BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Trend Micro ServerProtect comparison

BlackBerry and Trend Micro are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.4, while Trend Micro is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.0. BlackBerry holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trend Micro’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

3,417 Views
2,603 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Trend Micro ServerProtect

Read 14 Trend Micro ServerProtect reviews

2,474 Views
1,441 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Trend Micro ServerProtect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and Trend Micro ServerProtect compete in the cybersecurity market. BlackBerry Cylance has the upper hand in AI-driven threat detection and light system impact, while Trend Micro ServerProtect is more valued for cloud management and robust integration capabilities.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance offers AI-driven threat detection, lightweight operations with minimal system impact, and features like CylanceOPTICS for comprehensive endpoint protection. Trend Micro ServerProtect provides virtual patching, centralized cloud management, and protection that covers virtual machines without installing agents on each node.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance needs enhancements in its user interface, reduction in false positives, and improvements in its alerting system. Trend Micro ServerProtect could benefit from better platform integration, expanded EDR visibility, and improvements in management for complex setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance offers flexible deployment options across public and private clouds but faces inconsistent technical support experiences. Trend Micro ServerProtect provides hybrid deployment flexibility and receives higher praise for its consistent support quality and ease of setup.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance is perceived as more expensive compared to competitors like Kaspersky, while Trend Micro ServerProtect offers a flexible pricing model, scalable according to needs. BlackBerry provides cost-effectiveness in endpoint protection, and Trend Micro's variable pricing allows customization with both solutions offering strong ROI through enhanced security and reduced labor costs.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trend Micro ServerProtect

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Micro ServerProtect is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Syed Azimuddin

Senior Specialist - Security Solutions at Mannai

Realtime intelligent end-to-end detection and protection from malware in a highly versatile product

From a technical perspective, I think ServerProtect is one of the best security products on the market. It is a mature product that already has most features that any product of this type has. What can be improved is that the cost is very high. So I feel that the cost should be reduced, even if it is justified. One thing that I would like to see as an additional feature is just a custom sandbox within the solution itself. So instead of having to go and use an additional sandbox for testing, you could have a custom sandbox integrated directly into the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Has good RAM capacity for the power I need"

"It secures different entry points into the network."

"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."

"The solution is extremely scalable. It's got the hybrid functionality, it's got the system functionality and cloud functionality as well."

"The most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT is the support."

"It does a good job of protecting us."

"The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features."

"The non-daily requirement to update signatures is the most valuable feature. From a functional point of view, it is pretty spot on. For instance, we compared an algorithm from five years ago to today's algorithm, and it was 98% accurate. It has the ability to detect and mitigate. In the industrial environment that we work in, there's what we call OT versus IT. You are IT Central, but this is OT. Generally, we don't have the same level of skillset as IT individuals or IT professionals have. This particular product doesn't require you to be a computer scientist to be able to understand its proprietary algorithm and to be able to deploy, use, and work within it. It integrates well with a robust SIEM or SOAR solution, and it plays nice with others. We use other detection solutions like CyberX or site provision with Cisco, and it plays nice. That's one of the things we really liked about it."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"Virtual Batching and the intelligent anti-malware components are valuable security tools."

"Able to quarantine any malware."

"Allows us to protect OneDrive and SharePoint, and emails too."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"Performance is very good."

"ServerProtect's best feature is virtual patching, which takes care of patching even if your servers aren't updated with the latest threat definitions."

"The most valuable features are the anti-malware and antivirus capabilities."

"Scalable security solution with virtualization and virtual patching functions, able to provide full security that's specific to the service, e.g. it handles virtual machines better."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect pros

Cons

"The management console needs a little maturity in how it presents data and allows the administrator to drill down or search across systems."

"The AI of CylancePROTECT has room for improvement. I'm on a trial license of SentinelOne, and its AI is much better than what's on CylancePROTECT."

"The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly."

"The solution’s user interface could be improved."

"The price for this EPP platform is expensive and could be improved."

"It could have integration with industrial base HMIS or Human Machine Interfaces Solutions. This is the industrial environment where you have a control center for all the automation that's happening, whether it is oil, gas, or chemical manufacturing. They often have to set up a computer at the back and watch the other stuff to get alerts. In these autonomous or on-premises environments, they often don't have access to email readily. Integration with other industrial solutions, such as HMIS, will allow them to communicate and get an alert that something has been found. This way, they can react to it sooner than having somebody watch the screen and keep checking the screen. Rockwell has its own suite. Similarly, Honeywell has its own suite. There's also an independent HMI/historian solution provider out there called VTSCADA. We actually get asked if we can get it to show up on a screen, which is difficult. Getting those alerts to work within an industrial environment would be a huge plus."

