Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Better Stack vs Grafana Loki comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Better Stack
Ranking in Log Management
56th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Grafana Loki
Ranking in Log Management
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use Better Stack?
Share your opinion
Arjun Pandey - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 25, 2023
Effective for Logging, recovery from node failures is fast and single UI supports metrics, logs, and even tracing
If it is HelloGuard setup or doing some setup on the dev cluster, it's pretty straightforward. But when we're dealing with a heavy cluster, like 15 to 20 terabytes of data per day, we need a production-grade cluster. For that kind of scenario, we must invest time and understand the process. We could have integrated these features within their health check, but they're using processes like Tanka and Jsonnet to implement a production service. I feel this could have been better. If I use a metric solution for metrics, I'd use Grafana for metrics monitoring. For logging, I'd use a different tool, like ELK. And for tracing another tool. So, to troubleshoot a specific issue, I have to switch between three different consoles. What I see in metrics isn't the same as in logs because the metadata and collection methods differ. That's where Loki comes in. Within Grafana, you can see metrics, logs, correlations, generate metrics from logs, and also set alerts. Alerting from logs is something many companies desire. With Loki, if there's a pattern in the log, we can filter it out without altering the entire pipeline. For instance, if I had to add fields in ELK, it would require a lot of configuration changes. Loki, however, is more flexible. It uses a grep-like pattern and the metadata model from Prometheus. It's highly efficient, with compressed data and block storage like GCS bucket or AWS S3, making log storage cost-effective. Compared to other solutions, it's more economical. Loki also has a Log CLI, which is very effective. It's all on-premises. Like, it's on the cloud, but it's self-managed, not a managed service.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I use the open-source version of the product."
"The pricing structure varies based on the number of users; there might be specific taxes to pay for it."
"We use a free version."
"Grafana Loki is an open-source solution."
"You can use the free version of Grafana Loki on-premises."
"The cost is less than other paid services like CloudWatch."
"Since we are using the open-source version of Grafana Loki, we are not paying anything for the solution."
"I use the solution's open-source version. Grafana Loki is a completely free solution for me."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Grafana Loki?
We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana Loki?
I use open source Grafana. Many companies are interested in open-source solutions that are less costly. So I usually use open source Grafana.
What needs improvement with Grafana Loki?
There is room for improvement in the stability. Challenges arise because these open-source tools are mostly intended for Kubernetes and Docker. However, my client uses ECS, and some of the guys on ...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian 2. Buffer 3. Cisco 4. Databricks 5. DigitalOcean 6. Dropbox 7. eBay 8. Facebook 9. Google 10. HubSpot 11. IBM 12. LinkedIn 13. Lyft 14. Microsoft 15. Netflix 16. Pinterest 17. Qualcomm 18. Salesforce 19. Spotify 20. Square 21. Stripe 22. Twitter 23. Uber 24. VMware 25. WeWork 26. Workday 27. Yelp
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: November 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.