Agile Manager [EOL] vs Rally Software comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Additionally, 86% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Agile Manager [EOL]

Read 16 Agile Manager [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Rally Software

Read 121 Rally Software reviews

8,426 Views
7,078 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Agile Manager [EOL]

Rally Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Agile Manager [EOL] and Rally Software based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,394 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Agile Manager [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rally Software

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

121

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (7th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (3rd)

Featured Reviews

it_user739560

Senior manager IT at a transportation company

Handles user stories well but the lack of a testing module is a problem

Right now I can't say because other stuff is being migrated to Octane. But basically, the testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all. If they would have added that into it then they wouldn't even need to build Octane. We did have a list of items we wanted to see added but now they are moving all those things to Octane, and we are also interested in Octane now, so we are not looking to request any more changes to AGM, understanding that this is the go-to tool.

Read full review

Amit Anand

Sr Technical Architect at HCLSoftware

Drilling into change lifecycles has given me clear end to end traceability for every item

Reporting is my main area of concern. Additionally, the migration activity and portability are important areas for improvement. If I needed to move from Jira to Rally Software, having built-in portability or migration utilities would be beneficial. At the time of my use, there was not an inbuilt capability to migrate applications from other third-party solutions to Rally Software. Currently, I am not using Rally Software.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With all of the different features, it's really user-friendly and syncs with Quality Center ALM, which is our testing tool."

"The product is really easy to use and manage single discrete projects with dedicated teams."

"To me, the difference between what they're using now, the Atlassian product, and Agile Manager is that Agile Manager is much more scalable."

"Burn-up charts for visibility on progress and workload."

"Dashboard with release level graphs; it is so easy to gather the progress made at the release with these graphs rather going through each team’s backlogs."

"This solution gives us flexibility in product testing and allows us to get our products with very quick time-to-market."

"How you write your user stories, and the requirements gathering, in Agile Manager is pretty good."

"The tool gave great visibility on the project work with real-time analytics and dashboards."

More Agile Manager [EOL] pros

"It has made our company more organized and it is helping us be more true to the agile principle."

"It really helped to connect the dots between what the overall vision was down to T-Mobile, having that view into features and roadmap from product to delivery teams, and where they are going, then execute on, being able to have the information, helping to facilitate those conversations, and just overall delivery."

"When we reached out for technical support via the CA Agile Central team at our organization, when we had some particular requests, they were absolutely incredible."

"Tech support is very responsive, helpful, and available."

"I would tell colleagues looking for a similar solution that Agile Central is very easy to use, and it's easy to build dashboards."

"It is the only solution that we are using now for all of the project management activities in our organization."

"It scales very well. It improves in technology constantly and gets up to speed with the latest and greatest."

"The best feature for our company is that it's easy to use, and it integrates with our other solutions, such as the code warehouse, the test solution, and the deploy solution."

More Rally Software pros

Cons

"Customer Service: Commercially speaking, the customer service was a total nightmare at the very beginning."

"Most of the enhancement requests we have are minor, but the biggest challenge we have is around integrations."

"Understanding of story points and velocity, ease of using reporting/dashboard widgets, and templates for imports need improvement."

"Downtime was frequent initially, but now it is much better."

"The testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all."

"Resource allocation and management across multiple products. We have the same resources working on multiple products each with their own releases, and Agile Manager does not handle this well, so the overloading or underloading of resources is difficult to monitor."

"The tool is good enough to keep track of the information, but not mature enough to have a great Dashboard that tracks all levels of changes."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

More Agile Manager [EOL] cons

"I've seen how it can be mishandled and not implemented strongly to where it becomes more of a hindrance than a value."

"There are times when we struggle with stuff but we haven't really called customer support yet."

"I would say use cases is an area with room for improvement."

"It is hard to track the changes. For example, we're in sprint 25, and then we have 26, 27, 28, and 29. Throughout that whole time, we're developing pipelines in Azure, moving to GitHub, creating pipelines, and working with teams. But sometimes, we need to revisit specific decisions made in previous sprints, like pipeline details. Maybe it's in our Azure Wiki, GitHub, or Teams, but it's not always consistent. I wish I could search for all tasks or stories related to that particular effort without needing to know everyone's individual stories or features."

