Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Security Hub vs Snare comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
AWS Security Hub support is praised for its prompt technical assistance but could improve email response efficiency.
No sentiment score available
Snare's customer service is praised for quick responses and knowledgeable staff, with only occasional delays in support response times.
AWS ProLogitech Support is very helpful and timely, especially at the enterprise level.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.5
AWS Security Hub needs real-time scanning improvements, better integrations, enhanced compliance, cost control, and user-friendly features.
Sentiment score
3.8
Snare requires better reporting, alerting, performance, technical support response times, and improved documentation for easier configuration and troubleshooting.
A more user-friendly experience programmatically in writing queries and configuring custom security rules.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
AWS Security Hub is scalable and efficient for multi-account operations but less effective in multi-cloud environments.
Sentiment score
9.3
Snare is praised for its scalability, efficient data handling, smooth integration, and suitability for both small and large businesses.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.0
AWS Security Hub offers flexible, cost-effective subscription models, appealing to enterprises for its affordability and included cloud security features.
No sentiment score available
Snare provides scalable, flexible pricing based on deployment size, features, and support, with discounts for multi-year commitments.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
AWS Security Hub is highly regarded for its stability, frequent updates, and reliable performance, though improvement is suggested by some.
Sentiment score
8.5
Snare is reliable, efficiently processes logs, handles high loads, and has minor bugs quickly fixed by support.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.6
AWS Security Hub enhances cloud security by integrating services, offering centralized management, real-time alerts, and compliance evaluations.
Sentiment score
7.8
Snare offers customizable log management, scalable architecture, real-time monitoring, robust security, system integration, and detailed reporting capabilities.
The most beneficial aspect of Security Hub is its proactive capability, allowing us to identify potential security issues before they escalate.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (5th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (14th)
Snare
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (44th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (43rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Security Hub is designed for Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and holds a mindshare of 5.8%, up 4.2% compared to last year.
Snare, on the other hand, focuses on Log Management, holds 0.3% mindshare, down 0.4% since last year.
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

CobusFrey - PeerSpot reviewer
Not only does it easily integrate with third-party tools but also allows auto synchronization of logs
AWS Security Hub has advanced quite a bit over the last couple of years. The features are quite rich now. Before purchasing, one should develop an understanding of the product. I believe AWS Security Hub is one of the most friendly solutions for integration with third-party tools. I find the integration of AWS Security Hub to be the easiest with tools from Microsoft and a bit difficult with Google solutions. AWS Security Hub is compliant in many different ways. The development business I am part of is SOC compliant for AWS Security Hub, while the banks our organization works with have been PCI compliant for AWS Security Hub for three years. I would definitely recommend AWS Security Hub to others, yet I would also inquire about their purpose and knowledge of cloud solutions. If you know how to use AWS Security Hub, it can be a great solution to work with. The solution is more suitable for people working in the cloud instead of on-premises. I would rate AWS Security Hub a nine out of ten.
Frank Eargle - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly scalable solution that is easy to manage and super easy to set up
We use Snare for picking up Windows logs, and we used to use it for SQL as well. We had used it for Linux once or twice. We're mainly using it for Windows and Windows flat files The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user186927 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 16, 2015
Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL
Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?
We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...
What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?
The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.
What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?
AWS Security Hub could improve its guidance links to resolve findings related to multiple resources. The implementation of more guidance links could enhance issue resolution. Additionally, shorteni...
What do you like most about Snare?
The best thing about Snare is its format and consistency.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snare?
Snare is a cheap solution because a lot of customers are using it.
What needs improvement with Snare?
Users will initially find it difficult to identify the event types and installation in Snare.
 

Also Known As

SQRRL
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com
Military, Defence and Security Agencies, Banking Finance and Insurance companies, Retail, Health and Utilities.
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. Snare and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.