Automic Automation vs BMC TrueSight Server Automation comparison

The compared Broadcom and BMC solutions aren't in the same category. Broadcom is ranked #4 in WA , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 6.6% mindshare in the category. BMC is ranked #12 in CM , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of BMC users who would recommend it.

Automic Automation

Read 92 Automic Automation reviews

4,402 Views
2,250 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

BMC TrueSight Server Automa...

Read 19 BMC TrueSight Server Automation reviews

1,984 Views
1,346 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Automic Automation

BMC TrueSight Server Automa...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Automation and BMC TrueSight Server Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Redwood Software, Tidal Software by Redwood and others in Workload Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 801,394 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Automic Automation

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (4th)

BMC TrueSight Server Automa...

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (12th)

Mindshare comparison

Automic Automation and BMC TrueSight Server Automation aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Automic Automation is designed for Workload Automation and holds a mindshare of 6.6%, up 6.3% compared to last year.
BMC TrueSight Server Automation, on the other hand, focuses on Configuration Management, holds 3.0% mindshare, up 2.7% since last year.

Workload Automation

Configuration Management

Featured Reviews

Bernd Stroehle.

Enterprise Architect at KosaKya

Nov 21, 2023

Offers excellent functionality, reduces job and workload failure, and enhances our compliance processes

Due to Automic Workload Automation's proprietary scripting language, upgrading it can be extremely challenging, unlike other workflow automation products that offer seamless migration. This inflexibility makes Automic Workload Automation the most complex and restrictive solution in the market. Choosing Automic Workload Automation essentially locks us into their ecosystem, making it nearly impossible to switch to a different product. Therefore, I strongly advise against using Automic Workload Automation. Automic Workload Automation's AI capabilities are limited. Most traditional workflow products lack robust support for AI workflows. Airflow might be a suitable option for AI workflows. However, if real-time AI processing is required, a different product altogether is necessary. For example, in the field of genetics, if a workflow involves thousands of jobs, traditional workflow products such as Automic Workload Automation may struggle to handle such a large workload. The maximum capacity of these products might be around 1,000 or 2,000 jobs. In contrast, a genetic workflow could involve up to 100,000 jobs, requiring a completely different workflow product specifically designed for such large-scale processing. Mainstream workflow products like Automic Workload Automation offer similar functionalities and are widely used around the globe. These products typically check for process completion every second. However, in high-performance computing and emerging fields like medicine or ophthalmology, we need to control thousands of jobs simultaneously, requiring millisecond-level process completion checks. To achieve this, we can store event data in databases or perform on-the-fly checks. Additionally, we need to integrate workflow control with workload management to prevent machine overload. These requirements make it unsuitable for tasks like controlling genomic workflows.

Read full review

Mohamed Kamel

Datacenter & Infrastructure Senior Engineer at BMB

Mar 11, 2023

Easy to deploy, automatic patching, and scalable

When trying to gather a large amount of data, such as multiple server data, there is no specific option to populate the data and export it to Excel, which is required. For example, when running a patch analysis job to find how many packages are missing on servers and which have been installed, it is difficult to get individual server data in an Excel format, so manual work is needed. Additionally, when exporting the report of a script, such as one to check if the firewall is on or not, it is difficult to extract the data from the solution if there are multiple servers. There is no other functionality available to patch the containers that we need to include. I believe many teams have been moving towards containerization. In certain cases, if vulnerabilities are found during our hybrid assessment, there is no easy way to fix them specifically. I would like to have the ability to run the Ansible playbooks in the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have seen improvements in time efficiency and cost resources, because we are mainly focused on the SAP area, and its automation in that part."

"Since we bought it, we have not had any big issues. We are satisfied with it. We are able to run multiple jobs. We can build and run complicated jobs. There are no issues."

"The functionality is great, the scripting language is very powerful. They can adapt to most use cases. Very good community of different companies and a user base so when we have problems we can go to other people."

"It will increase all delivery due to an impact on efficiency, in terms of time and faster resources."

