Apigee vs OpenLegacy comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Google and OpenLegacy are both solutions in the API Management category. Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenLegacy is ranked #32. Google holds a 6.7% mindshare in APIM, compared to OpenLegacy’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenLegacy users who would recommend it.

Apigee

Read 90 Apigee reviews

14,354 Views
13,780 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenLegacy

Read 5 OpenLegacy reviews

2,684 Views
1,584 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Apigee

OpenLegacy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apigee and OpenLegacy are competing API management platforms. Apigee has the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and robust customer support, appealing to enterprises with complex API needs, while OpenLegacy is favored for cost-effectiveness and legacy system integration.

Features: Apigee offers API analytics, developer management, and security features, suitable for enterprises with complex API requirements. OpenLegacy provides specialized integration for legacy systems, aiding in the modernization of outdated infrastructures. Apigee has a comprehensive suite of management tools compared to OpenLegacy's focus on legacy integration.

Room for Improvement: Apigee could improve its pricing to offer more cost-effective solutions for businesses with budget constraints. Another area is simplifying integration to enhance ease of use. Additionally, expanding its legacy system compatibility could attract more businesses. OpenLegacy can enhance its customer support to match Apigee's robust service. Its analytics capabilities might be expanded for better performance tracking, and improving cloud deployment options could increase its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apigee offers cloud-based deployment facilitating rapid setup with scalable solutions, benefiting cloud-first enterprises with robust customer service support. OpenLegacy's hybrid deployment model allows organizations to use existing on-premises investments with cloud capabilities, highlighting its flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Apigee's setup costs are higher due to a comprehensive feature set, providing substantial ROI through operational efficiency and extensive support. OpenLegacy offers a cost-effective initial setup, ensuring excellent ROI for companies focused on modernizing legacy systems within budget constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed Apigee vs. OpenLegacy Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. OpenLegacy

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,069 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apigee

Ranking in API Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (11th)

OpenLegacy

Ranking in API Management

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (60th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apigee is 6.7%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenLegacy is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apigee	6.7%
OpenLegacy	1.4%
Other	91.9%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Amandeep Pawar

Senior Engineer at Airy Software Technologies Private Limited

Centralized API gateway has improved microservice security and provided deep traffic analytics

Apigee's API gateway could be improved. There are some limitations for high throughputs, which we can address. Overall, Apigee is a robust API management platform where we can configure centralized traffic management, but there are a few areas for improvement. The developer experience could be more intuitive, especially for configurations and complex API proxies and policies. Debugging production issues can sometimes be challenging, so more detailed diagnostic and easier-to-use troubleshooting tools would be valuable. The analytics dashboard could offer more customization and deeper insights without requiring additional configuration. Simplifying pricing and licensing would make Apigee more accessible for smaller organizations. I would like better support for cloud-native deployments, Kubernetes integrations, and AI-assisted policy recommendations. I would also like to see AI-assisted troubleshooting, more customizable analytics and developer portal, better enterprise documentation, easier policy configuration, and a simplified licensing model to enhance both the developer experience and day-to-day operations.

Read full review

reviewer1042905

VP, Chief Enterprise Integration Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The biggest advantage is how simple the technology was.

I'd like to see OpenLegacy develop its low-code/no-code (LCNC) solutions. They've expanded somewhat their horizons for integration beyond mainframe CICS, which is their sweet spot. They have some tooling in that area, but it's not as good as it needs to be. OpenLegacy handles the bread-and-butter TP monitoring stuff, but I am working for one of the six banks in the United States still using the Hogan mainframe, which has a slightly proprietary mechanism. But OpenLegacy currently doesn't have a connector for Hogan. So it would help if they could build one. That would appeal to financial institutions that still use Hogan, like US Bank, Wells Fargo, KeyBank, and Vanguard.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apigee is a strong-featured solution, it leads in Gartner Quadrant ratings, and it is a full-slated API solution that has the features that an API gateway requires."

"The opportunity for customization is really vast and it is a really good feature built into the product."

"It accelerates development and deployment processes."

"Apigee is a pioneer in the industry and has good features and functionalities. It is a good tool for API management and it has more advancements than all other tools in the market in certain areas."

"The flexibility allows you to quickly run a cloud-native application architecture."

"The scalability is incredible."

"If customers are trying to do long-term planning, and want to apply monetization on their APIs, then Apigee will be the best in this situation."

"Implementation success would depend on having a good API architecture and design, using analytics, and following best practices of the lifecycle management provided by tool."

