Amazon Kinesis vs Apache Spark Streaming comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Apache are both solutions in the Streaming Analytics category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8, while Apache is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 8.7% mindshare in SA, compared to Apache’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Apache users who would recommend it.

Amazon Kinesis

Read 27 Amazon Kinesis reviews

5,675 Views
4,237 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Apache Spark Streaming

Read 11 Apache Spark Streaming reviews

1,689 Views
1,207 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Amazon Kinesis

Apache Spark Streaming

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apache Spark Streaming and Amazon Kinesis are both prominent contenders in the real-time data processing market. Despite the competitive pricing of Apache Spark Streaming, Amazon Kinesis is preferred due to its superior set of features.

Features: Apache Spark Streaming provides seamless integration with Hadoop ecosystems, fault tolerance, and scalability for complex analytics tasks. On the other hand, Amazon Kinesis offers extensive real-time analytics capabilities, customizable processing, and strong integration with the AWS ecosystem, making it highly adaptable for different use cases.

Room for Improvement: Apache Spark Streaming could enhance user-friendliness for those without extensive expertise, offer improved managed services, and simplify deployment to become more accessible. Amazon Kinesis might benefit from expanded documentation to assist beginners, enhanced integration with non-AWS services, and a reduction in potential costs associated with high data volumes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Kinesis simplifies deployment with a managed service model and provides robust customer support. In contrast, Apache Spark Streaming requires more manual configuration and expertise but offers extensive configuration flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Spark Streaming is cost-effective at the start due to its open-source nature but may incur higher operational costs over time with infrastructure management. Amazon Kinesis involves predictable monthly expenses that can lead to a higher ROI due to its ease of scaling and resource management.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Kinesis vs. Apache Spark Streaming Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Kinesis vs. Apache Spark Streaming

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Kinesis

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Apache Spark Streaming

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Amazon Kinesis is 8.7%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apache Spark Streaming is 2.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Streaming Analytics

Featured Reviews

Rajni Kumar Jha

Senior Software Engineer at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Used for media streaming and live-streaming data

It is not compulsory to use Amazon Kinesis. If you don't want to use the data streaming, you can use just the Kinesis data firehose. Using the Kinesis data firehose is compulsory because we can't store all chats and recordings in Amazon S3 without it. When a call comes in the Amazon Kinesis instance, it will go to Data Streams if we use it. Otherwise, it will go to the Kinesis data firehose, where we need to define the S3 bucket path, and it will go to Amazon S3. So, without the Kinesis data firehose, we can't store all the chats and recordings in Amazon S3. Using Amazon Kinesis totally depends upon the user's requirements. If you want to use live streaming for the data lake or data analyst team, you need to use Amazon Kinesis. If you don't want to use it, you can directly use the Kinesis data firehose, which will be stored in Amazon S3. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

AbhishekGupta

Engineering Leader at Walmart

Easy integration, beneficial auto-scaling, and good open-sourced support community

The service structure of Apache Spark Streaming can improve. There are a lot of issues with memory management and latency. There is no real-time analytics. We recommend it for the use cases where there is a five-second latency, but not for a millisecond, an IOT-based, or the detection anomaly-based. Flink as a service is much better. Apache Spark Streaming does not have auto-tuning. A customer needs to invest a lot, in terms of management and maintenance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Everything is hosted and simple."

"Kinesis is a fully managed program streaming application. You can manage any infrastructure. It is also scalable. Kinesis can handle any amount of data streaming and process data from hundreds, thousands of processes in every source with very low latency."

"The integration capabilities of the product are good."

"The solution has the capacity to store the data anywhere from one day to a week and provides limitless storage for us."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult because we are using the tool on the cloud."

"The management and analytics are valuable features."

"What turns out to be most valuable is its integration with Lambda functions because you can process the data as it comes in. As soon as data comes, you'll fire a Lambda function to process a trench of data."

"Amazon Kinesis also provides us with plenty of flexibility."

More Amazon Kinesis pros

"The solution is better than average and some of the valuable features include efficiency and stability."

"Apache Spark Streaming is versatile. You can use it for competitive intelligence, gathering data from competitors, or for internal tasks like monitoring workflows."

"Spark Streaming is critical, quite stable, full-featured, and scalable."

"Apache Spark Streaming has features like checkpointing and Streaming API that are useful."

"The platform’s most valuable feature for processing real-time data is its ability to handle continuous data streams."

"As an open-source solution, using it is basically free."

"Apache Spark's capabilities for machine learning are quite extensive and can be used in a low-code way."

"Apache Spark Streaming's most valuable feature is near real-time analytics. The developers can build APIs easily for a code-steaming pipeline. The solutions have an ecosystem of integration with other stock services."

More Apache Spark Streaming pros

Cons

"Kinesis is good for Amazon Cloud but not as suitable for other cloud vendors."

"AI processing or cleaning up data would be nice since I don't think it is a feature in Amazon Kinesis right now."

"Something else to mention is that we use Kinesis with Lambda a lot and the fact that you can only connect one Stream to one Lambda, I find is a limiting factor. I would definitely recommend to remove that constraint."