"We have a lot of governance and compliance requirements as a bank that we can fulfill with this product."

"I have found new methods for converting scripts from Dollar U to ONE Automation. For example, I take the dynamic library from Dollar U and put it in the dynamic binary library in ONE Automation. This enables us to use Dollar U scripts in ONE Automation."

"The user interface is very simple and straightforward."

"It's easy to train other people. A new developer could come in and learn it very quickly."

More Automic Automation pros

"You can easily get the patching link. Patches can be deployed easily with a single click, making deployment straightforward. This eliminates the need for constant monitoring. You can deploy the necessary patches with one click, ensuring everything is signed correctly, and all issues are resolved."

"As this solution provides strong support and has multiple use cases, it is worth the cost."

"Scalability is good."

"It makes deployment easier and allows us to put restrictions on the server using role-based authorization."

"The product's valuable feature is its ability to conduct patching for multiple servers simultaneously."

"Compliance is also huge... By tying it to Atrium Orchestrator, our workflow tool, we'll be able to have a closed loop where we identify a compliance issue, cut CRs, get them approved, and then be able to execute these CRs and more seamlessly fix these issues on the fly."

"The best feature of the solution is patch automation."

"Technical support is good."

More BMC TrueSight Server Automation pros

Cons

"I hope going forward they will make some changes to the documentation. I hope they will write into the documentation what has changed and what the new names are. For example, some features have a new name. I hope they will make a translation the names in the old version to the names in the newer version."

"An area for improvement would be SQL performance. While tracing SQL traffic, we noticed a lot of commands that cause contention/locks as well as forced waits. The efficiency of the SQL could be greatly improved (in some cases by simply replacing nested Selects and using NOLOCK hints)."

"The hotline can take a long time. They will say, "I will take it and give it to the Level 2 support.""

"I would like to see more stability in the product and have the transition between versions be more seamless."

"The manage file transfer area could be better. The file transfer area needs improvement. Other products like Control-M have some good features in this area."

"In terms of what can be improved, we are in Israel, so we work in Hebrew. Now they are starting to move it also from English to Hebrew and to support the language, but for us it has been very difficult because the Hebrew looks like gibberish. So there are language issues."

"The calendar with the new version is a little bit goofy."

"There is one missing part in the product concerning recurring tasks. You can schedule a recurring task by a context action, and run it as recurrent, but it creates a time container which can be quit and disappears."

More Automic Automation cons

"I would like to see a better methodology for handling REST calls and integration into the APIs. They add new APIs as they add functions, but they've missed some from older components which they still haven't added in. Some of the APIs are there but the CLI calls are not there."

"I would like to see more container integration in the next release of this solution."

"We encountered some reporting issues. Also, we needed to gather information from the backend before the product execution. The output's format is not good."

"There is no other functionality available to patch the containers that we need to include."

"Provisioning needs to be more user-friendly. We were using BladeLogic for provisioning, but due to a lot of issues and complications, we had to stop using provisioning with this tool."

"Resource management on the base servers is sluggish and could be improved."

"More use cases can be automated. The user interface of BMC TrueSight Server Automation could benefit from enhancements, as it currently lacks refinement."

"The architecture is big, so the initial setup is not a straightforward task."

More BMC TrueSight Server Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the solution depends on the number of systems that are being orchestrated."

"We receive time efficiency from this product."

"The pricing keeps going up, which is concerning."

"It costs too much. That's why we are now looking at other products."

"It has helped us reduce costs."

"Its price is way up there with BMC. It is a little bit on the expensive side."

"There are different licensing fees for cases where high availability is important."

"The cost of arrays is high. If you want to buy an array for an application, and see value from it, you need about half a million dollars. That is too expensive."

More Automic Automation pricing and cost advice

"The product's pricing depends on the number of servers."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"The product is expensive."

"Licensing is a bit pricey. Be mindful about the components that you need and buy as appropriate."

"We're looking at less than $100,000 USD for this solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automic Workload Automation?

It is easy to manage complex workloads and use electronic workflow automation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automic Workload Automation?

