No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Agile Manager [EOL] vs Rally Software comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Agile Manager [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rally Software
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
121
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (7th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user739560 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior manager IT at a transportation company
Handles user stories well but the lack of a testing module is a problem
Right now I can't say because other stuff is being migrated to Octane. But basically, the testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all. If they would have added that into it then they wouldn't even need to build Octane. We did have a list of items we wanted to see added but now they are moving all those things to Octane, and we are also interested in Octane now, so we are not looking to request any more changes to AGM, understanding that this is the go-to tool.
Amit Anand - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Technical Architect at HCLSoftware
Drilling into change lifecycles has given me clear end to end traceability for every item
Reporting is my main area of concern. Additionally, the migration activity and portability are important areas for improvement. If I needed to move from Jira to Rally Software, having built-in portability or migration utilities would be beneficial. At the time of my use, there was not an inbuilt capability to migrate applications from other third-party solutions to Rally Software. Currently, I am not using Rally Software.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Integration with HPE ALM/QC, Jenkins and Subversion allows us to view the project’s health through one product."
"Dashboard with release level graphs; it is so easy to gather the progress made at the release with these graphs rather going through each team’s backlogs."
"It has a good sprint task board with the ability to export tasks to Excel and filter by team member, and all the graphs, burndown charts and reporting are user friendly and quick."
"Now we can do shorter cycles and have better traceability, and we have this integration between AGM and ALM, as I said."
"The tool gave great visibility on the project work with real-time analytics and dashboards."
"The transparency this product gives us has been very valuable."
"This solution gives us flexibility in product testing and allows us to get our products with very quick time-to-market."
"It really doesn't need to be as flexible as some other solutions because it's right out of the box, it's relatively easy to use."
"There is a ton of flexibility, I can use it for anything I can think of within the development lifecycle, it is user friendly, and it really helps us with tracking progress so we can see where we’re heading."
"With the agile method, we can break things down to manageable pieces, our deliverables to production have increased as a result, and I can clearly see if we are moving at the speed and in the direction that best serves the business."
"I get to see what we have, what test cases we need to deliver, per release, and it gives us the visibility into what we're doing and how we're doing on a day to day basis, to see if we need to refocus or to try to change things before it gets down into the negative."
"The Defect feature. In one view you can see all your defects and you can push them into the different releases."
"I would recommend it; it is a very good product, very helpful in managing, and pretty good at checking things."
"Efficiency and effectiveness in our processes have improved by 10 percent with this tool."
"It's good only for documenting manual test cases."
"It made it much easier to adopt agile methods of execution."
 

Cons

"There is definitely a maturity curve that Agile Manager needs to go through with. It's still not there, and it definitely needs to grow."
"This product does not fully cover the SDLC. The test team cannot track test cases or connect them with test cases."
"Most of the enhancement requests we have are minor, but the biggest challenge we have is around integrations."
"The user interface could be modernized to be more intuitive and to support more drag/drop functionality."
"Downtime was frequent initially, but now it is much better."
"Understanding of story points and velocity, ease of using reporting/dashboard widgets, and templates for imports need improvement."
"The major drawbacks were in defect management and session sheet creation."
"In the world of Java, it currently supports Eclipse but not NetBeans."
"One area for improvement might be the rigidity in role and access configurations, which require many process changes to fit the tool."
"I'd like the ability to customize reports without having to incur Professional Services, or having to write my own code GitHub and then implement that as a custom report. That's untenable. It's not sustainable."
"Sometimes it's hard for them to quickly search for a user story."
"I would say use cases is an area with room for improvement."
"There are times when we struggle with stuff but we haven't really called customer support yet."
"Workflow is not a strength, we've cobbled together our own workflows around changes in State and Ownership."
"What Agile Central is lacking is more ways to customize notifications and the ability to opt in and out of notifications; this would help with defect tracking as well."
"I'd like to be able to color code timeboxes, so I have an easy visual way to track the success of sprints."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting."
"I understand it's a little more expensive. That is why many people prefer Jira."
"I don't know the exact pricing, but I think the tool is priced high. They provide quality workmanship, good software, regular upgrades, and they're always attentive and listen to users. Everything comes with a price. I think it's an expensive solution compared to Jira or other competitors, but it's a complete package."
"We are always looking for a discount, if the solution was less expensive it would be a benefit."
"Rally Software costs $50 a month, and for a base account, that price is acceptable."
"From a price point, it's a cost effective solution for our needs."
"The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there."
"It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
21%
Healthcare Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Transportation Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise113
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rally Software?
The setup cost is expensive. I was not responsible for the license part, but it was on a yearly basis.
What needs improvement with Rally Software?
Reporting is my main area of concern. Additionally, the migration activity and portability are important areas for improvement. If I needed to move from Jira to Rally Software, having built-in port...
What is your primary use case for Rally Software?
I served as both an end user and administrator. The end-to-end lifecycle traceability is adequate, but the reporting functionality needs to be updated. From a single window, I can drill down and mo...
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Agile Manager, HPE Agile Manager
CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Trizetto, Discount Tire and Siemens
Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: November 2026.
921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.