Agile Manager [EOL] vs Rally Software comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Additionally, 86% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Agile Manager [EOL]

Read 16 Agile Manager [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Rally Software

Read 121 Rally Software reviews

9,647 Views
8,007 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Agile Manager [EOL]

Rally Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Agile Manager [EOL] and Rally Software based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Agile Manager [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rally Software

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

121

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (7th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (3rd)

Featured Reviews

it_user739560

Senior manager IT at a transportation company

Handles user stories well but the lack of a testing module is a problem

Right now I can't say because other stuff is being migrated to Octane. But basically, the testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all. If they would have added that into it then they wouldn't even need to build Octane. We did have a list of items we wanted to see added but now they are moving all those things to Octane, and we are also interested in Octane now, so we are not looking to request any more changes to AGM, understanding that this is the go-to tool.

Read full review

Amit Anand

Sr Technical Architect at HCLSoftware

Drilling into change lifecycles has given me clear end to end traceability for every item

Reporting is my main area of concern. Additionally, the migration activity and portability are important areas for improvement. If I needed to move from Jira to Rally Software, having built-in portability or migration utilities would be beneficial. At the time of my use, there was not an inbuilt capability to migrate applications from other third-party solutions to Rally Software. Currently, I am not using Rally Software.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It really doesn't need to be as flexible as some other solutions because it's right out of the box, it's relatively easy to use."

"You can pretty much tie in from your requirements all the way through your entire application lifecycle management, and we are able to achieve that using this solution."

"This solution gives us flexibility in product testing and allows us to get our products with very quick time-to-market."

"Dashboard with release level graphs; it is so easy to gather the progress made at the release with these graphs rather going through each team’s backlogs."

"Burn-up charts for visibility on progress and workload."

"Integration with HPE ALM/QC, Jenkins and Subversion allows us to view the project’s health through one product."

"The product is really easy to use and manage single discrete projects with dedicated teams."

"To me, the difference between what they're using now, the Atlassian product, and Agile Manager is that Agile Manager is much more scalable."

More Agile Manager [EOL] pros

"I like the Story Board since it helps me keep track of my stories and any tasks assigned."

"I get to see what we have, what test cases we need to deliver, per release, and it gives us the visibility into what we're doing and how we're doing on a day to day basis, to see if we need to refocus or to try to change things before it gets down into the negative."

"It's good only for documenting manual test cases."

"This solution saves us lots of time and it is central for everyone."

"The agile methodology has made it easy for all disciplines of software development such as the developer, QA, software architect (SA), and the product owner, and anybody can open up CA Agile Central and find out what they need, which has improved our productivity."

"The main value that we get out of Agile Central is the transparency it allows us to provide, both from the team level all the way through the executive level within the company and the work that we are doing."

"The metrics - collecting metrics. It's because we've used several other tools in the past, and they don't give you a full indication of how well your teams are performing, at a portfolio level, at a product level, and at the team level."

"The reporting, and being able to roll that up across the verticals, was an important selling point for us."

More Rally Software pros

Cons

"Customer Service: Commercially speaking, the customer service was a total nightmare at the very beginning."

"The user interface could be modernized to be more intuitive and to support more drag/drop functionality."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"We've not used it yet, and we're just kind of muddling through."

"In the world of Java, it currently supports Eclipse but not NetBeans."

"Most of the enhancement requests we have are minor, but the biggest challenge we have is around integrations."

"It requires a lot of post-process testing of our products. It would be an improvement if those tests weren't necessary."

"The testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all."

More Agile Manager [EOL] cons

"Also, the defect-management cycle needs work."

"I think one of the things that we stumble upon is how to organize the teams."

"There have been some downtimes with it, but they're fairly short."

"More importantly, we are seeing internal challenges from Atlassian because of their highly integrated suite that enables further automation and centralization of activities that are also highly necessary – messaging notifications cued off builds, collaboration on Solution Architecture Documentation, etc."

"It takes a very long time to load and, if you make some small changes, then the whole page has to reload."

