Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

Bizagi and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bizagi is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4, while OpenText is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.7. Bizagi holds a 6.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Bizagi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Bizagi

Read 80 Bizagi reviews

4,744 Views
4,204 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 14 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

550 Views
379 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bizagi

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and Bizagi are solutions designed to improve business processes and document management. OpenText 360 for SharePoint appears to have an advantage in shared environments due to its seamless integration with SharePoint, whereas Bizagi leads in workflow automation with its advanced process automation features.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers seamless integration with SharePoint, efficient document management, and collaboration within Microsoft environments. It provides extensive compliance features along with straightforward metadata management. Bizagi is recognized for its advanced process modeling and automation capabilities, offering a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface for workflow design. It also supports business process automation beyond document management, providing a versatile platform.

Room for Improvement: OpenText 360 for SharePoint can improve in simplifying its integration layer and reducing dependency on existing infrastructure. Enhanced user interface elements could provide a more intuitive experience. Additionally, expanding its support for platforms beyond Microsoft could increase versatility. Bizagi can enhance its integration capabilities and improve error identification in this feature. Its orchestration capabilities have room for enhancement, along with refining training tools and documentation for a smoother user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint requires layered deployment within SharePoint systems, often needing professional support for optimization. Bizagi provides adaptable deployment options, on-premises or cloud-based, accompanied by responsive customer service that facilitates smoother onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint typically involves a higher upfront investment due to its integration requirements and specialized features for SharePoint users. ROI is achieved through enhanced document efficiency and compliance. Bizagi offers competitive pricing, lower initial setup costs, and focuses on providing rapid ROI through improved process efficiencies and reduced operational bottlenecks.

To learn more, read our detailed Bizagi vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (6th), Process Automation (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (15th), Low-Code Development Platforms (11th), No-Code Development Platforms (4th), Process Mining (5th)

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 6.6%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.4%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

Enables budget review efficiency with open source advantages and workflow orchestration

Definitely, right now, it is purely open source, and we don't have much community support. If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good. Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased. Otherwise, people cannot onboard that particular technology easily.

Read full review

Ravi Krishnan S

Head - Financial Reporting and Taxation at TVS Capital Funds

Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive

OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It improves visibility and quality, and basically, it avoids human errors."

"The main feature of Bizagi is the speed to which we can automate processes and how we can modify them without a strong impact on the end users."

"The product has a comfortable GUI and a good environment for users."

"It is open source."

"I like the integration part, and I also like how they use the database, such as the data when they implement all the data side, and how you can easily integrate it with their widgets."

"The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products."

"The most valuable feature is the simulation."

"Very, very stable."

More Bizagi pros

"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."

"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."

"Overall, I would rate OpenText 360 for SharePoint as ten."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

Cons

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"One of the features which could be improved is machine learning. Even though this product has been working on this topic, we can see that it still requires improvement."

"Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi."

"The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."

"Bizagi doesn't have integrations with other solutions, such as ERP systems. In the industry and your company, you have a lot of systems with which you need to integrate, but Bizagi doesn't have such integrations, which makes it very difficult. Its scalability can also be improved. It is good for a startup, but when you need something more complex, it is not good."

"The gateway through which it connects with other vendors, specifically RPA vendors, is one aspect that could be improved."

"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."

"The open source version lacks the option to publish."

More Bizagi cons

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."

"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."

"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"It has a very high price. Many clients complain about the price for maintaining the application on Bizagi."

"The product must improve its cost."

"I'm trying the free unlimited version with unlimited use. But you have to pay to add some features."

"The price could be lower."

"The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."

"We have no issues with the pricing."

"I was using the free version."

More Bizagi pricing and cost advice

"On-premises version is expensive"

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"It has a reasonable price."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Government

13%

Legal Firm

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?

I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bizagi?

The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?

My company uses the free version of the product. In our company, we are doing documentation and modeling. When we reach that point of automating the processes, then maybe we shall acquire the paid ...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

In terms of pricing, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is more expensive than Microsoft. On a scale of one to ten, I rate its price as six.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes. Specifically, integration with a feature like Planner could assist in assigning tasks to speci...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bizagi

Compared 26% of the time

Visio vs Bizagi

Compared 18% of the time

Lucidchart vs Bizagi

Compared 6% of the time

Bonita vs Bizagi

Compared 6% of the time

Appian vs Bizagi

Compared 5% of the time

More Bizagi Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi

March 2025

Download Bizagi product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

March 2025

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Also Known As

No data available

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Overview

Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

Bizagi

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

March 2025

Free Report: Bizagi vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bizagi vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.