


Link11 and Azure Web Application Firewall compete in the web application security market. Azure may have the upper hand because of its robust integration with Microsoft's ecosystem and advanced threat protection capabilities.
Features: Link11 offers a user-friendly dashboard, real-time monitoring, and customization support, which are critical for managing security in cloud architecture and DDoS protection. Azure stands out with its seamless integration with Microsoft's suite, advanced threat protection, and ability to filter requests using custom rules and OWASP standards, suitable for users invested in Microsoft services.
Room for Improvement: Link11 could improve change management procedures and reporting alerts, as well as enhance session management and reporting capabilities. Azure could benefit from better documentation, simplified deployment processes, more intuitive cloud security management support, and clearer cross-platform deployment guidance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Link11 is praised for providing responsive assistance and expert interactions, though it lacks 24/7 availability. Its services are easy to deploy across various cloud configurations, including hybrid and public clouds. Azure Web Application Firewall also offers robust customer service, with high integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, making deployment seamless for Microsoft users.
Pricing and ROI: Link11 has flexible pricing models offering predictable costs and substantial long-term user discounts. Azure Web Application Firewall provides competitive pricing under enterprise agreements and is recognized for cost-effectiveness, despite higher costs for additional features. Both offer a good return on investment, with Link11 delivering value through comprehensive coverage and Azure aligning pricing with the integrated suite of Microsoft services.
My experience with the pricing or licensing of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is that many features can be accessed for free, so the pricing is definitely reasonable.
AI-based recommendations save on time and money.
Recently, they have been under serious attack with major exploits, such as Log4j, affecting Fortinet and Palo Alto, and even Cisco and VMware.
I would rate the technical support with Cloudflare as excellent every time I've had to contact them.
The technical support of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall rates between five and seven at maximum.
I hardly use Microsoft's paid subscription or maintenance services, however, whenever I send them a note, they have been responsive.
I would rate the technical support that Azure provides from Microsoft a seven.
I reached out to their support, and they helped me resolve the issue effectively.
The scalability of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall rates between 8 to 9, as it depends upon the use cases and what exactly the client needs.
Beyond a certain SKU, I can install and use these services.
For our company, Azure Web Application Firewall works effectively for scalability.
The stability of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall deserves a perfect 10 out of 10.
Very rarely do I see any latency issues.
Cloudflare will check the order of the message, and if you, as a customer, are not connected or have some kind of network issue, when you reconnect, you will receive the latest state and missing updates.
The product can improve by having more multitenancy capability, which is currently not available.
I think they're doing a good job with DNS and as support for any domains that I create or that my clients create, it's mandatory for me to ensure they have Cloudflare as their DNS provider.
Upgrading the platform regularly is necessary for security, however, frequent updates every six months or year from Azure can be a maintenance overhead.
The pricing needs improvement, and I think for beginners it will be a little bit complicated, so the ease of use could be enhanced.
It is even a lower cost compared to AWS and GCP.
Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements.
I would place Azure Web Application Firewall at an eight on a scale from one to 10, with one being cheap and 10 being expensive.
The custom rules and the geo-redundant geographical rule feature, which allows me to implement geographical rules for customers, add significant value.
All the DNS and everything is routed through Cloudflare, so anybody coming to any of the sites has to go through Cloudflare first, making them the first wall of defense.
We are in the gambling business, in the betting business, so we have constant daily DDoS attacks, and it's always working fine.
With Microsoft, everything is within a single suite, making it easier to configure and plan.
It integrates effectively with things such as Sentinel and Defender for Cloud, so mostly it's the analytics and now the AI capabilities that have been introduced with Co-pilot.
It is almost impossible to access these assets from outside, requiring a very skilled attacker to obtain asset tokens of a customer using Azure.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cloudflare Web Application Firewall | 5.4% |
| Azure Web Application Firewall | 2.8% |
| Link11 | 1.1% |
| Other | 90.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.
Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) provides centralized protection of your web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities. Web applications are increasingly targeted by malicious attacks that exploit commonly known vulnerabilities. SQL injection and cross-site scripting are among the most common attacks.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
Link11, headquartered in Germany, offers cloud-based IT security services designed to prevent business disruptions, enhancing cyber resilience for IT networks and critical applications globally. Their services benefit industries across Europe, North America, and Asia with comprehensive protection.
Link11 provides a range of security and performance solutions, including Network Security, Web Application & API Protection, and Application Performance solutions. Their offerings encompass Network DDoS protection and an all-in-one WAAP solution, featuring Web Application Firewall, Web DDoS Protection, Bot Management, API Protection, and Secure CDN & DNS. A high-performance global network, monitored 24/7 by the Link11 Security Operations Center, ensures robust defense mechanisms.
What are the key features of Link11?Link11 is suited for industries wanting to protect web applications against Layer 7 DDoS attacks, cross-site scripting, SQL injection, and phishing attempts. Deployed on cloud models, Link11 integrates as a fundamental security layer, offering effective bot management and securing websites with multiple technologies.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.