"Kinesis Data Analytics needs to be improved somewhat. It's SQL based data but it is not as user friendly as MySQL or Athena tools."

"The tool should focus on having an alert system rather than having to use a third-party solution."

"There are certain shortcomings in the machine learning capacity offered by the product, making it an area where improvements are required."

"One thing that would be nice would be a policy for increasing the number of Kinesis streams because that's the one thing that's constant. You can change it in real time, but somebody has to change it, or you have to set some kind of meter. So, auto-scaling of adding and removing streams would be nice."

"There could be valid data in Kinesis that is not being processed, which affects stability. Although it rarely happens, this issue has been observed in many deployments, making it not completely stable."

More Amazon Kinesis cons

"Integrating event-level streaming capabilities could be beneficial."

"The cost and load-related optimizations are areas where the tool lacks and needs improvement."

"The debugging aspect could use some improvement."

"We don't have enough experience to be judgmental about its flaws."

"We would like to have the ability to do arbitrary stateful functions in Python."

"In terms of improvement, the UI could be better."

"The initial setup is quite complex."

"The service structure of Apache Spark Streaming can improve. There are a lot of issues with memory management and latency. There is no real-time analytics. We recommend it for the use cases where there is a five-second latency, but not for a millisecond, an IOT-based, or the detection anomaly-based. Flink as a service is much better."

More Apache Spark Streaming cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's entry price is cheap. However, pricing increases with data volume."

"I think for us, with Amazon Kinesis, if we have to set up our own Kafka or cluster, it will be very time-consuming. If one considers the aforementioned aspect, Amazon Kinesis is a cheap tool."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Amazon Kinesis pricing is sometimes reasonable and sometimes could be better, depending on the planning, so it's a five out of ten for me."

"Amazon Kinesis is an expensive solution."

"It was actually a fairly high volume we were spending. We were spending about 150 a month."

"The tool's pricing is cheap."

"The product falls on a bit of an expensive side."

More Amazon Kinesis pricing and cost advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, or not cost-effective, and ten is cheap, I rate the price a seven."

"Spark is an affordable solution, especially considering its open-source nature."

"I was using the open-source community version, which was self-hosted."

"People pay for Apache Spark Streaming as a service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Kinesis?

Amazon Kinesis's main purpose is to provide near real-time data streaming at a consistent 2Mbps rate, which is really impressive.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Kinesis?

Amazon Kinesis is moderately priced. In comparison with other competitors, it is fairly priced, however, if they reduced the price a little, it could add more value to customers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Kinesis?

I do not see any scope for improvement as it does what it is supposed to do. No changes are required. Since it's predominantly a back-end service, any end-user isn't going to interact with it direc...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apache Spark Streaming?

Apache Spark Streaming is versatile. You can use it for competitive intelligence, gathering data from competitors, or for internal tasks like monitoring workflows.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Spark Streaming?

We don't have enough experience to be judgmental about its flaws, as we've only used stable features like batch micro-batch. Integration poses no problem; however, I don't use some features and can...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Spark Streaming?

We use Spark Streaming in a micro-batch region. It's not a full real-time system, but it offers high performance and low latency.

See all answers

Comparisons

Confluent vs Amazon Kinesis

Compared 30% of the time

Azure Stream Analytics vs Amazon Kinesis

Compared 23% of the time

Apache Flink vs Amazon Kinesis

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon MSK vs Amazon Kinesis

Compared 9% of the time

Redpanda vs Amazon Kinesis

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon Kinesis Competitors

Apache Pulsar vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 24% of the time

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 22% of the time

Azure Stream Analytics vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 14% of the time

Apache Flink vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 10% of the time

Starburst Enterprise vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 9% of the time

More Apache Spark Streaming Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Kinesis

April 2025

Download Amazon Kinesis product report

Buyer's Guide

Streaming Analytics

March 2025

Download Apache Spark Streaming product report

Also Known As

Amazon AWS Kinesis, AWS Kinesis, Kinesis

Spark Streaming

Overview

Amazon Kinesis makes it easy to collect, process, and analyze real-time, streaming data so you can get timely insights and react quickly to new information. Amazon Kinesis offers key capabilities to cost-effectively process streaming data at any scale, along with the flexibility to choose the tools that best suit the requirements of your application. With Amazon Kinesis, you can ingest real-time data such as video, audio, application logs, website clickstreams, and IoT telemetry data for machine learning, analytics, and other applications. Amazon Kinesis enables you to process and analyze data as it arrives and respond instantly instead of having to wait until all your data is collected before the processing can begin.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Spark Streaming makes it easy to build scalable fault-tolerant streaming applications.

Apache

Sample Customers

Zillow, Netflix, Sonos

UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, Alibaba Taobao, Kenshoo, eBay Inc.

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Kinesis vs. Apache Spark Streaming

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon Kinesis vs. Apache Spark Streaming

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Kinesis vs. Apache Spark Streaming and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Kinesis vs. Apache Spark Streaming report.

See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.