Agile Manager [EOL] vs Rally Software comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Additionally, 86% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Agile Manager [EOL]

Read 16 Agile Manager [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Rally Software

Read 121 Rally Software reviews

6,695 Views
5,825 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Agile Manager [EOL]

Rally Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Agile Manager [EOL] and Rally Software based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,645 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Agile Manager [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rally Software

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

121

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (4th)

Featured Reviews

it_user739560

Senior manager IT at a transportation company

Handles user stories well but the lack of a testing module is a problem

Right now I can't say because other stuff is being migrated to Octane. But basically, the testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all. If they would have added that into it then they wouldn't even need to build Octane. We did have a list of items we wanted to see added but now they are moving all those things to Octane, and we are also interested in Octane now, so we are not looking to request any more changes to AGM, understanding that this is the go-to tool.

Read full review

Amit Anand

Sr Technical Architect at HCLSoftware

Drilling into change lifecycles has given me clear end to end traceability for every item

Reporting is my main area of concern. Additionally, the migration activity and portability are important areas for improvement. If I needed to move from Jira to Rally Software, having built-in portability or migration utilities would be beneficial. At the time of my use, there was not an inbuilt capability to migrate applications from other third-party solutions to Rally Software. Currently, I am not using Rally Software.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Burn-up charts for visibility on progress and workload."

"It really doesn't need to be as flexible as some other solutions because it's right out of the box, it's relatively easy to use."

"Now we can do shorter cycles and have better traceability, and we have this integration between AGM and ALM, as I said."

"To me, the difference between what they're using now, the Atlassian product, and Agile Manager is that Agile Manager is much more scalable."

"We use the hierarchy Theme/Feature/Stories for a top-down approach, and the widgets/dashboards are essential to easily setup the reporting and by putting an image on the data, it helps people to understand the issues or to see the potential impacts of their actions."

"Dashboard with release level graphs; it is so easy to gather the progress made at the release with these graphs rather going through each team’s backlogs."

"The tool gave great visibility on the project work with real-time analytics and dashboards."

"With all of the different features, it's really user-friendly and syncs with Quality Center ALM, which is our testing tool."

More Agile Manager [EOL] pros

"Right now, it is the idea of having everything in place for both information and my project in a single network."

"What I like most about Rally Software, in terms of using it for the agile process, is that it's clear, useful, and user-friendly. I also like that it has every field you can use for the Scrum process."

"The visibility it brings to the plan, the ability to capture tasks, and trace them all the way through the life cycle. Providing that visibility helps both me and the team, or teams, to be able to understand where we are in the development process."

"With the portfolio management feature we were able to understand our capacity for the first time and visually understand all the various initiatives in-flight."

"It documents stories in a way where we do not have to be heavy on front-end requirements, front-end documentation, and front-end workflows."

"I think it is an excellent tool for tracking agile scrum activities."

"Reporting is much easier and faster than Micro Focus ALM, with CA AC built on web services... Also, the data is more granular when it comes to tasks, iterations, sprints, and releases."

"Get the system customized because that's one of the strong aspects of CA Agile Central."

More Rally Software pros

Cons

"This one kind of caught us by surprise, and all our evaluations from it doing demos to the team that was going to be using it."

"This product does not fully cover the SDLC. The test team cannot track test cases or connect them with test cases."

"The user interface could be modernized to be more intuitive and to support more drag/drop functionality."

"Downtime was frequent initially, but now it is much better."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"There is definitely a maturity curve that Agile Manager needs to go through with. It's still not there, and it definitely needs to grow."

"In the world of Java, it currently supports Eclipse but not NetBeans."

"Resource allocation and management across multiple products. We have the same resources working on multiple products each with their own releases, and Agile Manager does not handle this well, so the overloading or underloading of resources is difficult to monitor."

More Agile Manager [EOL] cons

"It could do with a wider range of colours for cards and the Kanban features need some improvement (which I know is on the way this year)."

"The initial install was complex."

"Stability of the product is not good."

