Agile Manager [EOL] vs Rally Software comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Additionally, 86% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Agile Manager [EOL]

Read 16 Agile Manager [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Rally Software

Read 121 Rally Software reviews

7,672 Views
6,521 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Agile Manager [EOL]

Rally Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Agile Manager [EOL] and Rally Software based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Agile Manager [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rally Software

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

121

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (7th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (4th)

Featured Reviews

it_user739560

Senior manager IT at a transportation company

Handles user stories well but the lack of a testing module is a problem

Right now I can't say because other stuff is being migrated to Octane. But basically, the testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all. If they would have added that into it then they wouldn't even need to build Octane. We did have a list of items we wanted to see added but now they are moving all those things to Octane, and we are also interested in Octane now, so we are not looking to request any more changes to AGM, understanding that this is the go-to tool.

Read full review

Amit Anand

Sr Technical Architect at HCLSoftware

Drilling into change lifecycles has given me clear end to end traceability for every item

Reporting is my main area of concern. Additionally, the migration activity and portability are important areas for improvement. If I needed to move from Jira to Rally Software, having built-in portability or migration utilities would be beneficial. At the time of my use, there was not an inbuilt capability to migrate applications from other third-party solutions to Rally Software. Currently, I am not using Rally Software.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"How you write your user stories, and the requirements gathering, in Agile Manager is pretty good."

"To me, the difference between what they're using now, the Atlassian product, and Agile Manager is that Agile Manager is much more scalable."

"We use the hierarchy Theme/Feature/Stories for a top-down approach, and the widgets/dashboards are essential to easily setup the reporting and by putting an image on the data, it helps people to understand the issues or to see the potential impacts of their actions."

"Integration with HPE ALM/QC, Jenkins and Subversion allows us to view the project’s health through one product."

"It has a good sprint task board with the ability to export tasks to Excel and filter by team member, and all the graphs, burndown charts and reporting are user friendly and quick."

"It really doesn't need to be as flexible as some other solutions because it's right out of the box, it's relatively easy to use."

"The transparency this product gives us has been very valuable."

"You can pretty much tie in from your requirements all the way through your entire application lifecycle management, and we are able to achieve that using this solution."

More Agile Manager [EOL] pros

"It is a very good tool, well suited for Agile methodology and user story management, and with the introduction of test case management and defect management, it has really boomed and is at par with some of the existing systems, apps, and test management tools such as HP ALM."

"The biggest benefit that we've found has to do with the ease of use, as we can get into the data and actually report out of it, and moving to a tool where you've got easy access to get to the data was a big win for us."

"Get the system customized because that's one of the strong aspects of CA Agile Central."

"The effect of these kind of tools drives the way you organize things. It helps you shape the way you flow."

"Technical support is excellent."

"This product had helped my organization so much because it helped us keep everything tracked."

"From a solution perspective, we use the Burndown to see whether the velocity for the entire sprint is okay or not, do I need to prioritize, how many impediments I have, what my backlog looks like, have I taken up enough in that given sprint, and will I be able to deliver all that, and it helps me track that down."

"What I like most about Rally Software, in terms of using it for the agile process, is that it's clear, useful, and user-friendly. I also like that it has every field you can use for the Scrum process."

More Rally Software pros

Cons

"This one kind of caught us by surprise, and all our evaluations from it doing demos to the team that was going to be using it."

"Understanding of story points and velocity, ease of using reporting/dashboard widgets, and templates for imports need improvement."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"Most of the enhancement requests we have are minor, but the biggest challenge we have is around integrations."

"Resource allocation and management across multiple products. We have the same resources working on multiple products each with their own releases, and Agile Manager does not handle this well, so the overloading or underloading of resources is difficult to monitor."

"There is definitely a maturity curve that Agile Manager needs to go through with. It's still not there, and it definitely needs to grow."

"Downtime was frequent initially, but now it is much better."

"We've not used it yet, and we're just kind of muddling through."

More Agile Manager [EOL] cons

"I'd like to be able to color code timeboxes, so I have an easy visual way to track the success of sprints."

"Basically, what I end up doing is just pulling those out, either copying, pasting or exporting them into a spreadsheet and then I'm back to managing them on a spreadsheet rather than in the tool and it's just time consuming."

