Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs NGINX Plus comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and F5 are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while F5 is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.4% mindshare in ADC, compared to F5’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of F5 users who would recommend it.

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing

Read 12 Amazon Elastic Load Balancing reviews

1,272 Views
828 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NGINX Plus

Read 28 NGINX Plus reviews

4,885 Views
3,959 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing

NGINX Plus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Elastic Load Balancing and NGINX Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. NGINX Plus Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. NGINX Plus

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NGINX Plus

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Load Balancing is 1.4%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NGINX Plus is 8.5%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

Mridu Boruah

Cloud manager at Baxter International Inc.

Aug 11, 2023

A tool that offers its users resiliency, high availability, and a great scalability

In my company, we use it to post, you know, a variety of business applications, like ERP, finance applications, and legal applications, which we post using EC2 instances The most valuable feature of the solution is its pay-as-you-go model. You don't pay when you shut down the instances. The…

Read full review

Ritesh-Bakhru

Major Account Manager at Check Point Software

Jul 12, 2022

Quick installation and very easy to manage while doing orchestration or automation

NGINX cannot be a replacement for your traditional load balancer with what we use in the network today. However, with applications going toward microservices, NGINX is definitely a way forward. F5 has many traditional load balancing features, so they still need to bring some of those features to NGINX. NGINX is a very basic load balancer and cannot do as many customizations as F5. I think F5 is trying to implement those features in NGINX so they can improve the balancing on NGINX, but I think that will take some time. With the traditional F5 set up, the same OS can do load balancing, firewalls, and even policy enforcement. If we are able to bring some of those capabilities to NGINX, I think it would become a versatile solution and usage would definitely increase.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers good load balancing."

"The feature that I like the most is the scalability. The solutions I build often have many pieces, which are very complicated. If a client comes to me with a design, my developer has made this as a template or a cloud formation script. It's a design on paper, and I want it executed a certain way. I can do that quickly and repeatedly with AWS. That is a considerable advantage because I can take that template and do it five times in different zones. That is an excellent feature based on a template, et cetera."

"Security and monitoring for high-performance applications are some of the top features."

"We use the solution for internet-exposed websites and internal load-balancing purposes."

"The solution is very well integrated into Amazon's services."

"Amazon Elastic Load Balancing transfers the data securely from servers to users and splits the traffic based on peak times."

"It is straightforward to deploy."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Elastic Load Balancing is scaling."

More Amazon Elastic Load Balancing pros

"Zero Downtime has always been a strength in recommending infrastructure web services. NGINX allows me to execute such infrastructure with less complications and the ability to switch from server to server easily."

"The product is resilient."

"The web proxy and the database proxy are excellent."

"I find the solution’s community support and documentation most valuable. Compared to HAProxy, have found a lot of documentation and community support on Quora. If you would be asking me as a developer whether to choose this product, I would recommend this since it has good community support, documentation, and signature updates. The configuration of HAProxy is also very tedious. However, NGINX’s configuration is very simple."

"It performs very well. That's one of the primary reasons we use NGINX."

"With NGINX, I appreciate its ability to route traffic geographically."

"Nginx is simple to configure, very stable in a highly utilized environment and very modular, allowing DevOps to create it's own modules for interactive use with Nginx."

"Its most valuable features are load balancing and application delivery. This is the most efficient application for these features because of stability and its efficiency."

More NGINX Plus pros

Cons

"We faced some issues with the health check."

"One issue that we faced with ALB was that leaf-level certificate validation was not happening. It is not that user-friendly in that aspect."

"Improvement is needed in the integration with Terraform, especially in writing scripts for creating load balancers and target groups."

"The machines created by Amazon Elastic Load Balancing have different IP addresses, which we are not able to whitelist or predict."

"They should improve the solution's pricing."

"It would be good if we had a product that integrates well with third-party vendors. Some of our customers want a multi-cloud solution. They don't want to be tied up to or be in just one cloud."

"The reporting could be simplified so that the client sees a report of what they cached at the end of the month and the number of hits. It should have metrics above and beyond their Google analytics, etc. You can't do that with the solutions from AWS. You have to build sophisticated cloud trails, reports, dashboards, etc. The setup is significant, and it's hard to manage. You'll need to hire someone or pay a consultant on a regular basis to manage it, and it's not for the faint of heart."

