OpenText Operations Bridge and Amazon CloudWatch compete in the IT operations management category, focusing on monitoring and event management. Amazon CloudWatch holds the upper hand, particularly for AWS environments due to its integration and cost-effective scalability.
Features: OpenText Operations Bridge offers features for event correlation, dashboard customization, and automation, integrating data from applications, networks, and business services, which aids in centralizing data and decision-making. Amazon CloudWatch provides real-time monitoring, seamless AWS integration, and efficient access to detailed metrics through its built-in dashboards, beneficial for AWS-focused users.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Operations Bridge needs to address its complexity, scalability issues, and high costs, with suggestions for a more simplified architecture and better support documentation. Amazon CloudWatch should enhance its dashboard functionality and integration capabilities with non-AWS solutions while improving advanced search and alert features, as reliance on third-party tools limits flexibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Operations Bridge is designed for on-premises and hybrid environments, offering variable customer service experiences depending on the region. Amazon CloudWatch is tailored for public cloud deployments, providing seamless scalability within AWS and generally effective customer service, although challenges arise when integrating with non-AWS components.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Operations Bridge is noted for its high cost and complex licensing model, but its comprehensive integration can result in significant ROI for larger enterprises. Amazon CloudWatch offers a cost-effective pay-as-you-go pricing structure, providing an attractive option for AWS-centric businesses prioritizing budget management.
Amazon CloudWatch offers cost-saving advantages by being an inbuilt solution that requires no separate setup or maintenance for monitoring tasks.
In recent years, due to business expansion, knowledge levels among support engineers seem to vary.
OpenText goes out to bring the right people to answer any inquiries I have.
Amazon CloudWatch's scalability is managed by AWS.
I sometimes notice slowness when Amazon CloudWatch agents are installed on machines with less capacity, causing me to use other monitoring tools.
Maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features.
Amazon CloudWatch charges extra for custom metrics, which is a significant disadvantage.
Splunk is more business-friendly due to its prettier interface.
Amazon CloudWatch charges more for custom metrics as well as for changes in the timeline.
With its automation capabilities and runbooks, it reduces after-hours costs by automatically handling recurring issues and known scenarios.
Amazon CloudWatch allows me to set up and view even historical logs, which is one of the features I find valuable.
I like its filtering capability and its ability to give the cyber engine insights.
This automation significantly reduces manual intervention in ticket handling.
Amazon CloudWatch is used for monitoring, tracking logs, and organizing metrics across AWS services. It detects anomalies, sets dynamic alarms, and automates actions to optimize cloud utilization, troubleshoot, and ensure service availability.
Organizations leverage Amazon CloudWatch for collecting and analyzing logs, triggering alerts, and profiling application performance. It's also employed for monitoring bandwidth, virtual machines, Lambda functions, and Kubernetes clusters. Valuable features include seamless integration with AWS, real-time data and alerts, detailed metrics, and a user-friendly interface. It provides robust monitoring capabilities for infrastructure and application performance, log aggregation, and analytics. Users appreciate its scalability, ease of setup, and affordability. Additional key aspects are the ability to create alarms, dashboards, and automated responses, along with detailed insights into system and application health. Room for improvement includes dashboards and UI enhancements for better visualization and customizability, log streaming speed, advanced machine learning and reporting capabilities, pricing, and integration with non-AWS services and databases. Users also seek more real-time monitoring and comprehensive application performance features, and simpler alerts and configuration processes.
What are the most important features?
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
Amazon CloudWatch is implemented across a range of industries, including technology, finance, healthcare, and retail. Technology firms use it to monitor application performance and traffic, while financial organizations leverage it for ensuring compliance and system reliability. Healthcare entities rely on it for maintaining service availability and monitoring data flow, and retail companies utilize it for tracking customer interactions and optimizing server usage.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.