Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Avaya Spaces vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Avaya Spaces
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
162
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Avaya Spaces is 0.7%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 11.9%, down from 18.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Karina Rivadeneira - PeerSpot reviewer
A collaborative tool with a good noise cancellation feature
We use it to conduct meetings because it is private.  The microphone's noise cancellation and static feature that record a human's voice are some of the most valuable features. The application also provides notices to everyone at the same time. You can easily use it on your phone, so it's a very…
Santhosh Varghese - PeerSpot reviewer
Whiteboard and content sharing features are good
I would rate Teams's stability as a nine out of ten. However, some recent updates have made it less stable. I find it a little bit choppy. Sometimes, I find the network quality is not very good with low bandwidth. So, sometimes, when you have low bandwidth the quality becomes very poor. So, you have to optimize your usage.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We use the solution for document sharing, video conferencing, instant messaging, and file sharing."
"The microphone's noise cancellation and static feature that record a human's voice are some of the most valuable features."
"The initial setup process is straightforward for technical executives."
"The solution has calendars that help us to manage work."
"I am impressed with the solution's collaboration with Office 365."
"The group chat is very good."
"The video conferencing is good."
"Microsoft Teams is much easier to collaborate, and its meetings are quite easy to explain things."
"Microsoft Teams is a scalable tool because it integrates with many other tools and different kinds of apps."
"What I use the most is the plugin or the optimization feature."
 

Cons

"There were some additional features coming up, as they informed us through email. But we didn't get any update on them."
"The audio calling service needs to improve its quality."
"I'd like Microsoft to start adding more AI functionality into Teams."
"The main issue is that the link goes down when there are internet issues."
"The solution is very expensive and I won't be able to afford it personally."
"Microsoft Teams withdrew the Wiki function, which was quite a good and useful feature."
"There's a feature that can send a notification to Team's channel, but I think there's no way to have it escalated on something like that."
"We face issues related to screen-sharing and stability. It is very difficult to get Microsoft's support to troubleshoot the issues. The product also needs to update its recording features."
"It's a bit slow, especially if you are downloading photos."
"The solution's customer support should be faster and more responsive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license grants you a subscription and costs about $120. I am not aware of additional costs."
"The pricing for Teams is very competitive."
"I’m unsure about the exact cost, but I believe it’s reasonable. Using Teams for collaboration, video conferencing, and messaging helps save costs, especially for communicating with third-party companies worldwide."
"The solution is priced high."
"The price is relatively high."
"Microsoft Teams is expensive compared to other solutions."
"The solution is affordable."
"The solution's pricing is average."
"We don't have to pay for the solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
70%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Avaya Spaces?
The microphone's noise cancellation and static feature that record a human's voice are some of the most valuable features.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Avaya Spaces?
The license grants you a subscription and costs about $120. I am not aware of additional costs.
What needs improvement with Avaya Spaces?
The audio calling service needs to improve its quality.
What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
I’m unsure about the exact cost, but I believe it’s reasonable. Using Teams for collaboration, video conferencing, and messaging helps save costs, especially for communicating with third-party comp...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
Everything is running smoothly, and I’m still exploring more features. As for improvements, I think it could be more user-friendly and integrate better with third-party software, like Zoom and othe...
 

Also Known As

Avaya Cloud Application Link
MS Teams
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Stop Soldier Suicide, British Columbia Ski Resort, Helse Vest, Spital Limmattal, Conduit Global
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Avaya Spaces vs. Microsoft Teams and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.