"It's a bit cumbersome to manage the Project Picker. As we sunset teams or projects close out - but we still have test cases tied to those teams or projects that are being used in other spaces - we have this monstrous list in the Project Picker that becomes really difficult to manage and find, and we can't clean that up ourselves. It would be nice if it was easier to do that and not lose your history."

"I would like them to give me back the fields I used to have. We lost the release field because they mentored our scaled agile framework trainer to actually use the release field as what I would call a program increment."

"The stronger CA can get on dependency mapping the better. That's the biggest hiccup. As you're setting up your features, they should make it easier to flag the dependencies, either across features or across projects. Then you're more set up for success."

"We would probably like to see a more robust dependency management system."

"Defect and test case management Executive-level reporting capabilities Project management functionality (financials, EVM, resource planning, etc.) Lacks the ability for non-coders to create custom app/widget charts"

"The initial install was complex."

More Rally Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I don't know the exact pricing, but I think the tool is priced high. They provide quality workmanship, good software, regular upgrades, and they're always attentive and listen to users. Everything comes with a price. I think it's an expensive solution compared to Jira or other competitors, but it's a complete package."

"Rally Software costs $50 a month, and for a base account, that price is acceptable."

"Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting."

"I understand it's a little more expensive. That is why many people prefer Jira."

"The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there."

"We are always looking for a discount, if the solution was less expensive it would be a benefit."

"It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company."

"From a price point, it's a cost effective solution for our needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	113

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Rally Software?

Rally offers many features that help the management of activities, coordination, alignment and reports, which applies agility across the organization. If I were to highlight a particular feature, i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rally Software?

The setup cost is expensive. I was not responsible for the license part, but it was on a yearly basis.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rally Software?

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Rally Software

Compared 17% of the time

Jira vs Rally Software

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Rally Software

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Rally Software

Compared 5% of the time

Jira Align vs Rally Software

Compared 5% of the time

More Rally Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Agile Manager [EOL]

August 2026

Download Agile Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Rally Software

July 2026

Download Rally Software product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Agile Manager, HPE Agile Manager

CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM

Overview

Agile project management solution to plan, execute and track Agile projects. Agile teams can improve Release Planning, Sprint Planning, Sprint Execution, and gain more Visibility and Insight into Agile projects using SaaS or on-premise deployment.

Key Features include: Release and User Story and Defect Management, Development Tools Integration, Team/Resource Management, Rest APIs, Micro Focus ALM/QC/PPM Synchronizer, Regular releases driven by user feedback, Modern, clean, intuitive UI and SAFe^TM Gold Certified.

OpenText

Rally Software is an agile project management platform designed to support development teams with portfolio management, resource scheduling, and user story tracking, providing robust integrations with other tools and supporting Agile frameworks like Scrum and Kanban.

Rally Software enhances agile project management by supporting development teams with features like sprint planning, backlog management, and tracking user stories. It effectively organizes tasks and manages portfolios while enabling integration with other tools. The platform supports Agile methodologies, offering real-time dashboards for stakeholders and advanced reporting capabilities while providing an intuitive UI for improved user experience. However, users have noted areas for improvement in customization, report generation, and performance speed. Expansion of features and enhanced mobile capabilities are also desired, along with better dependency management and security controls.

What are the key features of Rally Software?

Portfolio Management: Efficiently manage and prioritize projects across multiple teams.
Resource Scheduling: Allocate and schedule resources effectively to ensure project success.
Team Planning: Organize team efforts and synchronize project activities.
User Story Tracking: Monitor user stories and ensure alignment with goals.
Sprint Tracking: Track sprint progress and analyze outcomes comprehensively.
Backlog Organization: Streamline the backlog management process for optimal project flow.
Real-Time Dashboards: Provide stakeholders with up-to-date project insights.
Integration Support: Seamlessly integrate with other tools to enhance workflow.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Improved Collaboration: Enhances team communication and collaborative efforts.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines project management tasks for quicker completion.
Flexible Agile Support: Provides comprehensive support for Scrum and Kanban methodologies.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and insights for informed decision-making.
Customization Options: Allows adaptation of features to fit specific requirements.

Rally Software is commonly implemented in industries focusing on agile project management, enabling development teams to enhance project workflows and integration processes. This tool assists in managing portfolios and supporting Scrum and Kanban methodologies, especially during global communication in quarterly PI meetings.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Trizetto, Discount Tire and Siemens

Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.