BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

BlackBerry and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3, while WatchGuard is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8. BlackBerry holds a 1.2% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

2,960 Views
2,664 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

WatchGuard EPDR

Read 37 WatchGuard EPDR reviews

5,078 Views
3,809 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

WatchGuard EPDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and WatchGuard EPDR are prominent players in the cybersecurity space, specifically in endpoint protection solutions. BlackBerry Cylance seems to have the edge in advanced AI-driven threat detection, while WatchGuard EPDR excels in ease of use and flexible deployment options.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance offers AI and machine learning-based virus protection without reliance on signature-based methods, providing robust zero-day threat protection. It is lightweight with minimal system impact and includes a centralized dashboard for easy management. WatchGuard EPDR provides comprehensive endpoint protection with strong patch management, application control, and website control. Users appreciate its reliability and ease of use.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance could improve its user interface and reporting features, address false positives, enhance integration options, and offer better training resources. Users seek improved technical support response times. WatchGuard EPDR could benefit from enhanced DNS security features, better management of false positives, and more comprehensive integration options, alongside improved visualization of data control features and remote monitoring enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance allows deployment in public cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments but experiences with technical support vary. Users report mixed experiences with customer support responsiveness and expertise. WatchGuard EPDR emphasizes public cloud deployment, with customer service rated highly for effectiveness and technical support, especially through managed service providers.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance is seen as slightly expensive compared to competitors but offers solid ROI by reducing security breach incidents. Pricing is subscription-based, varying per endpoint. WatchGuard EPDR's pricing is considered competitive, with options for different packages and add-ons. It offers favorable ROI due to an improvement in security measures, reducing time dedicated to vulnerability management.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,899 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WatchGuard EPDR

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WatchGuard EPDR	2.1%
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity	1.2%
Other	96.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Norlia Jalani

Section Head, Information Technology at a transportation company with 201-500 employees

Using cloud-based console for software inventory management and email alerts

I have no idea if I use some automation functions. I can't find any disadvantages; maybe that is because many companies haven't used it. I would prefer to see some features such as AI in antivirus solutions. I appreciate reporting, but it could be better with monthly reporting or auto-generated monthly reports.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the AI and mathematical components that they use."

"The solution is pretty easy to scale."

"Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product."

"The CylancePROTECT agent is very low on CPU usage, so it has virtually no adverse impact on my servers, desktops, or workstations."

"CylancePROTECT is very stable - we've had no issues with performance and no errors or bugs."

"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."

"One of the best features of the solution is that it's easy to deploy."

"I rate the tool a ten out of ten when it comes to the ease of use or management part."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

"Their remote management (RMM) is very good."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its device control."

"The most valuable features of Panda Security Adaptive Defense are the useful hardware information it provides, light on resources, controllable from the console, remote scan functionality, and the blocking of a lot of URL malware."

"I can put tons of load on it."

"The most valuable feature is the web filter application control."

"WatchGuard EPDR improves organization primarily by supporting the IT team rather than the end users directly. It helps IT teams accomplish more with fewer people. One of its standout features is the patch management solution, which allows companies without up-to-date services like WSUS to manage patches for Windows and Linux systems. Additionally, it provides the usual endpoint protection features such as virus and malware protection, application control, and website control."

"We have control over our devices, specifically USB ports, allowing us to block or control the traffic."

More WatchGuard EPDR pros

Cons

"The AI of CylancePROTECT has room for improvement. I'm on a trial license of SentinelOne, and its AI is much better than what's on CylancePROTECT."

"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."

"It was not effective. There were a lot of false positives, even when we use Adobe, and everybody uses Adobe, which is not a threat."

"An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly."

"The solution should implement AI in the product."

"Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's rollback functionality. With this feature, if you get infected, with a click, you can go back to the pre-infection state. If Cylance could add this functionality to their offering as well, that would be ideal."

"The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement."

"If they can add more features on top of their Persona feature that would be ideal."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"Improvements could be made in terms of how the reporting is structured."

"The stability could be improved. My teammates who use Panda Security and I have experienced some issues."

"The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor."

"It needs improvements in its EDR and its ability to manage all the nodes. I'd like better communication between the console and the nodes, so I don't have to remote into each individual machine that's having an issue with the protection."

"Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense’s stability could be improved."

"The solution should have additional endpoint protection."

"The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive."

More WatchGuard EPDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is around the same as most EDRs but slightly behind some of the major ones."

"The tool is not that expensive."

"We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years."

"The product cost is about $5, per user, per month."

"Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc."

"CylancePROTECT is worth the money, but I'm not sure of its exact price. I can't remember off the top of my head."

"The licensing part of the product is too expensive compared to other solutions in the market."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"The price is excellent."

"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"The product is available at a high price."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

"The solution's pricing is better compared to other products."

More WatchGuard EPDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Hospitality Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

The price of the solution is okay. It's all right.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I would not be able to say what areas of WatchGuard EPDR have improved, as I do not work with the product myself so much anymore. I just used to assist with installation and deployment, especially ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 4% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

January 2026

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

December 2025

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity leverages AI and machine learning for efficient malware detection and zero-day threat protection, offering robust endpoint security with high detection accuracy and low false positive rates.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity delivers advanced threat protection with AI-driven algorithms and machine learning. Its lightweight design ensures low system resource usage, making it both efficient and effective. It's recognized for centralized management, easy deployment, and a clean interface, providing comprehensive endpoint protection against diverse threats. The integration of features like CylanceOPTICS and behavioral monitoring enhances security insights. While the system excels in malware detection, enhancements are needed in areas like user interface design, reporting, deeper threat analysis, and integration with third-party systems. Support and pricing improvements could also increase competitiveness.

What are the key features of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

AI and Machine Learning: Utilizes cutting-edge technology for malware and threat detection.
Zero-Day Protection: Safeguards against emerging threats without the need for constant updates.
Centralized Management: Simplifies deployment and management across devices.
CylanceOPTICS: Provides advanced security insights and behavioral monitoring.
Low Resource Usage: Ensures efficient operation with minimal system impact.

What benefits should users expect from BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

High Detection Accuracy: Reduces risk with minimal false positives.
Efficient Resource Management: Enhances performance with its lightweight design.
Proactive Threat Defense: Protects against a wide range of threats with centralized management.
Advanced Insights: Offers unique features for detailed security analysis.

Organizations deploy BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity for threat analytics, log management, and endpoint protection. As an antivirus replacement, it protects against zero-day malware, ransomware, and various threats. Its AI algorithms detect anomalies, minimizing risks in both internet-connected and isolated environments. Many businesses incorporate it into wider security strategies, appreciating its centralized management and proactive defense capabilities.

BlackBerry

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR

December 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.