"I think the only area that needs improvement will be the front end. It is very good as is but I think it could be better as the colors are a little faded."

"Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting."

"I would like them to give me back the fields I used to have. We lost the release field because they mentored our scaled agile framework trainer to actually use the release field as what I would call a program increment."

More Rally Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We are always looking for a discount, if the solution was less expensive it would be a benefit."

"It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company."

"I understand it's a little more expensive. That is why many people prefer Jira."

"I don't know the exact pricing, but I think the tool is priced high. They provide quality workmanship, good software, regular upgrades, and they're always attentive and listen to users. Everything comes with a price. I think it's an expensive solution compared to Jira or other competitors, but it's a complete package."

"Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting."

"The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there."

"Rally Software costs $50 a month, and for a base account, that price is acceptable."

"From a price point, it's a cost effective solution for our needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

21%

Healthcare Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Transportation Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	113

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Rally Software?

Rally offers many features that help the management of activities, coordination, alignment and reports, which applies agility across the organization. If I were to highlight a particular feature, i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rally Software?

The setup cost is expensive. I was not responsible for the license part, but it was on a yearly basis.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rally Software?

See all answers

Comparisons

Digital.ai TeamForge vs Agile Manager [EOL]

Compared 37% of the time

More Agile Manager [EOL] Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Rally Software

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs Rally Software

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Rally Software

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Rally Software

Compared 5% of the time

Nimble vs Rally Software

Compared 4% of the time

More Rally Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Agile Manager [EOL]

November 2026

Download Agile Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Rally Software

October 2026

Download Rally Software product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Agile Manager, HPE Agile Manager

CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM

Overview

Agile project management solution to plan, execute and track Agile projects. Agile teams can improve Release Planning, Sprint Planning, Sprint Execution, and gain more Visibility and Insight into Agile projects using SaaS or on-premise deployment.

Key Features include: Release and User Story and Defect Management, Development Tools Integration, Team/Resource Management, Rest APIs, Micro Focus ALM/QC/PPM Synchronizer, Regular releases driven by user feedback, Modern, clean, intuitive UI and SAFe^TM Gold Certified.

OpenText

Rally Software is an agile project management platform designed to support development teams with portfolio management, resource scheduling, and user story tracking, providing robust integrations with other tools and supporting Agile frameworks like Scrum and Kanban.

Rally Software enhances agile project management by supporting development teams with features like sprint planning, backlog management, and tracking user stories. It effectively organizes tasks and manages portfolios while enabling integration with other tools. The platform supports Agile methodologies, offering real-time dashboards for stakeholders and advanced reporting capabilities while providing an intuitive UI for improved user experience. However, users have noted areas for improvement in customization, report generation, and performance speed. Expansion of features and enhanced mobile capabilities are also desired, along with better dependency management and security controls.

What are the key features of Rally Software?

Portfolio Management: Efficiently manage and prioritize projects across multiple teams.
Resource Scheduling: Allocate and schedule resources effectively to ensure project success.
Team Planning: Organize team efforts and synchronize project activities.
User Story Tracking: Monitor user stories and ensure alignment with goals.
Sprint Tracking: Track sprint progress and analyze outcomes comprehensively.
Backlog Organization: Streamline the backlog management process for optimal project flow.
Real-Time Dashboards: Provide stakeholders with up-to-date project insights.
Integration Support: Seamlessly integrate with other tools to enhance workflow.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Improved Collaboration: Enhances team communication and collaborative efforts.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines project management tasks for quicker completion.
Flexible Agile Support: Provides comprehensive support for Scrum and Kanban methodologies.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and insights for informed decision-making.
Customization Options: Allows adaptation of features to fit specific requirements.

Rally Software is commonly implemented in industries focusing on agile project management, enabling development teams to enhance project workflows and integration processes. This tool assists in managing portfolios and supporting Scrum and Kanban methodologies, especially during global communication in quarterly PI meetings.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Trizetto, Discount Tire and Siemens

Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

November 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.