AWS Glue vs Qlik Compose comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Qlik are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

AWS Glue

Read 50 AWS Glue reviews

9,204 Views
6,903 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

2,621 Views
2,123 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

AWS Glue

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Qlik Compose based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Palantir and others in Cloud Data Integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Data Integration Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,350 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Glue

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (1st)

Qlik Compose

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (52nd)

Featured Reviews

Nivas Srinivasan

Principal Consultant at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

The solution improves ETL performance but faces challenges with version upgrades

For ETL, I feel the performance is excellent. If I create jobs in a standard way, the performance is great, and maintenance is also seamless. It is serverless, so I do not need to worry about other integrations. It runs on a serverless VM. Glue services from AWS are regularly upgraded with new properties and functions. We use PySpark and other frameworks, which help customize our ETL process in a standard way. During our process, we utilized the typical SQL ITIL process standard in Glue-oriented ETL services, which helped us improve performance and time. AWS running time, mostly during the morning, saved us time compared to the old ETL method. There are many email notifications once a job is successful or fails, and we get notifications using SES or AWS's Simple Notification Service. Glue is integrated with both email alerts, and we are responsible for managing the full data journey from end to end.

Read full review

Susheel A

Director - Metrics & Analytics at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Efficient data warehouse automation with robust features, but may require enhancements in user-friendly self-service options and pricing flexibility for broader corporate appeal

It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it. When it comes to end users who may lack technical expertise, they are limited to toggling between existing developments. To empower end users to make critical changes without relying heavily on technical expertise, it would be beneficial to introduce more user-friendly features for development and modification. If it could incorporate correlation analysis capabilities into its platform, especially in a user-friendly manner, it would greatly enhance the tool's overall utility and make it an even more outstanding solution. There is a room for improvement regarding stability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Transformations are valuable because you can modify or override complex data logic from an open source or Spark to solve issues."

"We no longer had to worry much about infrastructure management because AWS Glue is serverless, and Amazon takes care of the underlying infrastructure."

"It is a very scalable solution."

"We have found it beneficial when moving data from one source to another."

"The most valuable feature for me is the visual interface of AWS Glue."

"I also like that you can add custom libraries like JAR files and use them. So, the ability to use a fast processing engine and embed basic jobs easily are significant advantages."

"AWS Glue is quite better than other tools, but you have to learn it properly before you start using it."

"You do not need many frameworks to run Glue."

More AWS Glue pros

"It's a stable solution."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"It can scale."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

More Qlik Compose pros

Cons

"There is a learning curve to this tool."

"It would be better if it were more user-friendly. The interesting thing we found is that it was a little strange at the beginning. The way Glue works is not very straightforward. After trying different things, for example, we used just the console to create jobs. Then we realized that things were not working as expected. After researching and learning more, we realized that even though the console creates the script for the ETL processes, you need to modify or write your own script in Spark to do everything you want it to do. For example, we are pulling data from our source database and our application database, which is in Aurora. From there, we are doing the ETL to transform the data and write the results into Redshift. But what was surprising is that it's almost like whatever you want to do, you can do it with Glue because you have the option to put together your own script. Even though there are many functionalities and many connections, you have the opportunity to write your own queries to do whatever transformations you need to do. It's a little deceiving that some options are supposed to work in a certain way when you set them up in the console, but then they are not exactly working the right way or not as expected. It would be better if they provided more examples and more documentation on options."

"Overall, I consider the technical support to be fine, although the response time could be faster in certain cases."

"AWS Glue is more costly compared to other tools like Airflow."

"The point for improvement in AWS Glue would be the dynamic allocation of resources while utilizing Lambda functions."

"The monitoring is not that good."

"When comparing to tools such as Airflow, Glue workflows are still relatively basic in terms of flexibility and complex branching."

"If there's a cluster-related configuration, we have to make worker notes, which is quite a headache when processing a large amount of data."

More AWS Glue cons

"I don't think Qlik can be used in a high-volume scenario. It didn't work for us."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"There could be more customization options."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

More Qlik Compose cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is good. We pay as we go or based on the usage, which is a good thing for us because it is simple to forecast for the tool. It is good in terms of the financial planning of the company, and it is a good way to estimate the cost. It is also simple for our clients. In my opinion, it is one of the best tools in the market for ETL processes because of the fact that you pay as you use, which separates it from other big tools such as PowerCenter, Pentaho Data Integration, and Talend."

"I rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten."

"AWS Glue is a high-priced solution that bills the client $150,000 to $250,000 annually."

"I rate pricing an eight out of ten."

"AWS Glue uses a pay-as-you-go approach which is helpful. The price of the overall solution is low and is a great advantage."

"AWS Glue is a paid service that doesn't come under the free trial of AWS."

"I rate the tool an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is expensive."

"I would rate the solution a six or seven on a scale of one to ten, with ten being very expensive. Specifically, I rate its pricing a six out of ten."

More AWS Glue pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?

AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.

See all answers

How does Talend Open Studio compare with AWS Glue?

We reviewed AWS Glue before choosing Talend Open Studio. AWS Glue is the managed ETL (extract, transform, and load) from Amazon Web Services. AWS Glue enables AWS users to create and manage jobs in...

See all answers

What are the most common use cases for AWS Glue?

AWS Glue's main use case is for allowing users to discover, prepare, move, and integrate data from multiple sources. The product lets you use this data for analytics, application development, or ma...

See all answers

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs AWS Glue

Compared 42% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs AWS Glue

Compared 5% of the time

SSIS vs AWS Glue

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Data Firehose vs AWS Glue

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs AWS Glue

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Glue Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Compose

Compared 8% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Glue

August 2026

Download AWS Glue product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

August 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Also Known As

No data available

Compose, Attunity Compose

Overview

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service offering seamless integration with AWS services like S3, Redshift, and Athena. Known for its flexibility with data formats and automation of ETL tasks, AWS Glue enhances data management and transformation.

AWS Glue facilitates seamless data extraction, transformation, and loading for businesses, integrating with key AWS services, allowing efficient data pipeline automation. It's valued for a user-friendly GUI, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, supporting PySpark for complex datasets and includes a robust data catalog, real-time backup capabilities, and code generation. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in documentation, training, and broader programming language support. Users face challenges with its complex interface and integration with non-AWS products, driving demand for enhancements in its usability and performance.

What are AWS Glue's most important features?

Seamless AWS Integration: Connects effortlessly with services like S3, Redshift, and Athena.
Serverless Operation: Removes the need for infrastructure management.
Flexible Data Format Handling: Supports various data formats for comprehensive data management.
User-Friendly GUI: Simplifies the creation and management of ETL jobs.
Data Catalog: Provides an organized repository for metadata management.
Real-Time Data Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability.
Code Generation: Facilitates easy script generation for data processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduced operational costs through serverless architecture.
High Performance: Efficient data processing and transformation capabilities.
Scalability: Adapts to businesses' evolving data demands.
Ease of Use: Intuitive interface allowing streamlined ETL workflows.
Automation: Simplified data pipeline tasks saving time and effort.

Businesses leverage AWS Glue in industries for ETL processes, data integration, and transformation. It is used to optimize data lakes or warehouses integration, enhancing data cataloging and real-time integration. Its serverless feature enables efficient data processing in sectors like finance and healthcare, where handling complex data-intensive tasks is crucial.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

Sample Customers

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday

Poly-Wood

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Palantir and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.