The solution seems expensive to me, but it does the job well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automic Workload Automation?

The support has declined somewhat over the years due to various takeovers. It's not as personal as it used to be.

See all answers

What do you like most about BMC TrueSight Server Automation?

The product's valuable feature is its ability to conduct patching for multiple servers simultaneously.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC TrueSight Server Automation?

The solution is expensive. It has perpetual licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC TrueSight Server Automation?

More use cases can be automated. The user interface of BMC TrueSight Server Automation could benefit from enhancements, as it currently lacks refinement. However, the stability of the platform is c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs Automic Automation

Compared 31% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Automation

Compared 18% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Automation

Compared 12% of the time

Dollar Universe Workload Automation vs Automic Automation

Compared 10% of the time

AppWorx Workload Automation vs Automic Automation

Compared 7% of the time

More Automic Automation Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs BMC TrueSight Server Automation

Compared 54% of the time

BigFix vs BMC TrueSight Server Automation

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs BMC TrueSight Server Automation

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs BMC TrueSight Server Automation

Compared 10% of the time

Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM vs BMC TrueSight Server Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More BMC TrueSight Server Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Automation

September 2024

Download Automic Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

BMC TrueSight Server Automation

September 2024

Download BMC TrueSight Server Automation product report

Also Known As

Automic Dollar Universe

TrueSight Server Automation, BladeLogic Server Automation, BladeLogic Automation Suite

Learn More

Broadcom

BMC

Overview

Automic Automation is employed for migration assistance, digital business automation, integration with platforms, ITIL process workflows, batch processing, disaster recovery, scheduling ERP batch jobs, and automation within finance and telecom sectors.

Businesses implement Automic Automation across on-premises and cloud infrastructures, supporting SAP, mainframes, host systems, and other environments. Valued for its versatility and out-of-the-box integration capabilities, it enhances automation efficiency and reduces operational costs. The platform is known for its robust object-oriented workflow, zero-downtime upgrades, CI/CD pipeline integration, and multi-client architecture. Enhanced stability, scalability, user-friendliness, and compliance are notable benefits.

What are the key features?

Versatile Scheduler: Manage complex schedules effortlessly.
Object-Oriented Workflow: Robust and flexible workflow management.
Zero-Downtime Upgrades: Continuous operation without interruptions.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless incorporation into development pipelines.
Multi-Client Architecture: Supports diverse and multiple client environments.
Unique Scripting Language: Enhances customizability and automation.
Predictive Analytics: Improved job execution and performance insights.
Intuitive GUI: Simplifies job and workflow management.

What benefits or ROI should be evaluated?

Enhanced Stability: Reliable operations across environments.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing business needs.
Reduced Operational Costs: Streamlined automation processes lower expenses.
Compliance Assurance: Ensures adherence to regulations and standards.

Automic Automation is widely used in finance and telecom industries, addressing unique challenges and demands. It integrates with Broadcom products and supports SAP environments, ensuring well-rounded automation and operational efficiency. While technical support and vendor assistance could improve, businesses find value in its scheduling, deployment options, and workflow visibility. The industry's capability to manage cloud systems and SaaS deployment helps in mitigating disaster recovery issues and facilitates smoother ITIL process workflows.

BladeLogic Server Automation allows you to quickly and securely provision, configure, patch, and maintain physical, virtual, and cloud servers.

· Threat remediation: Combine with BMC SecOps Response Service to link vulnerabilities to identified patches and create a remediation plan

· Compliance: Integrates role-based access control, pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP, documentation, and remediation

· Provisioning: Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning

· Configuration: Consistently manage change and configuration activities across a broad range of server environments with one tool

· Reporting: Assess change impact or complete an audit using multiple dashboard views

· Patching: Supports and follows maintenance window guidelines to ensure timely delivery of patches

Sample Customers

ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB

State of Michigan, Fujitsu FSAS, Transamerica Life Insurance Company, SAP

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Redwood Software, Tidal Software by Redwood and others in Workload Automation. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.