Azure Stack vs High Performance Computing (HPC) comparison

Microsoft and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #13. Microsoft holds a 17.4% mindshare in HCCP, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Azure Stack

Read 69 Azure Stack reviews

3,524 Views
3,418 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

High Performance Computing ...

Read 2 High Performance Computing (HPC) reviews

472 Views
472 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Stack

High Performance Computing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Azure Stack and High Performance Computing (HPC) compete in the cloud and computational power sector. Azure Stack seems to have the upper hand in offering hybrid cloud advantages with data control, while HPC delivers unmatched computational power for intense applications.

Features: Azure Stack offers hybrid cloud capabilities, seamless integration with Azure services, and a consistent development experience across environments. HPC provides exceptional processing power, high-speed data handling, and scalability for demanding computational workloads.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Stack allows straightforward deployment through a consistent environment across cloud and local data centers, simplifying management and integration with Azure. It features robust support through Microsoft. HPC involves complex deployment tailored for high-demand needs, requiring specialized support focused on performance optimization.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Stack typically incurs lower initial setup costs due to its integration with existing infrastructure, enabling quicker ROI from hybrid cloud benefits. HPC may require higher setup investment for specialized hardware and software but potentially delivers higher ROI by efficiently managing complex computations and large-scale simulations.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Stack vs. High Performance Computing (HPC) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Stack vs. High Performance Computing (HPC)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,515 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Stack

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) (2nd)

High Performance Computing ...

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category, the mindshare of Azure Stack is 17.4%, down from 29.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of High Performance Computing (HPC) is 3.2%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Stack	17.4%
High Performance Computing (HPC)	3.2%
Other	79.4%

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

Featured Reviews

Rajendra-Satale

Data Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Unified data platform has improved regulatory compliance but still needs better integration features

It is difficult to say about Azure Stack improvement because I need to revisit and study it again. The pricing is okay, but on the services side, perhaps we need to think about some services, not all. I would not like to see any additional features in the future. To give them more like a 9 out of 10 or 10 out of 10, I think they need to improve on the interface, implementation, configuration, and integration with other products, so I rate them an eight. As compared to AWS, they need to add more features. I would like to see operations and storage features, like AI features or security features.

Read full review

Manuel Ayala

Global Datacenter Infrastructure and HPC Director at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Helps to run simulations and create prototypes which reduces the costs

HPC's neutral configuration is not difficult. The tool's deployment depends on your understanding of its architecture and use cases. I rate it a three out of five. A regular cluster will take two weeks to set up. OEMs helped us with the physical hardware installation. Once the cluster was running, our team configured the software and networks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing about this product is that it is user-friendly and intuitive."

"The initial setup is very, very simple."

"The whole package works very well together for identity management, defending endpoints or servers, and the CM."

"I find Cloud App Security and activity alerts particularly valuable."

"The solution is cheap and helps consolidate infrastructure to a converged space compatible with medium customers."

"The admin dashboard is the main feature of the solution."

"You can scale the solution if you need to."

"The solution is certainly stable."

More Azure Stack pros

"Our customers can publish scientific reports in prestigious magazines. HPC offers strong computing capabilities."

"HPC speeds up delivery time and reduces costs. It comes with the capability and flexibility to understand how engineering products work. You can understand the outcome without spending time and money."

Cons

"The user experience could be improved to make it more comfortable."

"Azure Messaging services are in need of improvement."

"The licensing model of Azure Stack is complicated."

"I think the monitoring tools needs some improvement."

"We face some challenges with database rebuilding."

"I would like to see the AI side come to one hundred percent in the near future."

"Azure Stack's pricing could be improved."

"It does not give you a complete, production-ready setup."

More Azure Stack cons

"The solution is expensive."

"There was a buzz around the integration of quantum computing and HPC. However, I don't see a real-life use case for it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, my customers believe AWS is slightly more reasonably priced than Azure."

"Azure Stack's price falls on the higher side of the spectrum. The licensing costs for Azure Stack in our region range somewhere between 40,000 to 50,000 USD."

"The premium version is too costly."

"Azure is reasonably priced compared to Google Cloud, AWS, or some other cloud giants."

"The solution saves us money but is more costly than other products such as AWS."

"Subscription model customers need not make large expenditures on upfront purchasing."

"The licensing costs are expensive."

"We are satisfied with the pricing."

More Azure Stack pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

University

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	26

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Stack?

For hybrid cloud operations, the seamless transition it enables is key. Most enterprises have a lot of workloads on-premises, and they want a smooth way to move into the cloud. Some things are on...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Stack?

Maintenance is included as part of the overall cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Stack?

I am not really aware about Azure Stack's integration capabilities with my existing IT investments; my technical team would know more about it.I think Azure Stack is a bit expensive, but it is defi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Cloud Foundation vs Azure Stack

Compared 48% of the time

AWS Outposts vs Azure Stack

Compared 21% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs Azure Stack

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Azure Stack

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure VMware vs Azure Stack

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Stack Competitors

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs High Performance Computing (HPC)

Compared 33% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs High Performance Computing (HPC)

Compared 31% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs High Performance Computing (HPC)

Compared 22% of the time

AWS Outposts vs High Performance Computing (HPC)

Compared 14% of the time

More High Performance Computing (HPC) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Stack

January 2026

Download Azure Stack product report

Buyer's Guide

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

January 2026

Download High Performance Computing (HPC) product report

Overview

Information not available

Microsoft

High Performance Computing (HPC) enables efficient processing of large datasets and complex computations, driving advancements in a range of fields and supporting cutting-edge research.

HPC is integral for industries that require substantial computational power. Its ability to handle extensive calculations quickly facilitates advancements in scientific and engineering domains. The scalability and flexibility of HPC systems allow for tailored solutions that address specific computational challenges such as simulations and data analysis. As demand for processing power grows, HPC's architecture evolves to improve efficiency, speed, and accessibility. Users benefit from constant innovations that optimize system performance and energy usage, making HPC an adaptable and reliable choice for resource-intensive tasks.

What are the most important features of High Performance Computing (HPC)?

Scalability: Adjust resources to accommodate varying workloads.
Performance: Rapid processing of large datasets and complex computations due to multi-node configurations.
Flexibility: Customize configurations to suit specific computational tasks and projects.

What benefits and ROI should you look for?

Cost Efficiency: Reduced time to market through accelerated computations.
Enhanced Capabilities: Access to state-of-the-art processing power expands research potential.
Resource Optimization: Balance workload distribution for efficient resource usage.

Industries such as healthcare, finance, and weather forecasting implement HPC to manage data-intensive tasks. In healthcare, HPC supports genomic research by processing vast data swiftly. Financial services utilize it for risk analysis and real-time trading, while meteorology relies on its computational power for accurate weather predictions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Weblink, Fathym, Sage, CFD Support Ltd, The UberCloud Inc.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Azure Stack vs. High Performance Computing (HPC)

December 2025

Free Report: Azure Stack vs. High Performance Computing (HPC)

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Stack vs. High Performance Computing (HPC) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Stack vs. High Performance Computing (HPC) report.

See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.