AWS Security Hub vs IBM Watson for Cyber Security comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #13 in CSPM , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 5.6% mindshare in the category. IBM is ranked #51 in SIEM , and holds a 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

AWS Security Hub

Read 20 AWS Security Hub reviews

3,477 Views
2,914 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM Watson for Cyber Security

Read 4 IBM Watson for Cyber Security reviews

439 Views
280 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Security Hub

IBM Watson for Cyber Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

IBM Watson for Cyber Security and AWS Security Hub are robust platforms competing in the cybersecurity industry. AWS Security Hub holds the upper hand in overall cloud environment protection and cost-effectiveness according to the data comparisons.

Features: IBM Watson for Cyber Security is highly valued for its AI-driven threat detection, seamless IT ecosystem integration, and advanced threat intelligence. AWS Security Hub offers comprehensive security and compliance management within AWS environments, integrated cloud security management, and scalability.

Room for Improvement: IBM Watson users highlight its complexity of setup, need for more comprehensive documentation, and advanced configuration requirements. AWS Security Hub users desire better multi-cloud support, enhanced third-party integration capabilities, and more intuitive user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Watson's deployment can be intricate, often requiring specialized knowledge, and its customer service receives mixed reviews. AWS Security Hub offers a streamlined deployment process, backed by robust support services. Users find AWS Security Hub easier to deploy and are generally more satisfied with its support services compared to IBM Watson.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Watson's pricing is seen as premium, justified by its advanced features. AWS Security Hub users appreciate its cost-effectiveness and scalability. ROI is deemed higher for AWS Security Hub due to its integration ease and lower setup costs, making it a more appealing choice for cloud-centric security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Security Hub vs. IBM Watson for Cyber Security Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. IBM Watson for Cyber Security

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (5th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (13th)

IBM Watson for Cyber Security

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (51st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Security Hub is designed for Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and holds a mindshare of 5.6%, up 4.7% compared to last year.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security, on the other hand, focuses on Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), holds 0.2% mindshare, down 0.3% since last year.

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

CobusFrey

Product Owner Global Cloud at Tyme

Not only does it easily integrate with third-party tools but also allows auto synchronization of logs

AWS Security Hub has advanced quite a bit over the last couple of years. The features are quite rich now. Before purchasing, one should develop an understanding of the product. I believe AWS Security Hub is one of the most friendly solutions for integration with third-party tools. I find the integration of AWS Security Hub to be the easiest with tools from Microsoft and a bit difficult with Google solutions. AWS Security Hub is compliant in many different ways. The development business I am part of is SOC compliant for AWS Security Hub, while the banks our organization works with have been PCI compliant for AWS Security Hub for three years. I would definitely recommend AWS Security Hub to others, yet I would also inquire about their purpose and knowledge of cloud solutions. If you know how to use AWS Security Hub, it can be a great solution to work with. The solution is more suitable for people working in the cloud instead of on-premises. I would rate AWS Security Hub a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Elena Stefanovska

Sales Account Manager at InTec System

Knowledgeable support, reliable, and useful compliance policies

IBM Watson for Cyber Security can be deployed on-premise or in the cloud and it is used as a SIEM solution The most valuable features of IBM Watson for Cyber Security are ease of use and out-of-the-box reports and compliance policies. Additionally, if there are aspects that are missing IBM add…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I really like the seamless integration with the AWS account structure. It can even be made mandatory as part of the landing zone. These are great features. And there's a single pane of glass for the entire account."

"AWS Security Hub provides comprehensive alerts about potential compliance issues with CIS standards. The integration with third-party tools is another excellent feature. All our workloads are on AWS."

"It's a security posture management tool from AWS. Basically, it identifies misconfigurations, similar to Trusted Advisor but on a larger scale."

"AWS Security Hub has very good integration features. It allows for AWS native services integration, and it helps us to integrate some of the services outside of AWS. They have partners, such as Amazon Preferred Network Partners (APN). If you have different security tools around APN, we can integrate those findings with AWS Security Hub reducing the need to refer to different portals or different UIs. You can have AWS Security Hub act as a single common go-to dashboard."

