security, reliability, and exceptional bandwidth control.

ActiveBatch by Redwood automates and manages batch processes, data integration tasks, and workflow scheduling. It's used for file transfers, data processing, server monitoring, and report generation, supporting both on-prem and cloud environments.

Organizations implement ActiveBatch by Redwood to automate complex job scheduling and data workflows, integrating seamlessly with FTP, SQL, PowerShell, and other systems. With features like real-time monitoring, error handling, and centralized management, users can significantly boost productivity while minimizing manual intervention. Its flexibility in supporting on-premises and cloud environments makes it adaptable for diverse IT landscapes. The tool simplifies workflow orchestration with an extensive library of pre-built steps and robust API integrations, ensuring efficiency in handling various workloads.

What are ActiveBatch by Redwood's key features?

Job automation: Automates routine and complex jobs.
Real-time monitoring: Offers instant insights into job performance.
Customizable workflows: Tailors workflows to specific business needs.
PowerShell integration: Supports advanced script execution.
Job triggering: Initiates tasks based on specific conditions.
File handling: Manages file transfers and processing efficiently.
Server management: Monitors and handles server tasks consistently.
API integration: Connects with various applications for streamlined operations.
Alerting: Provides notifications for critical job events.
Flexible scheduling: Enables detailed and adaptable job scheduling.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Centralized management: Simplifies oversight of all processes.
Productivity boost: Reduces manual effort and errors.
Time savings: Accelerates task completion and workflow execution.
Comprehensive visibility: Enhances monitoring of all job activities.
Reliable performance: Ensures consistent task execution.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business and IT needs.

In various industries, ActiveBatch by Redwood is used to streamline operations, whether in finance handling large-scale data processing, healthcare managing patient records, or retail optimizing supply chains. It addresses specific needs by offering robust automation, efficient job scheduling, and seamless integration with existing systems, driving operational excellence and efficiency.

JSCAPE platform offers independent managed file transfer (MFT) software that allows users to secure and automate data exchange with trading partners, clients and internal transfers. Built-in security features and audit functions support PCI DSS, HIPAA, GLBA and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SaaS (MFTaaS) offering available.

Sample Customers

Gwinnett County Public Schools, Evonik, Voith, BITMARCK, Oracle

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

December 2024

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.