Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Amazon EFS support is well-rated, with users finding documentation helpful and support responsive, though some find AWS support costly.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.4
Amazon EFS needs improved user-friendliness, Windows integration, stability, performance, cost transparency, connectivity, and remote access similar to OneDrive.
No sentiment score available
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud needs better documentation, transparent pricing, high-availability support, smoother integration, and consistent performance.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Amazon EFS is praised for its rapid, scalable performance, supporting varied business sizes, despite minor issues with dynamic scaling.
No sentiment score available
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is praised for efficient, flexible scaling and consistent performance with dynamic storage needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Amazon EFS is generally praised for stability and performance, though some users report occasional glitches and less stability.
No sentiment score available
Users find NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud stable, reliable, highly available, and capable of handling substantial workloads without issue.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.9
Amazon EFS offers scalable, cost-effective, seamless storage with extensive AWS integration, supporting multiple servers and applications requiring consistent file access.
No sentiment score available
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud excels in management, integration, performance, data protection, scalability, pricing, and support.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud provides flexible, predictable pricing with various performance tiers to optimize business spending.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...
Ranking in Cloud Storage
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
File and Object Storage (9th)
NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...
Ranking in Cloud Storage
16th
Average Rating
9.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (14th), Public Cloud Storage Services (19th)
 

Featured Reviews

Shailesh Tripathi - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for storing details of projects and has an easy configuration
I will recommend the product to others. We are partners. Our clients moved from on-premise setup to the cloud. We suggested AWS to them. We have configured the product based on the best practices. We also monitor the solution for recommendations in the Security Hub. We try to get the data encrypted properly within our repository. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
CC
Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time
NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
60%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...
What do you like most about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?
The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?
The product charges are based on the amount of data stored, with different hot and cold storage costs. Cold storage is inexpensive but slower to access.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend
Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.