"I think the interface could be a little bit more visual and less wordy. Right now, it seems like it's just a lot of text on the page. In other ticketing systems where it's more visual, you can see more of a flow. But in this one it's more just a list of tasks. I would like to see that a little bit better, especially considering it has so many great organizational features, like child tasks, different artifacts. It would be great to see it presented more appropriately."

"Overall, standard/canned reporting options are probably the weakest part of the platform but exporting a data dump for reporting outside of the tool is very easy."

"I think there needs to be some simplification. The team-level side can be challenging and complicated."

"Customization features may not be exposed or unavailable, so people may be looking for them. So, customization is an area people have told me is more desirable."

"The problem before was that there were just a lot of little bugs where you create a project in one place and it would not continue to exist in another."

More Rally Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company."

"From a price point, it's a cost effective solution for our needs."

"I don't know the exact pricing, but I think the tool is priced high. They provide quality workmanship, good software, regular upgrades, and they're always attentive and listen to users. Everything comes with a price. I think it's an expensive solution compared to Jira or other competitors, but it's a complete package."

"Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting."

"The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there."

"I understand it's a little more expensive. That is why many people prefer Jira."

"Rally Software costs $50 a month, and for a base account, that price is acceptable."

"We are always looking for a discount, if the solution was less expensive it would be a benefit."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	113

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Rally Software?

Rally offers many features that help the management of activities, coordination, alignment and reports, which applies agility across the organization. If I were to highlight a particular feature, i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rally Software?

The setup cost is expensive. I was not responsible for the license part, but it was on a yearly basis.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rally Software?

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Rally Software

Compared 19% of the time

Jira vs Rally Software

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Rally Software

Compared 7% of the time

Jira Align vs Rally Software

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Rally Software

Compared 6% of the time

More Rally Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Agile Manager [EOL]

June 2026

Download Agile Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Rally Software

May 2026

Download Rally Software product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Agile Manager, HPE Agile Manager

CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM

Overview

Agile project management solution to plan, execute and track Agile projects. Agile teams can improve Release Planning, Sprint Planning, Sprint Execution, and gain more Visibility and Insight into Agile projects using SaaS or on-premise deployment.

Key Features include: Release and User Story and Defect Management, Development Tools Integration, Team/Resource Management, Rest APIs, Micro Focus ALM/QC/PPM Synchronizer, Regular releases driven by user feedback, Modern, clean, intuitive UI and SAFe^TM Gold Certified.

OpenText

Rally Software is an agile project management platform designed to support development teams with portfolio management, resource scheduling, and user story tracking, providing robust integrations with other tools and supporting Agile frameworks like Scrum and Kanban.

Rally Software enhances agile project management by supporting development teams with features like sprint planning, backlog management, and tracking user stories. It effectively organizes tasks and manages portfolios while enabling integration with other tools. The platform supports Agile methodologies, offering real-time dashboards for stakeholders and advanced reporting capabilities while providing an intuitive UI for improved user experience. However, users have noted areas for improvement in customization, report generation, and performance speed. Expansion of features and enhanced mobile capabilities are also desired, along with better dependency management and security controls.

What are the key features of Rally Software?

Portfolio Management: Efficiently manage and prioritize projects across multiple teams.
Resource Scheduling: Allocate and schedule resources effectively to ensure project success.
Team Planning: Organize team efforts and synchronize project activities.
User Story Tracking: Monitor user stories and ensure alignment with goals.
Sprint Tracking: Track sprint progress and analyze outcomes comprehensively.
Backlog Organization: Streamline the backlog management process for optimal project flow.
Real-Time Dashboards: Provide stakeholders with up-to-date project insights.
Integration Support: Seamlessly integrate with other tools to enhance workflow.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Improved Collaboration: Enhances team communication and collaborative efforts.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines project management tasks for quicker completion.
Flexible Agile Support: Provides comprehensive support for Scrum and Kanban methodologies.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and insights for informed decision-making.
Customization Options: Allows adaptation of features to fit specific requirements.

Rally Software is commonly implemented in industries focusing on agile project management, enabling development teams to enhance project workflows and integration processes. This tool assists in managing portfolios and supporting Scrum and Kanban methodologies, especially during global communication in quarterly PI meetings.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Trizetto, Discount Tire and Siemens

Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.