"The product should be made as an alternative to Amazon services. It would be easier for us if you got one service that is available everywhere."

More Amazon Elastic Load Balancing cons

"Improvement needed in NGINX Plus could focus on optimizing memory usage for users."

"I would like it to have a more user-friendly graphical interface."

"The scalability could be improved."

"The solution must improve its performance."

"Lack of a feature to print data on the terminal for verification of network traffic during debugging and testing."

"Make modules easier to enable or disable. The beauty and ugly side of the NGINX modules is you have to know how to compile the module. For beginners or non-very technical aspirant(s) going for NGINX, they have to learn how to compile the modules."

"Only improvement needed that I would point to is scalability. With it, I mean clusterized organisation on a low level. At the moment, the best alternative is RHEL HA."

"It would be great if there was even more automation to make it even easier to maintain."

More NGINX Plus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a yearly license."

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is low and I rate it a nine out of ten."

"The product is not cheap."

"I have no issues with the tool's pricing."

"The solution's pricing is $30 per month."

"The licensing fees are based on the number of connections one uses. It is a free tool for a certain amount of connections, which runs into thousands, and after that, there is a certain amount to be paid to Amazon."

"NGINX Plus is an open-source solution with limited additional features. When you try to get additional features in the solution, then you need to pay an extra amount to NGINX Plus."

"The cost is reasonable."

"HAProxy is cheaper than NGINX."

"Nginx is free. I don't have experience with the Plus version."

"The price is the cost to contract support with a specialized company, usually during consulting hours."

"The solution is free, but you can spend a lot of money with a complex solution."

"I am not so happy with their pricing policy, but this is not the worse thing in my life. I can tolerate it."

"NGINX is a free tool in Brazil. There are some companies which do support it."

More NGINX Plus pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

60%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Load Balancing?

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing transfers the data securely from servers to users and splits the traffic based on peak times.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Load Balancing?

The tool could enhance the internal load balancer with better health monitoring. The external load balancer needs more security parameters to protect it from the internet, as it currently lacks pro...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Elastic Load Balancing?

We use the solution for internet-exposed websites and internal load-balancing purposes.

See all answers

Which is better - IIS or NGINX Plus?

IIS is a flexible, secure, and manageable web server to host anything on the web. IIS’s scalable and open architecture can handle the most demanding tasks. From media streaming to web applications,...

See all answers

What do you like most about NGINX Plus?

It performs very well. That's one of the primary reasons we use NGINX.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX Plus?

There's an open-source version of NGINX that is free. There's also NGINX Plus, which is a paid version with additional features.

See all answers

Comparisons

NetScaler vs Amazon Elastic Load Balancing

Compared 48% of the time

HAProxy vs Amazon Elastic Load Balancing

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Amazon Elastic Load Balancing

Compared 26% of the time

More Amazon Elastic Load Balancing Competitors

IIS vs NGINX Plus

Compared 20% of the time

HAProxy vs NGINX Plus

Compared 18% of the time

Kemp LoadMaster vs NGINX Plus

Compared 13% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs NGINX Plus

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Web Server vs NGINX Plus

Compared 8% of the time

More NGINX Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

October 2024

Download Amazon Elastic Load Balancing product report

Buyer's Guide

NGINX Plus

October 2024

Download NGINX Plus product report

Also Known As

No data available

NGINX

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Overview

Elastic Load Balancing automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, containers, IP addresses, and Lambda functions. It can handle the varying load of your application traffic in a single Availability Zone or across multiple Availability Zones. Elastic Load Balancing offers three types of load balancers that all feature the high availability, automatic scaling, and robust security necessary to make your applications fault tolerant.

NGINX Plus is a versatile solution that offers load balancing, caching, proxying, and API deployment capabilities. It can be deployed on private or public clouds and is ideal for building CDN solutions. The solution can also be used to secure web applications and replace web services like Apache.

NGINX has helped organizations improve functioning, reduce downtimes, and offer a DevOps-friendly solution. Its community support and documentation are highly regarded, and its configuration is more straightforward, making it a recommended choice over HAProxy.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Locaweb, AppNexus, Wix, Reliam, Montana Interactive, MuleSoft, Warpwire, Discovery Education, InkaBinka, WordPress.com, Gogo, GOV.UK, NASA

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. NGINX Plus

October 2024

Free Report: Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. NGINX Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. NGINX Plus and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. NGINX Plus report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.