More Apigee pros

"Without OpenLegacy, it would take us several months to create the same services."

"Using mainframe programs (not screens), the OpenLegacy services do not require any changes by the mainframe programmers, thus reducing development cycles."

"The product has helped our business by allowing us to become more efficient in data handling."

"It is possible to solve larger legacy API issues on an enterprise level with this product."

"OpenLegacy provides a way to go from the outside world to the legacy mainframe, to move the old standard application to a REST API application. New digital services can be created in a few clicks and this can be done easily by COBOL programmers."

"OpenLegacy produces a war file which includes everything you need to deploy a Tomcat server."

"OpenLegacy opens the door to connect modern web products to our old legacy system."

"The speed of development of production, especially in specific environments like IBM mainframes, has been valuable."

More OpenLegacy pros

Cons

"Apigee is costlier compared to other solutions. For government organizations, especially those that do not want cloud-based solutions and prefer on-premise implementations, we recommend WSO2 due to its cost-effectiveness and suitability for private cloud environments."

"I am still struggling to understand how we can use Apigee as a hybrid system. The pricing of this solution could also be improved as there are multiple new products coming onto the market at competitive price points."

"The user interface could be better. It could be easier to navigate and more user-friendly."

"iPaaS is something that we would like to see. For example, MuleSoft is kind of an integrated platform as a service (iPaaS), and it provides a lot of out-of-the-box connectors and other such things. This is where Apigee lacks. I'm not sure if that's the roadmap for Apigee, but any improvements on those lines would be helpful where things become easier to implement."

"Since it is based on various open sourced projects, we might have to depend on the fixes provided by those components rather than Apigee directly fixing the issues."

"The pricing for the product was a bit higher. I also found it challenging to manage sometimes."

"Compared to its competitors, such as Axway AMPLIFY API Management and Layer7 API Management, Apigee could benefit from having more policies to cater to various use cases. This would reduce the need for writing custom JavaScripts. If more features come straight out of the box, we can leverage them instead of writing custom code to achieve the same functionality."

"GCP is improving the regular version control. There have been some challenges when we talk about the hybrid deployment model. For example, some runtime services' data was available only on the cloud, but financial institutions and other customers have requested more on-site data storage. This is especially important in regions where Google data centers are unavailable, such as certain areas in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East."

More Apigee cons

"Customer support for the product is slow and not very good. It makes using the product difficult if you need help quickly."

"We would also be more than happy if the product had the option to work in the opposite direction – the ability to consume REST/SOW services in the outer world from the mainframe."

"I'd like to see OpenLegacy develop its low-code/no-code (LCNC) solutions. They've expanded somewhat their horizons for integration beyond mainframe CICS, which is their sweet spot. They have some tooling in that area, but it's not as good as it needs to be."

"The pricing of the solution could be more flexible and allow for once-off payment versus annual licensing. This would be more appealing to companies in Latin America."

"Debugging and logging for programmers could be better."

"I would like to see SSL out-of-the-box. OpenLegacy certainly does SSL, but it was not the default for our use case. We are currently working with OpenLegacy to cross the SSL bridge and suspect that most users will want to do the same."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other products, Apigee had higher pricing."

"My clients pay for a license."

"The solution is a bit expensive. It's not for organizations in the early stages of their lifecycle but is more suited for mid- to enterprise-level platforms. Pricing varies by deployment model, with SaaS being the cheapest, costing around $100,000 per year for a subscription. For hybrid and on-prem deployments, the price increases. The on-prem model includes a license and additional installation and configuration professional service costs, which can be at least $40,000 to $60,000 for the initial setup. While it's not cheap, it offers long-term value and can be worthwhile."

"The product's pricing is fair. You need to pay additional costs for the support."

"If the budget is not a concern then I will choose to go with Apigee over WSA-2, but if it is then I would prefer the latter solution."

"It is more expensive when you compare to open-source products or other vendors."

"Since it was acquired by Google, we can get a license based on our requirements and the cost level will depend on cloud access and support."

"It was fairly expensive. I don't know what the standard pricing is. I want to say that it's something like $80,000 for 800 million requests (approximately) a year."

More Apigee pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of the solution could be more flexible and allow for once-off payment versus annual licensing. This would be more appealing to companies in Latin America."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

24%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	67

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apigee?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apigee

Compared 27% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Apigee

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Apigee

Compared 5% of the time

More Apigee Competitors

IBM DataPower Gateway vs OpenLegacy

Compared 18% of the time

Pipedream vs OpenLegacy

Compared 10% of the time

IBM API Connect vs OpenLegacy

Compared 9% of the time

Fiorano API Management vs OpenLegacy

Compared 8% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs OpenLegacy

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenLegacy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apigee

September 2026

Download Apigee product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenLegacy

August 2026

Download OpenLegacy product report

Overview

Apigee offers API management, analytics, and developer portals with robust security, scalability, and flexibility. Its hybrid deployment ensures data privacy, while analytics tools support insightful decision-making, making it suitable for organizations seeking comprehensive API solutions.

Apigee provides a seamless platform for managing APIs, integrating external and internal applications. It serves as an API gateway, featuring robust security and scalability, supporting OAuth and rate-limiting policies. Organizations appreciate its ease of use, integration capabilities, and documented resources. The hybrid deployment model ensures private data remains on-premise, while the orchestration layer increases security. With a drag-and-drop interface and customization options, policy management becomes straightforward. Its analytics and monitoring tools offer insights into traffic patterns and API performance. However, users desire improvements in role-based access, code versioning integration, and traffic handling. Suggestions include enhanced security, support, automation, and a more flexible pricing model.

What are Apigee's Key Features?

API Management: Simplifies API exposure and manages internal and external APIs efficiently.
Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns and API performance for informed decision-making.
Security: Enforces OAuth, rate-limiting, and other protocols to secure data.
Developer Portals: Supports developer onboarding with comprehensive tools and documentation.
Hybrid Deployment: Ensures data privacy by keeping sensitive information on-premise.

What Benefits Can Organizations Gain from Apigee?

Ease of Use: Streamlined integration and policy management with a drag-and-drop interface.
Scalability: Adapts to increase in traffic and ensures performance consistency.
Flexibility: Offers customizable options to suit unique API management needs.
Comprehensive Insights: Analytics tools for monitoring API performance and user engagement.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, Apigee is extensively used for developing proxies, implementing security protocols, and managing APIs. Organizations leverage its capabilities to facilitate seamless API interactions, fostering developer onboarding and API customization. The platform supports API gateways for enhanced security, scalability, and insights, proving crucial for managing extensive application networks.

Google

OpenLegacy integrates legacy customer data with REST APIs, speeding up mobile transactions and code updates while simplifying API development. Its open-source platform offers flexibility, benefiting mainframe environments and Tomcat server deployments.

OpenLegacy is crucial for organizations aiming to integrate modern web applications with legacy systems. The platform is widely used in financial and logistics sectors to enable quick access to customer data and transactions, effectively monetizing mainframe assets. By facilitating the rapid creation of numerous APIs, OpenLegacy supports seamless interactions between applications, allowing modern web form inputs into legacy systems. Its flexibility and extensive capabilities simplify API development and deployment, proving valuable for those managing day-to-day banking and transaction data. However, room for improvement includes better debugging, logging, SSL integration, flexible pricing options, and support availability, especially for Hogan mainframe users.

What features define OpenLegacy?

REST API Integration: Facilitates integration with mobile transactions.
Faster Code Updates: Delivers efficiency in code changes for mainframe environments.
Open-Source Flexibility: Offers customization and broad capabilities.
Tomcat Deployment: Supports straightforward deployment via Tomcat servers.
Rapid API Development: Enables swift creation of multiple APIs.

What ROI benefits should users expect?

Legacy System Monetization: Transforms mainframe assets into profit.
Improved Integration: Enhances access to critical customer data and transactions.
Efficient Operations: Streamlines daily banking and transaction management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Flexibility and open-source nature reduce expenses.
Enhanced Interoperability: Allows seamless interaction between old and new applications.

Financial and logistics companies leverage OpenLegacy to link web applications with legacy systems, ensuring quick customer data and transaction access. This integration supports rapid solution building and efficient management of banking and transaction data, particularly benefiting institutions like US Bank and Wells Fargo needing comprehensive Hogan mainframe connectors.

OpenLegacy

Sample Customers

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson

Many of openLegacy's global customers are among the Global 100 companies. Review case studies in these industries: Agriculture, Airport Authority, Automotive, Auto, Finance, Insurance, Government, Healthcare, Manufacturing, and Retailwww.openlegacy.com/case-studie...

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. OpenLegacy

August 2026

Free Report: Apigee vs. OpenLegacy

Find out what your peers are saying about Apigee vs. OpenLegacy and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apigee vs. OpenLegacy report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.