Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon CloudWatch vs OpenText Operations Bridge comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon CloudWatch
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (12th), Log Management (12th)
OpenText Operations Bridge
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
34th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (8th), IT Operations Analytics (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Amazon CloudWatch is 4.6%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Operations Bridge is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Rasanpreet Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 25, 2023
Reliable AWS monitoring and logging
The choice of logging solution should always be determined by the specific business requirements. It is crucial to align the logging strategy with what type of logs are needed and how they should be used. There are instances where we require custom solutions to retrieve logs, especially application logs that may not be easily accessible through CloudWatch or similar services. When we heavily rely on AWS native services, CloudWatch is indeed a robust choice. However, in certain scenarios, we might need integration capabilities with other tools, and if they can incorporate such features, it would enhance overall logging capabilities. I would rate it eight out of ten.
Volodymyr Bondarchuk - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 29, 2022
Has instrument analysis and anomaly control features that help indicate root causes and problems with your infrastructure
I have experience with other solutions apart from Micro Focus Operations Bridge, for example, NetIQ Operations Center and NetIQ AppManager. I also have experience with network performance monitoring solutions, for example, Microsoft SCOM, and some open-source products, such as Nagios and Zabbix. What makes Micro Focus Operations Bridge better than others is that it works as an umbrella and includes different models for different types of monitoring. At the same time, an open-source product does not give you this kind of functionality. Instead, an open-source product only gives you classic monitoring functionalities in some areas of network performance but not for all areas of monitoring solutions or infrastructure. Microsoft SCOM, at the moment, has many new features, and it's similar to Micro Focus which focuses on network performance and traffic monitoring, so my company uses it together with Micro Focus for monitoring.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our team finds it overall quite useful."
"It offers direct integrations with various storage providers, making it convenient to push logs from CloudWatch to these external platforms."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch is reliability."
"What I found most valuable in Amazon CloudWatch is that it gives you detailed information, which I found helpful because it can even provide you with data for the past one minute, which is quite granular. That was what helped me most in terms of finding the root causes. Task automation is another valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch."
"We have found the pricing to be reasonable."
"You can enable alarms and metrics, and it has robust integration with AWS services. You can also trigger events. For example, if the CPU utilization is above 80%, it can launch a new instance for you."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch is intrusion prevention."
"The tool enables live monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard."
"Flexible dashboard with the availability of widgets."
"I've found the solution to be very scalable."
"It's a very good product overall."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its grouping scripts and event focus."
"We haven't faced any stability issues. There hasn't been any crashes or glitches."
"The Performance Manager provides great insight into our systems' performance."
"The broad integration possibilities, I'd say, with any kind of product, are probably the most valuable feature."
 

Cons

"The dashboard of Amazon CloudWatch is not very customizable right now."
"CloudWatch doesn’t monitor disk throughput by default."
"I would like to monitor inbound and outbound transfer. I would also like to control the traffic for load balancing."
"The technical support must be improved."
"Adding conditional expressions would enhance its functionality."
"We'd like the interface to be as easy as Datadog."
"The solution's auto-scaling could be improved."
"The product should provide more features."
"The solution is overall "heavy", requiring multiple servers, even without HA."
"I'm not aware of areas that need improvement."
"Implementation could be improved."
"The initial setup is a little bit complex."
"Remove the dependency of Java technology. This is a feature used for admin purposes to update the modeling."
"The price is quite expensive, and because of this, we may try another solution."
"pology-based event correlation does not work well with NNM events."
"The pricing could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a free-of-charge service."
"What's were using is the free service of Amazon CloudWatch, so they're not charging us. As for hidden fees, we're not aware of them because we're using what our clients provided us."
"We have monthly licensing costs. The licenses are probably in the vicinity of about $300 - $350/month."
"The pricing is average."
"The price of Amazon CloudWatch is reasonable. When the rate of data collection is done the price will increase. The price is less than other solutions."
"The pricing can be considered reasonable, especially when already operating on a cloud platform."
"The tool is not expensive."
"Its pricing is reasonable. It is sometimes tricky, but it is reasonable as compared to others."
"It is competitive."
"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."
"The cost is very high."
"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."
"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."
"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."
"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
5%
Manufacturing Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon CloudWatch?
In general, Amazon CloudWatch is cheaper compared to Dynatrace. However, there are potential costs to be mindful of, like running a log query that returns trillions of bytes of data.
What needs improvement with Amazon CloudWatch?
There is room for improvement in setting up custom metrics in CloudWatch. Adding conditional expressions would enhance its functionality.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices a...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AirAsia, Airbnb, Aircel, APUS, Avazu, Casa & Video, Futbol Club Barcelona (FCBarcelona), National Taiwan University, redBus
GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon CloudWatch vs. OpenText Operations Bridge and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.