Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Blackberry UEM vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
198
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (2nd), Remote Access (1st), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (1st)
Blackberry UEM
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (16th)
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (20th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (18th)
 

Featured Reviews

Ted Mbugua - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 30, 2024
Helps improve visibility, control, and ease of management
Intune brings all of the endpoint and security management tools into one place. They have also integrated it with non-Microsoft operating systems, which is a huge plus. Consolidating endpoint and security management tools into a single platform offers significant benefits for our IT and security operations teams. With centralized visibility, they can gain better control over their systems, identify potential vulnerabilities, and take proactive measures to protect customer data. This enhanced oversight empowers them to address security gaps effectively and ensure a more secure environment. From the user perspective, the Intune experience is exceptional for those familiar with it. However, for those still learning the technology, it suggests that Intune is user-friendly and straightforward to comprehend. Intune offers administrators enhanced visibility, control, and ease of management. Patching and updating devices is streamlined, while end users benefit from simplified onboarding, intuitive usage, and robust security features like conditional access. Intune is essential for safeguarding data on company and BYOD devices, especially in hybrid environments. Intune significantly enhances IT productivity within our customers' organizations. Before Intune, administrators often struggled with visibility and management, particularly for mobile devices and laptops. They wasted time searching for assets and deploying numerous tools to achieve visibility and enforce management policies. Intune streamlines this process by eliminating the need for hundreds of agents. Simply implementing Intune provides the necessary visibility and management capabilities. Intune offers significant cost savings. By comparing its licensing model to third-party solutions, we can easily see the return on investment in terms of reduced business expenses. Intune can help businesses save between 35 and 45 percent. Intune simplifies vendor management by providing visibility into end-of-life dates for most hardware, especially laptops. This makes it easier for administrators to monitor the support status of both software and hardware. By tracking updates and end-of-life information from various vendors, administrators can easily view this data in a consolidated summary. Before implementing Intune, their security posture was significantly lacking, with most organizations scoring below 20 percent. However, after Intune deployment, especially for banks, compliance became a crucial factor. Intune’s recommendations on improving security scores, particularly Secure Scores, have been instrumental in boosting their ratings to between 75 and 85 percent. The consolidation has impacted licensing costs due to centralized oversight and dashboards. This raises questions about whether we should continue with the current approach or explore alternative options like Microsoft or a more standardized solution. There is a significant cost advantage to vendor consolidation and visibility.
BS
Jul 28, 2023
An affordable solution to control BlackBerry applications but has latency issues
We use this solution to control BlackBerry applications for our clients. We were using BlackBerry tools to access emails on our phones, and clients had to install the BlackBerry application on their devices. The BlackBerry application controlled these applications, similar to Symantec VIP manager…
Joseck Wekesa - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 9, 2023
It integrates well with other solutions, but the vendor needs more of a local presence and faster response
You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features. I would like to see Trellix add database activity monitoring. They don't have a plan for this, and there isn't a significant roadmap around it. They have an enterprise service manager, which is sort of like a SIEM, but there is no roadmap. I want to see a clearer roadmap for integrating specific critical solutions like PAM and other things, too.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The stability is good."
"While I don't think you can ever have full visibility and control, Intune certainly allows us to see the applications being used and tells us if things like Windows patches aren't applied to machines. It does a good job. That visibility makes life a little easier."
"Maturity makes it a stable product."
"Its protection policies are most valuable. It protects mobile devices as well as individual apps. It is pretty scalable, and its documentation is also pretty good. It is also pretty straightforward to deploy."
"One of the main features of the solution is it allows the management of many devices in different ways."
"One of the best features is Windows Autopilot because if you change any of your devices, whatever security policies and compliance policies that applied can be easily migrated to the new devices. Windows Autopilot gives you that flexibility."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"It's easy to manage and easy to configure."
"The solution has a lot of features, such as adding different applications and devices to one platform. This allowed us to manage many devices and applications from a single platform."
"It's good that it periodically scans all my drives. I can stay up to date with the status of my drivers and update them if needed."
"The seamless deployment is very valuable."
"It's a stable solution with good performance."
"The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features."
"FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front."
"HIPS protects server files from being modified or deleted by unauthorized users. It's primarily deployed in the web tier."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."
"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."
 

Cons

"The solution can have some compliance problems in general and the end-point user can bypass easily the company policies in Intune."
"We only have major classifications for iOS and Android, but there are different brands that have different cycles of updates. If they can fine-tune it to make it more brand-specific, that would be even better."
"I'd suggest adding more features for macOS in Intune. There should be more functionality for managing macOS. There should be a better capability for pushing things down on macOS. Currently, Intune is not capable of managing macOS at the same level as Windows."
"Improvements can be made by allowing server integrations since it is an area where the product currently has shortcomings."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"Areas for improvement in Intune include expanding support beyond Samsung devices to accommodate other Android manufacturers like Redmi and Motorola."
"They can improve their MAM policies a little bit more and make them more granular. They should include more granular group policies. They are there, but they need to be more granular. Its stability should also be improved. It is not very stable. Sometimes, it shows some inconsistencies across tenants."
"I want more secure, reliable, and efficient security policies."
"The solution is complicated for new users. There are a lot of buttons on the first page. It can be very confusing if you’re not aware of the terms they use. For example, a button labelled ‘edit device’ doesn't explain exactly what it does or how to use it."
"The central monitoring dashboard needs improvement."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
"I hope the solution can be used in cloud systems going forward."
"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."
"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."
"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs we leave up to the customer and these vary from one to another."
"While Microsoft Intune boasts a wide range of features, its user-friendliness and bundled licensing cost are key considerations for me."
"It is not expensive."
"It comes as a bundle, so you do not really know what the prices are. Microsoft does not break it down to the user cost for us. It is just bundled with our E5 license."
"Intune is moderately expensive. You can get the license bundled with Office 365 E3 or E5 licenses. The E5s are a bit expensive, but you get some cheaper solutions with Intune."
"The price could be better."
"Pricing can be improved."
"The price of Intune is often included as part of a bundle with other Microsoft licenses, which makes it somewhat cheaper."
Information not available
"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."
"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."
"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
25%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
7%
No data available
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?
Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...
What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...
How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...
What do you like most about Blackberry UEM?
The solution has a lot of features, such as adding different applications and devices to one platform. This allowed u...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry UEM?
The solution is cheaper than Outlook. Regarding maintenance, it is not maintained like Microsoft Outlook.
What needs improvement with Blackberry UEM?
The solution is complicated for new users. There are a lot of buttons on the first page. It can be very confusing if ...
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effec...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager
No data available
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway
Information Not Available
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Omnissa, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM). Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.