Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs Amazon S3 Glacier comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block S...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Storage (9th)
Amazon S3 Glacier
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Public Cloud Storage Services (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is designed for Cloud Storage and holds a mindshare of 2.1%, up 1.9% compared to last year.
Amazon S3 Glacier, on the other hand, focuses on Public Cloud Storage Services, holds 17.4% mindshare, up 15.3% since last year.
Cloud Storage
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Diverse features and affordability drive effective resource management
Amazon EBS offers diverse features. It can be used for multi-purpose storage, supporting single, multiple, or heavy loads. It has different types for various use cases, allowing me to choose based on my specific requirements. The primary advantage of Amazon EBS is affordability compared to other solutions like EFS or FSX. It acts as a hard drive for servers, making it essential for operation.
Deepak  Nagar - PeerSpot reviewer
A scalable, flexible, and user-friendly solution that is easy to maintain and handle
The solution's initial setup is straightforward and not complex. In the initial legacy, we used to put our servers in our data centers, look for storage, and give a path to that storage. In Amazon S3 Glacier, you can directly put your credentials for the portal login and upload your data.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the features I appreciate about EBS is its persistent storage nature."
"I would recommend Amazon EBS to other people."
"The integration of Amazon EBS with EC2, S3, and Amazon Glacier is seamless and easy, creating a comprehensive cloud environment."
"If EBS is attached to an EC2 instance, it allows secure document storage."
"Amazon EBS is a storage system, and the storage is attached to the servers."
"The product’s most valuable feature is IOPS."
"EBS can handle Apex, which helps us manage many issues. EBS is easy to use and has high performance."
"When I have to change the operating system or delete a host, I can store the data in EBS or assign it to another host."
"It is the most feature-rich platform."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We use the solution for migration."
"The solution is stable."
"The deployment process was straightforward."
"We save money with the product."
"The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3."
 

Cons

"There is a challenge of intermittent reachability with instances, where the product is sometimes available and other times not, which affects the development environment's stability."
"AWS services could improve by including services in the FreeTier, like Route 53 domains or SSL certificates."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"The main challenge with Amazon EBS is cost management, as it is a high-performance volume. Sequencing and IOPS relative to cost are also areas of concern."
"There is a lack of awareness and knowledge about Amazon EBS among potential users, which results in underutilization."
"The features could be improved."
"In Amazon EBS, it is difficult to reduce the space chosen by the customer. The cost increases the moment the size of the storage increases, and I will have to pay for two TB of the tool instead of one TB."
"The setup could be easier."
"The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved."
"The solution's cloud storage is very expensive, and users may not be able to afford cloud storage."
"The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data."
"Billing issues can be a nightmare. It's tough reaching the right person to get them sorted out."
"The solution's pricing is too expensive and could be improved."
"A couple of times, we faced outage issues that caused us problems."
"Amazon S3 Glacier's data retrieval time is slow compared to other AWS storage services and should be improved."
"The stability must be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"What I want Amazon to do is lower the price."
"The solution is quite costly."
"The cost can vary greatly depending on the use case, ranging from one dollar to over $1200 dollars per month."
"It is a cost-effective solution."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low price, and ten is high, I rate the price a seven."
"You need to pay additional costs for support."
"On a scale of one to ten, if one point is a cheap solution and ten points is very expensive, I rate the product price an eight."
"I find the price reasonable for our I environment."
"The pricing is average and reasonable. It varies depending on the region."
"The product is very cheap."
"Amazon S3 Glacier has a good pricing point, and you pay for what's being used."
"The tool is too expensive."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is not an expensive solution, and it has a pay-as-you-go pricing model."
"We pay a monthly licensing fee for Amazon S3 Glacier."
"There is no license, you pay for what you use."
"The pricing must be improved."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
54%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Educational Organization
34%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...
What do you like most about Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store)?
The durability and snapshot capabilities are good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store)?
The cost of Amazon EBS storage is high. I rate the price as eight out of ten. It is expensive to store a lot yet provides significant cost-efficiency as I pay only for the storage time required.
What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?
I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...
What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?
I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage. Additionally, improvements in configuration manage...
What is your primary use case for Amazon S3 Glacier?
Amazon S3 Glacier is primarily used for archiving data. We use it for long-term data storage, especially in industries that require data to be kept for extensive periods, like financial sectors and...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Amazon Glacier
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bazaar Voice, Crowd Strike, Adobe, Gamevil, Hess, CopperEgg, TotalJobs Group, SuperCell, Dropcam, Unilever
King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs. Amazon S3 Glacier and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.