AppDynamics Server Monitoring vs ScienceLogic comparison

AppDynamics Server Monitoring

Read 42 ScienceLogic reviews

2,300 Views
1,710 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and AppDynamics are prominent products in the infrastructure and application monitoring category. ScienceLogic takes the upper hand with its extensive customization features, whilst AppDynamics shines in ease of implementation and real-time diagnostics.

Features: ScienceLogic stands out with dynamic apps, customizable dashboards, and multi-tenant environments which cater to complex monitoring needs. Its event correlation capabilities and automation increase operational efficiency. The platform's flexibility supports a wide array of infrastructure requirements. AppDynamics excels in ease of implementation, dynamic baselining, and provides robust end-to-end monitoring capabilities. It is particularly effective in real-time diagnostics and sophisticated transaction monitoring, which strengthens its server management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic needs to simplify its interface and enhance reporting capabilities, as well as improve integration with APIs. More self-service features would enhance user experience. Conversely, AppDynamics faces challenges in better pricing schemes and enhancing integration with custom applications. Its initial setup and analytics can be more streamlined to avoid user difficulties. Both platforms should aim to expand their support for more technologies and improve user accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic offers diverse deployment options across on-premises and various cloud environments, suitable for organizations with complex infrastructures. It is praised for exceptional customer service, characterized by responsiveness and knowledgeable support. AppDynamics provides flexibility with hybrid and cloud environments, though it could improve response times and quality for certain technical issues, despite high customer service ratings. Both aim to balance robust deployment capabilities with effective customer support.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's pricing is based on device count and monitoring tiers, which can be flexible or expensive for larger deployments, but offers good ROI in reducing downtime and resolving problems. AppDynamics is generally considered costly, potentially hindering smaller organizations, but offers value for money with its strong negotiation practices. It provides a good ROI by enhancing efficiency in troubleshooting and reducing time spent on major issues. Both platforms deliver significant business value when utilized effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed AppDynamics Server Monitoring vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: January 2025).

AppDynamics Server Monitoring vs. ScienceLogic

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AppDynamics Server Monitoring

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (30th), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (21st), AIOps (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of AppDynamics Server Monitoring is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rahul -Jain

SDET ANALYST SENIOR at TSYS

User-friendly and provides good response time from the end-to-end server

We are not using the alerts as we have different mechanisms called resilience testing or kiosk testing. The DevOps team uses the alerts. During production, they will get alerts when they see the CPU utilization going beyond the 60% or 70% benchmark they have set. AppDynamics and Dynatrace are the only two tools that provide accurate or stable end-to-end response time. These two tools can show you everything that's going on from the back end. If we are doing performance testing or any testing, these two tools can provide us with every detail about what's happening in the back end from the server side that we can't see. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

GauravSingh4

CEO at Parker Digital

Great integrations, power flow, and good support

They need a little more self-service. Some of the places where there's still a dependency on defense logic. If those could be eliminated, that would be ideal. They've done a fantastic job eliminating a lot of those dependencies and there's a lot of self-service. However, some of the areas where we could have it connect to, for example, Splunk or ServiceNow, in a self-care version versus having to go back to their engineers, that's an area where they could do a little more. There are still a lot of engineers who get involved versus if it's a little more API-driven and self-served dashboard connections. Doing it the other way would just make life easier for users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like Business iQ the most, so far. It has great analytics configurations and I can get real-time updates. We have eCommerce releases every week. So the one use case that I use Business iQ is to compare before and after release performance using AppDynamics."

"We can view the server activities, including issues in the process, with a single click."

"Setting up the monitoring agents was straightforward."

"What I like most about AppDynamics Server Monitoring is that it's easy to manipulate and easy to implement. All solutions have the same features, but what sets AppDynamics Server Monitoring apart is that it's really quick to implement. AppDynamics Server Monitoring has a great interface. As a developer, it doesn't matter whether it's SolarWinds, Dynatrace, or any APM you're using, but it would matter to the customer. A product must be easy to manipulate or use, for example, AppDynamics Server Monitoring, for the customer, but for developers like my team, there's no pressure, even if a solution requires coding."

"The auto-discovery of the logs is the most valuable feature. It requires minimal configuration, we just need to set up on once and it automatically detects through the code."

"The platform is reliable in identifying the core system issues."

"The product provides a nice end-user experience."

