Acunetix vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,518 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Acunetix and GitHub compete in the application and code security arena, each excelling in different aspects. Acunetix has an edge with its advanced IAST module for detailed vulnerability detection, while GitHub is strong in source code management and collaboration.

Features: Acunetix includes IAST for in-depth analysis, scheduling scans, high-speed scanning, and detailed vulnerability reporting. It also offers low false positive rates and adaptability across different platforms. GitHub provides tools for branches, merges, GitHub Actions for CI/CD, code security, and social coding.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix needs enhancements in its IAST tool, false positive accuracy, and licensing model, as well as better integration with mobile environments and configuration edits. GitHub could improve its project management integration, conflict resolution, and support for large file uploads, alongside enhancing security and repository navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options, while GitHub is mainly cloud-based, allowing both public and hybrid cloud flexibility. Acunetix has generally responsive technical support but with room for faster response times. GitHub's support comes from its robust community and extensive online resources, lacking direct support.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix's increased pricing has lessened its initial competitiveness, though its ROI is evident through enhanced security features. GitHub provides better cost efficiency with its open-source model and low-cost enterprise solutions, making it suitable for budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Acunetix vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 848,989 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (14th), Vulnerability Management (23rd), DevSecOps (6th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.7%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It generates automated reports."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

"Picks up weaknesses in our app setups."

"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that."

"The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great."

"The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code."

"The usability and overall scan results are good."

"The solution is highly stable."

More Acunetix pros

"GitHub is good for collaboration because everyone can access it or we can restrict access to a few users. If I upload a file and share the URL, it's not restricted to a set number of users. Everyone with the link can download the files."

"GitHub Actions, specifically in the DevOps field, have been extremely valuable."

"GitHub is pure or open-source; you can access it anywhere. You can have a lot of collateral information. You can make the changes and do the reviews from one place."

"GitHub is good for small companies and for personal use."

"The most valuable features are the speed, low latency, and the clear, concise set of commands."

"The most valuable features are GitHub Actions for triggering workflows, GitHub Secrets for saving credentials without needing a third-party service, and the UI for identifying errors in the code when we commit."

"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."

"GitHub has improved the productivity of my team by simplifying code merging and enabling effective branching strategies."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"The pricing is a bit on the higher side."

"Acunetix needs to be dynamic with JavaScript code, unlike Netsparker which can scan complex agents."

"There's a clear need for a reduction in pricing to make the service more accessible."

"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."

"The only problem that they have is the price. It is a bit expensive, and you cannot change the number of applications for the whole year."

More Acunetix cons

"Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab."

"The initial setup requires heavy documentation which can be challenging for new developers."

"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

"If it had all of the end-to-end integration, then we probably wouldn't have any doubts about what we have installed. However, at this point, we're still trying to figure out how to use it end-to-end."

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"I would like to see integration with Slack such that all of the changes made in GitHub are reflected there."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"The solution is expensive."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I typically use Acunetix ( /products/acunetix-reviews ) to identify vulnerabilities for clients.

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I would recommend Acunetix to others. Overall, I rate this solution seven out of ten.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

Compared 12% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Acunetix

Download Acunetix product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Acunetix vs. GitHub