"They could improve on the false positives, reporting and whitelisting features."

"The solution should implement AI in the product."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"The cost is very high and it should be lower to be more competitive."

"Trend Micro is a little bit complicated when it comes to setting up special policies."

"There are a few areas of improvement. Despite its high performance, there are certain aspects related to the operating system that could be improved. Specifically, I find that the protection for certain actions requires more effort compared to other actions."

"The solution should provide features to block devices, specific IPs or URLs"

"Could include additional features such as an intrusion prevention system."

"Integration with different platforms could be an area for improvement in Trend Micro ServerProtect, e.g. it needs more integration. It could also be more secure and more stable. In the next release, this solution should also include more EDR visibility."

"One thing I have been facing is that some fake threats have appeared that even Trend Micro was not able to clear up. It couldn't tell you why these threats are happening, where they are coming from and what the costs are."

"The endpoint protection could always be stronger."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years."

"Shop around for sure and be assured the price you pay will be close to other solutions available, but even at a slight mark-up from the other solutions, you are getting real endpoint protection versus nothing more than a cheap security blanket that might keep you warm at night."

"The licensing part of the product is too expensive compared to other solutions in the market."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"Currently, we have competitive pricing for Cylance, which is affordable enough to consider."

"The license price for this solution could be better. It's on the expensive side."

"Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc."

"The tool is not that expensive."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"The product is available at a reasonable price"

"Pricewise, this product is okay."

"This product has an annual subscription, but also offers MSP options."

"Pricing is based on the components you choose from the suite to run in your installation. Costs vary by the number of features and the number of servers."

"In terms of price, the solution is in the middle; it's neither the cheapest nor the most expensive. I rate it three out of five for cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

See all answers

What do you like most about Trend Micro ServerProtect?

The initial setup is very straightforward.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro ServerProtect?

The product is available at a reasonable price. The product can probably be purchased for INR 800 per year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Trend Micro ServerProtect?

The solution should provide features to block devices, specific IPs or URLs.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 21% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 5% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 24% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 20% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 18% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 13% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 9% of the time

More Trend Micro ServerProtect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

April 2025

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

Trend Micro ServerProtect

March 2025

Download Trend Micro ServerProtect product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, ServerProtect, ServerProtect for Storage

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance provides endpoint security, threat protection, and antivirus capabilities, using AI and machine learning for protection against malware and ransomware on desktops, servers, and virtual machines worldwide. Its AI-driven threat detection operates even with limited internet, facilitating effective threat management.

BlackBerry Cylance's centralized dashboard simplifies threat management and vulnerability protection for organizations globally. The platform combines AI and machine learning to deliver superior zero-day threat protection and minimize CPU usage, offering stable and accurate threat detection without frequent updates. It includes tools like CylanceOPTICS and CylancePERSONA for enhanced user behavior monitoring and adopts a proactive approach that effectively manages threats at various lifecycle stages. Renowned for stability and performance, it efficiently prevents unauthorized applications while maintaining system productivity.

What are the main features of BlackBerry Cylance?

Minimal CPU Usage: Efficiently operates without taxing computer resources.
AI and Machine Learning: Advanced technology for zero-day threat protection.
Lightweight Design: Functions without constant updates for simplified usage.
Centralized Management: Offers a user-friendly, intuitive dashboard.
CylanceOPTICS and PERSONA: Tools for in-depth user behavior analysis.

What are key benefits to look for in user reviews?

Effective Malware Detection: Recognized accuracy in identifying security threats.
Proactive Threat Mitigation: Actively detects and manages threats.
Stability and Performance: Consistent protection without hampering system performance.
Reduced Unauthorized Access: Limits unpermitted application activity.

In the professional sector, BlackBerry Cylance is leveraged to protect crucial infrastructure through a robust approach accommodating environments with limited connectivity. Its widespread deployment in industries, including healthcare and finance, is attributed to its ease of deployment and comprehensive protection capabilities. However, enhancements in reporting, pricing structures, and technical support are avenues for development, reflecting user feedback for improving detection rates and overall dashboard usability.

BlackBerry

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, powered by XGen security, leverages a blend of cross-generational threat protection techniques to safeguard a wide range of network attached storage systems by detecting and removing viruses and spyware in real time. This comprehensive storage security uses the industry-standard ICAP protocol to complement support for traditional RPC communication protocols. To simplify network protection for EMC, NetApp, and Hitachi Data Systems storage systems, ServerProtect for Storage provides automatic, incremental security updates and centralized management of servers via a web-based console.

Trend Micro

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Siemens

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect

April 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.