"The event alerting feature or the trigger system is what I like most about AppDynamics Server Monitoring. Whenever an issue occurs, the tool automatically generates an even trigger that tells engineers in the company to take action, so it's an essential feature of AppDynamics Server Monitoring. Another valuable feature of the tool is end-to-end monitoring, which means if you need to debug, you can go transaction by transaction, where the issue lies, and how it's linked. For example, if it's a low-performance issue, you can look into it more through AppDynamics Server Monitoring in terms of which area takes too much time to execute. You can also see the SQL queries and the kind of query going on through the tool."

More AppDynamics Server Monitoring pros

"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."

"It is simple."

"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"In the next release, I would like to see the configuration of the data and more support for new applications. It should support new languages."

"An area for improvement in AppDynamics Server Monitoring is integration; in particular, it needs a better way to integrate with custom applications such as Siebel CRM. Right now, it's challenging to integrate AppDynamics Server Monitoring with Siebel CRM because it sometimes gives an error and cannot integrate properly."

"If we consider the implementation of alternative solutions, such as Dynatrace, there is a notable difference in the approach to agent-based service monitoring. For instance, Dynatrace employs a single-agent solution, which can pose security concerns. When installing Dynatrace, granting the agent ld pro payload rights is a requirement. In contrast, our solution ensures a more secure approach by not requiring root and administration access. While we currently utilize an agent-based solution, there may be a shift in the next one or two years, possibly with the adoption of Open Telemetry. It's anticipated that many APM vendors, including Dynatrace, may alter their structure or strategy for implementation. However, as of now, the trend is towards an increasing number of implementations daily."

"The product’s dashboard could be more easy to implement."

"AppDynamics Server Monitoring has room for improvement in terms of pricing. If the price could be cheaper, it would be great for both the customer and the integrator. What I'd like to see in the next release of AppDynamics Server Monitoring is a better dashboard for the customer. The dashboard should be more interactive."

"I would like the ability to choose from some pre-defined dashboards and reports because as it is now, you have to define them separately for each implementation."

"The solution’s setup is a bit complex."

"I could not find a user-friendly interface for querying, and analytics sometimes gives the wrong results...I feel that analytics could have been better in searching and running the analytical queries."

More AppDynamics Server Monitoring cons

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has a high cost."

"AppDynamics Server Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"The tool is expensive."

"The licensing cost is fairly high"

"AppDynamics Server Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"The pricing for AppDynamics Server Monitoring in Africa and the Middle East is too expensive, so it's very hard to sell it to customers. If there could be different pricing or package for the region, that would be great. My company pays for the license of AppDynamics Server Monitoring on a per-agent, per-server basis. It's $700 to $1000 per server, and it's paid annually. My company is on a subscription model for the solution. On a scale of one to five, where one is expensive and five is cheap, my rating for the price of AppDynamics Server Monitoring is a two."

"AppDynamics Server Monitoring is a very expensive product, but if you negotiate well, you get value for money...My company used to make early payments toward the licensing costs of the solution, but now my company has opted for a different licensing model."

"My understanding is that the price of this solution is quite high, compared to other products."

More AppDynamics Server Monitoring pricing and cost advice

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AppDynamics Server Monitoring?

The platform is reliable in identifying the core system issues.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics Server Monitoring?

AppDynamics Server Monitoring is an expensive solution. The solution costs 5,000 per user.

What needs improvement with AppDynamics Server Monitoring?

The solution's pricing could be improved and made more competitive.

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required. The tool is more or less good. The tool needs to improve its APM capabilities.

OpsRamp vs AppDynamics Server Monitoring

Comparisons

Compared 33% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs AppDynamics Server Monitoring

Compared 28% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs AppDynamics Server Monitoring

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs AppDynamics Server Monitoring

Compared 13% of the time

BigPanda vs AppDynamics Server Monitoring

Compared 13% of the time

More AppDynamics Server Monitoring Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 15% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 11% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

AppDynamics Server Monitoring

January 2025

Download AppDynamics Server Monitoring product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

December 2024

Learn More

Video not available

AppDynamics

Overview

Application-centric server monitoring in context of your business transactions to proactively isolate and resolve application performance issues faster with actionable, correlated application-server metrics.

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Sony, DirecTV, UBS, The Container Store, The Neta Porter Group, Nasdaq, Cisco, eHarmony, Hallmark, Overstock, Expedia

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell