No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Agile Manager [EOL] vs Rally Software comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Agile Manager [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rally Software
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
121
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (7th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user739560 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior manager IT at a transportation company
Handles user stories well but the lack of a testing module is a problem
Right now I can't say because other stuff is being migrated to Octane. But basically, the testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all. If they would have added that into it then they wouldn't even need to build Octane. We did have a list of items we wanted to see added but now they are moving all those things to Octane, and we are also interested in Octane now, so we are not looking to request any more changes to AGM, understanding that this is the go-to tool.
Amit Anand - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Technical Architect at HCLSoftware
Drilling into change lifecycles has given me clear end to end traceability for every item
Reporting is my main area of concern. Additionally, the migration activity and portability are important areas for improvement. If I needed to move from Jira to Rally Software, having built-in portability or migration utilities would be beneficial. At the time of my use, there was not an inbuilt capability to migrate applications from other third-party solutions to Rally Software. Currently, I am not using Rally Software.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It really doesn't need to be as flexible as some other solutions because it's right out of the box, it's relatively easy to use."
"To me, the difference between what they're using now, the Atlassian product, and Agile Manager is that Agile Manager is much more scalable."
"Dashboard with release level graphs; it is so easy to gather the progress made at the release with these graphs rather going through each team’s backlogs."
"Burn-up charts for visibility on progress and workload."
"You can pretty much tie in from your requirements all the way through your entire application lifecycle management, and we are able to achieve that using this solution."
"We use the hierarchy Theme/Feature/Stories for a top-down approach, and the widgets/dashboards are essential to easily setup the reporting and by putting an image on the data, it helps people to understand the issues or to see the potential impacts of their actions."
"The product is really easy to use and manage single discrete projects with dedicated teams."
"How you write your user stories, and the requirements gathering, in Agile Manager is pretty good."
"My teams uses it for their daily agile management. They describe their user stories and track the progress of their projects."
"By having all our teams use the same tool, we have better communication and coordination."
"I would recommend it; it is a very good product, very helpful in managing, and pretty good at checking things."
"It allows us to work in a more dynamic fashion and track more of the development lifecycle."
"Visibility of the data, if teams are tracking correctly and entering their information correctly, makes it really easy to see where you're at within your release and whether you're on track or not, and while we can't get everything out of the box because we're a unique business, we know how to massage the reports to get what we need out of it, and so far it's done the best job for us."
"If you compare Quality Center vs Agile Central, the latter is much better."
"It has helped a great deal in the fact that we are able to take small chunks of data and get them actually moved forward end to end."
"It really helps us scale in terms of our organizations, and be more predictable."
 

Cons

"In the world of Java, it currently supports Eclipse but not NetBeans."
"We've not used it yet, and we're just kind of muddling through."
"The major drawbacks were in defect management and session sheet creation."
"Customer Service: Commercially speaking, the customer service was a total nightmare at the very beginning."
"It requires a lot of post-process testing of our products. It would be an improvement if those tests weren't necessary."
"The user interface could be modernized to be more intuitive and to support more drag/drop functionality."
"There is definitely a maturity curve that Agile Manager needs to go through with. It's still not there, and it definitely needs to grow."
"Resource allocation and management across multiple products. We have the same resources working on multiple products each with their own releases, and Agile Manager does not handle this well, so the overloading or underloading of resources is difficult to monitor."
"There are times when we struggle with stuff but we haven't really called customer support yet."
"I think one of the things that we stumble upon is how to organize the teams."
"We would probably like to see a more robust dependency management system."
"I understand it's a little more expensive. That is why many people prefer Jira."
"The portfolio side of it needs improving, especially integration into CA PPM."
"Currently, I would prefer to use QAComplete by SmartBear to track test cases, since CA Agile Central doesn’t work well with reporting on that level or for that matter on any level."
"What I don't like about it is that it is really hard to find old work to reference information and use the reporting section of the application in terms of trying to analyze trends."
"Sometimes it takes a few seconds to scale, such as when changing the size of Windows."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there."
"It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company."
"Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting."
"Rally Software costs $50 a month, and for a base account, that price is acceptable."
"We are always looking for a discount, if the solution was less expensive it would be a benefit."
"I understand it's a little more expensive. That is why many people prefer Jira."
"From a price point, it's a cost effective solution for our needs."
"I don't know the exact pricing, but I think the tool is priced high. They provide quality workmanship, good software, regular upgrades, and they're always attentive and listen to users. Everything comes with a price. I think it's an expensive solution compared to Jira or other competitors, but it's a complete package."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
911,549 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
14%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise113
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Rally Software?
Rally offers many features that help the management of activities, coordination, alignment and reports, which applies agility across the organization. If I were to highlight a particular feature, i...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rally Software?
The setup cost is expensive. I was not responsible for the license part, but it was on a yearly basis.
What needs improvement with Rally Software?
Reporting is my main area of concern. Additionally, the migration activity and portability are important areas for improvement. If I needed to move from Jira to Rally Software, having built-in port...
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Agile Manager, HPE Agile Manager
CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Trizetto, Discount Tire and Siemens
Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: August 2026.
911,549 professionals have used our research since 2012.