"I find all of the features to be highly valuable."

"Finding out if your infrastructure is secure is a valuable feature."

"The most beneficial aspect of Security Hub is its proactive capability, allowing us to identify potential security issues before they escalate."

"The best feature of AWS Security Hub is that you can get compliance or your cloud's current security posture."

More AWS Security Hub pros

"IBM Watson for Cyber Security is very stable."

"The customer support is very good."

"The most valuable feature of this product is innovation, where the research and upgrading of technology never ends."

"The most valuable features of IBM Watson for Cyber Security are ease of use and out-of-the-box reports and compliance policies. Additionally, if there are aspects that are missing IBM add them in the next release."

Cons

"I would like a more fine-grained capability for creating custom rules and a more user-friendly experience programmatically in writing queries and configuring custom security rules, making it quicker and easier."

"The solution lacks self-sufficiency."

"Many findings are too generic or irrelevant to the environment, which can lead to false positives."

"Security needs to be measured based on their own criteria. We can't add custom criteria specific to our organization. For example, having an S3 bucket publicly available might be flagged as a critical alert, but it might not be critical in a sandbox environment. So, it gets flagged as critical, which becomes a false positive. So, customization options and creating custom dashboards would be areas for improvement."

"From an improvement perspective, there is a need to add more compliance since, right now, AWS Security Hub only provides four to five compliances to control the tool."

"Although AWS Security Hub does a periodic scan of your overall infrastructure, it doesn't do it in real time."

"Adding SIEM features would be beneficial because of the limited customization of AWS Security Hub."

"The solution should be easier to learn and use"

More AWS Security Hub cons

"This is an expensive product, so making it more cost-effective would be an improvement."

"In the future, I would like to see threat intelligence included."

"The dashboard could improve in IBM Watson for Cyber Security."

"They need to continue to build the AI capabilities."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Security Hub is not an expensive solution."

"There are multiple subscription models, like yearly, monthly, and packaged."

"The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions."

"AWS Security Hub is not an expensive tool. I would consider it to be a cheap solution. AWS Security Hub follows the PAYG pricing model, meaning you will have to pay for whatever you use."

"The pricing is fine. It is not an expensive tool."

"AWS Security Hub's pricing is pretty reasonable."

"The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable."

"The price of this solution should be lower, although I understand why IBM charges a premium price."

"IBM Watson for Cyber Security is very simple to license and is priced well."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user186927

Director of Operations at Bell

Feb 16, 2015

Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL

Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?

We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?

The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?

I would like a more fine-grained capability for creating custom rules and a more user-friendly experience programmatically in writing queries and configuring custom security rules, making it quicke...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 38% of the time

Wiz vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 11% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 6% of the time

Google Chronicle Suite vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS Security Hub Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs IBM Watson for Cyber Security

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Watson for Cyber Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub

December 2024

Download AWS Security Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

December 2024

Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security product report

Also Known As

SQRRL

No data available

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IBM

Overview

AWS Security Hub is a comprehensive security service that provides a centralized view of security alerts and compliance status across an AWS environment. It collects data from various AWS services, partner solutions, and AWS Marketplace products to provide a holistic view of security posture. With Security Hub, users can quickly identify and prioritize security issues, automate compliance checks, and streamline remediation efforts.

The service offers a range of features including continuous monitoring, threat intelligence integration, and customizable dashboards. It also provides automated insights and recommendations to help users improve their security posture. Security Hub integrates with other AWS services like Amazon GuardDuty, AWS Config, and AWS Macie to provide a unified security experience. Additionally, it supports integration with third-party security tools through its API, allowing users to leverage their existing security investments.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful capabilities, AWS Security Hub is a valuable tool for organizations looking to enhance their security and compliance posture in the cloud.

Watson for cyber security can draw security intelligence from millions of security blogs, online forums and white papers - so you can see threats unseen by other systems.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. IBM Watson for Cyber Security

October 2024

Free Report: AWS Security Hub vs. IBM Watson for Cyber Security

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. IBM Watson for Cyber Security and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Security Hub vs. IBM Watson for Cyber Security report.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.