No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Agile Manager [EOL] vs Rally Software comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Agile Manager [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rally Software
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
121
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (8th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user739560 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior manager IT at a transportation company
Handles user stories well but the lack of a testing module is a problem
Right now I can't say because other stuff is being migrated to Octane. But basically, the testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all. If they would have added that into it then they wouldn't even need to build Octane. We did have a list of items we wanted to see added but now they are moving all those things to Octane, and we are also interested in Octane now, so we are not looking to request any more changes to AGM, understanding that this is the go-to tool.
Amit Anand - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Technical Architect at HCLSoftware
Drilling into change lifecycles has given me clear end to end traceability for every item
Reporting is my main area of concern. Additionally, the migration activity and portability are important areas for improvement. If I needed to move from Jira to Rally Software, having built-in portability or migration utilities would be beneficial. At the time of my use, there was not an inbuilt capability to migrate applications from other third-party solutions to Rally Software. Currently, I am not using Rally Software.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution gives us flexibility in product testing and allows us to get our products with very quick time-to-market."
"Integration with HPE ALM/QC, Jenkins and Subversion allows us to view the project’s health through one product."
"With all of the different features, it's really user-friendly and syncs with Quality Center ALM, which is our testing tool."
"To me, the difference between what they're using now, the Atlassian product, and Agile Manager is that Agile Manager is much more scalable."
"It has a good sprint task board with the ability to export tasks to Excel and filter by team member, and all the graphs, burndown charts and reporting are user friendly and quick."
"The tool gave great visibility on the project work with real-time analytics and dashboards."
"The transparency this product gives us has been very valuable."
"It really doesn't need to be as flexible as some other solutions because it's right out of the box, it's relatively easy to use."
"I liked the overall user interface of Agile Central; it is so much more user friendly, the Kanban view really helps daily tracking of user stories, and the reporting tools available are easy to configure and use."
"The program management is one of the most valuable features in the bank I work for, as I was able to create epics for our budgeting concerns and it helped me link everything together."
"The dashboard and planning board are the most valuable features, as they help me track the progress of my user stories."
"Its ability to scale."
"It helps me evaluate teams' historical performance using velocity charts."
"The reporting, and being able to roll that up across the verticals, was an important selling point for us."
"Of those three options, I would say that CA Agile Central is excellent."
"The end-to-end lifecycle traceability is good, I can drill down from a single window and move into another subcategory, which I find most valuable, and I can view configuration item details, such as what is being changed, and see any change requests attached to items or configuration items being moved to other locations, with clear traceability and end-to-end connectivity for any change item."
 

Cons

"It requires a lot of post-process testing of our products. It would be an improvement if those tests weren't necessary."
"Customer Service: Commercially speaking, the customer service was a total nightmare at the very beginning."
"The testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all."
"Most of the enhancement requests we have are minor, but the biggest challenge we have is around integrations."
"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."
"This one kind of caught us by surprise, and all our evaluations from it doing demos to the team that was going to be using it."
"This product does not fully cover the SDLC. The test team cannot track test cases or connect them with test cases."
"Downtime was frequent initially, but now it is much better."
"Being a Kanban team inside of SAFe, some of the fields that you have to fill out are a little awkward, because then you can't use the views the way you want to."
"I think the only area that needs improvement will be the front end. It is very good as is but I think it could be better as the colors are a little faded."
"Reporting I think is a big one too, especially at the bank. So if we're not able to get that real data in a very simple way and be able to slice and dice it, then we aren't as effective as we could be at making those decisions quickly."
"For the reporting side, it could have more options besides generating the chart."
"I would like for workspace admins to be able to hide projects in the Project Picker and not lose any historical data; make them invisible to certain users, visible to certain users, depending on permission sets. That would be lovely."
"Not as user friendly as VersionOne."
"More customization capabilities would be helpful. Providing a little bit more structure around how the system should be set up in terms of the hierarchy structure might be helpful as well."
"There should be different ways to decide on the requirements, not only by using a flow chart."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"From a price point, it's a cost effective solution for our needs."
"I understand it's a little more expensive. That is why many people prefer Jira."
"The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there."
"It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company."
"I don't know the exact pricing, but I think the tool is priced high. They provide quality workmanship, good software, regular upgrades, and they're always attentive and listen to users. Everything comes with a price. I think it's an expensive solution compared to Jira or other competitors, but it's a complete package."
"Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting."
"Rally Software costs $50 a month, and for a base account, that price is acceptable."
"We are always looking for a discount, if the solution was less expensive it would be a benefit."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
904,973 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise113
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Rally Software?
Rally offers many features that help the management of activities, coordination, alignment and reports, which applies agility across the organization. If I were to highlight a particular feature, i...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rally Software?
The setup cost is expensive. I was not responsible for the license part, but it was on a yearly basis.
What needs improvement with Rally Software?
Reporting is my main area of concern. Additionally, the migration activity and portability are important areas for improvement. If I needed to move from Jira to Rally Software, having built-in port...
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Agile Manager, HPE Agile Manager
CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Trizetto, Discount Tire and Siemens
Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: June 2026.
904,973 professionals have used our research since 2012.