BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

BlackBerry and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.4, while WatchGuard is ranked #43 with an average rating of 9.0. BlackBerry holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

3,417 Views
2,603 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

WatchGuard EPDR

Read 5 WatchGuard EPDR reviews

659 Views
542 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

WatchGuard EPDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and WatchGuard EPDR are key competitors in the cybersecurity sector. WatchGuard EPDR has an advantage due to its extensive feature set and integrated management capabilities.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity excels in AI-driven threat detection, preventing threats with minimal resource usage and zero-day threat defense. It integrates well with other security platforms, maintaining efficient system performance. WatchGuard EPDR offers comprehensive endpoint protection with features like patch management, threat detection, and control over applications and websites, providing a complete defense approach.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance could enhance its patch management and expand its feature set for more comprehensive protection. The product could also provide more centralized management capabilities and improve user interface customization options. WatchGuard EPDR might benefit from reducing setup costs and refining its AI-driven threat analysis. Enhancing mobile device support and streamlining its extensive features for easier user navigation could further improve its offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance offers a streamlined deployment with AI-based automation and strong, responsive customer support. WatchGuard EPDR provides cloud-based management for flexible deployment complemented by detailed customer support for guidance. Both products ease of deployment stands out, but WatchGuard's cloud flexibility and comprehensive management are notable advantages.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance requires a lower initial setup cost, leveraging advanced AI for improved ROI. WatchGuard EPDR incurs a higher setup cost but its extensive features and enhanced security offset this expense, potentially resulting in a positive long-term ROI with its comprehensive protection capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WatchGuard EPDR

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

43rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Phillip Evely

Network Administrator at Cape Breton Regional Municipality

Provides good reporting features, saves time, and protects endpoints

The setup is very easy. We have deployed the solution on-premise but can also do it on the cloud. It has a cloud functionality. I can push it from the cloud directly to the endpoint, or I can do it via a group policy. The enterprise-wide deployment takes a day. It is very simple. Once the agent is deployed in any subnet, it monitors the network traffic and informs me about endpoints that don't have the agent. I get alerted via a report. If I have a problem, I can manually deploy on those endpoints. The product is set to auto-update. It updates on its own.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is pretty easy to scale."

"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."

"It handles situations that the other threat management tools wouldn't find. It has worked well covering the weaker sides of the other products that we're integrating."

"The solution is easy to deploy."

"We chose the solution because it doesn't have daily updates, which is important for us in healthcare IT, where network usage and connectivity to hospitals matter."

"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."

"The platform's most valuable features are the malware detection capabilities."

"I find the actual overall endpoint malware protection the most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"The reporting feature is valuable."

"WatchGuard EPDR improves organization primarily by supporting the IT team rather than the end users directly. It helps IT teams accomplish more with fewer people. One of its standout features is the patch management solution, which allows companies without up-to-date services like WSUS to manage patches for Windows and Linux systems. Additionally, it provides the usual endpoint protection features such as virus and malware protection, application control, and website control."

"WatchGuard is commendable for its work on threats."

"I can put tons of load on it."

"The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks."

Cons

"CylancePROTECT's dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly."

"The product needs to continue to offer better alerts. In particular, around false positives. It needs to reduce them from happening."

"The security scripting needs improvement. It needs deeper security for scripting."

"It should provide more details about the events that they have detected."

"The solution should implement AI in the product."

"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."

"The OPTICS component could be made more user-friendly with respect to giving people more information."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive. When a URL is not categorized, I face issues."

"The AV and scanning features could be a little bit better."

"WatchGuard EPDR does have areas for improvement. One significant gap is the lack of a virtual patching feature integrated into the endpoint security. This would be particularly useful for endpoints running operating systems that are no longer supported, such as Windows 7."

"The product is available at a very high price, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product cost is about $5, per user, per month."

"Shop around for sure and be assured the price you pay will be close to other solutions available, but even at a slight mark-up from the other solutions, you are getting real endpoint protection versus nothing more than a cheap security blanket that might keep you warm at night."

"It is expensive, but not unreasonable."

"Currently, we have competitive pricing for Cylance, which is affordable enough to consider."

"Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc."

"We went through a third party initially to do the renewal, but we won't be renewing, we will move on to something else."

"My company is on a yearly CylancePROTECT subscription. Price-wise, the solution is slightly expensive, so I'd rate it as eight out of ten."

"The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"The solution's pricing is better compared to other products."

"The product is available at a high price."

"The price is excellent."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Security Firm

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

The pricing is slightly high, but the product quality justifies it. The price is fair, neither too high nor too low. Considering all its features, an increase in price would be justifiable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I have not found anything requiring improvement. However, overall, the category level should be enhanced. The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive. When a URL is not categor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 21% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 5% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Panda Adaptive Defense 360 vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 31% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 13% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 6% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

April 2025

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

March 2025

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

No data available

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance provides endpoint security, threat protection, and antivirus capabilities, using AI and machine learning for protection against malware and ransomware on desktops, servers, and virtual machines worldwide. Its AI-driven threat detection operates even with limited internet, facilitating effective threat management.

BlackBerry Cylance's centralized dashboard simplifies threat management and vulnerability protection for organizations globally. The platform combines AI and machine learning to deliver superior zero-day threat protection and minimize CPU usage, offering stable and accurate threat detection without frequent updates. It includes tools like CylanceOPTICS and CylancePERSONA for enhanced user behavior monitoring and adopts a proactive approach that effectively manages threats at various lifecycle stages. Renowned for stability and performance, it efficiently prevents unauthorized applications while maintaining system productivity.

What are the main features of BlackBerry Cylance?

Minimal CPU Usage: Efficiently operates without taxing computer resources.
AI and Machine Learning: Advanced technology for zero-day threat protection.
Lightweight Design: Functions without constant updates for simplified usage.
Centralized Management: Offers a user-friendly, intuitive dashboard.
CylanceOPTICS and PERSONA: Tools for in-depth user behavior analysis.

What are key benefits to look for in user reviews?

Effective Malware Detection: Recognized accuracy in identifying security threats.
Proactive Threat Mitigation: Actively detects and manages threats.
Stability and Performance: Consistent protection without hampering system performance.
Reduced Unauthorized Access: Limits unpermitted application activity.

In the professional sector, BlackBerry Cylance is leveraged to protect crucial infrastructure through a robust approach accommodating environments with limited connectivity. Its widespread deployment in industries, including healthcare and finance, is attributed to its ease of deployment and comprehensive protection capabilities. However, enhancements in reporting, pricing structures, and technical support are avenues for development, reflecting user feedback for improving detection rates and overall dashboard usability.

BlackBerry

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR

April 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.