"Defect and test case management Executive-level reporting capabilities Project management functionality (financials, EVM, resource planning, etc.) Lacks the ability for non-coders to create custom app/widget charts"

"The portfolio side of it needs improving, especially integration into CA PPM."

"The weakest part of this solution is its primitive report generator."

"Integration with Git is not very good."

More Rally Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I understand it's a little more expensive. That is why many people prefer Jira."

"The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there."

"Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting."

"I don't know the exact pricing, but I think the tool is priced high. They provide quality workmanship, good software, regular upgrades, and they're always attentive and listen to users. Everything comes with a price. I think it's an expensive solution compared to Jira or other competitors, but it's a complete package."

"Rally Software costs $50 a month, and for a base account, that price is acceptable."

"From a price point, it's a cost effective solution for our needs."

"We are always looking for a discount, if the solution was less expensive it would be a benefit."

"It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Outsourcing Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	113

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Rally Software?

Rally offers many features that help the management of activities, coordination, alignment and reports, which applies agility across the organization. If I were to highlight a particular feature, i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rally Software?

The setup cost is expensive. I was not responsible for the license part, but it was on a yearly basis.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rally Software?

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Rally Software

Compared 15% of the time

Jira vs Rally Software

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Rally Software

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Rally Software

Compared 5% of the time

Jira Align vs Rally Software

Compared 5% of the time

More Rally Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Agile Manager [EOL]

September 2026

Download Agile Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Rally Software

September 2026

Download Rally Software product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Agile Manager, HPE Agile Manager

CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM

Overview

Agile project management solution to plan, execute and track Agile projects. Agile teams can improve Release Planning, Sprint Planning, Sprint Execution, and gain more Visibility and Insight into Agile projects using SaaS or on-premise deployment.

Key Features include: Release and User Story and Defect Management, Development Tools Integration, Team/Resource Management, Rest APIs, Micro Focus ALM/QC/PPM Synchronizer, Regular releases driven by user feedback, Modern, clean, intuitive UI and SAFe^TM Gold Certified.

OpenText

Rally Software is an agile project management platform designed to support development teams with portfolio management, resource scheduling, and user story tracking, providing robust integrations with other tools and supporting Agile frameworks like Scrum and Kanban.

Rally Software enhances agile project management by supporting development teams with features like sprint planning, backlog management, and tracking user stories. It effectively organizes tasks and manages portfolios while enabling integration with other tools. The platform supports Agile methodologies, offering real-time dashboards for stakeholders and advanced reporting capabilities while providing an intuitive UI for improved user experience. However, users have noted areas for improvement in customization, report generation, and performance speed. Expansion of features and enhanced mobile capabilities are also desired, along with better dependency management and security controls.

What are the key features of Rally Software?

Portfolio Management: Efficiently manage and prioritize projects across multiple teams.
Resource Scheduling: Allocate and schedule resources effectively to ensure project success.
Team Planning: Organize team efforts and synchronize project activities.
User Story Tracking: Monitor user stories and ensure alignment with goals.
Sprint Tracking: Track sprint progress and analyze outcomes comprehensively.
Backlog Organization: Streamline the backlog management process for optimal project flow.
Real-Time Dashboards: Provide stakeholders with up-to-date project insights.
Integration Support: Seamlessly integrate with other tools to enhance workflow.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Improved Collaboration: Enhances team communication and collaborative efforts.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines project management tasks for quicker completion.
Flexible Agile Support: Provides comprehensive support for Scrum and Kanban methodologies.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and insights for informed decision-making.
Customization Options: Allows adaptation of features to fit specific requirements.

Rally Software is commonly implemented in industries focusing on agile project management, enabling development teams to enhance project workflows and integration processes. This tool assists in managing portfolios and supporting Scrum and Kanban methodologies, especially during global communication in quarterly PI meetings.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Trizetto, Discount Tire and Siemens

Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.