Bonita vs Make comparison

Bonitasoft and Make are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Bonitasoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.2, while Make is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Bonitasoft holds a 5.2% mindshare in PA, compared to Make’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Make users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

2,634 Views
1,957 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Make

Read 2 Make reviews

287 Views
199 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Bonita

Make

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Bonita and Make are in the workflow automation tools category, each targeting process streamlining. While Bonita is recognized for comprehensive BPM solutions, Make offers an edge in terms of rapid deployment and dynamic connectivity, favoring teams seeking quick integration.

Features:Bonita is strong in process modeling, execution capabilities, and extensive customization through a modular design, making it highly adaptable for complex workflows. Make stands out with ease of use, dynamic connectivity, and a no-code interface for straightforward automation, catering to non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Bonita offers a detailed deployment model with extensive documentation and support channels, requiring more time and technical expertise, ideal for dedicated IT resources. Make's deployment is simpler and faster, with intuitive setup processes and accessible customer assistance.

Pricing and ROI:Bonita involves higher initial setup costs due to detailed implementation but promises long-term returns through powerful BPM capabilities. Make provides competitive pricing focused on reducing implementation time and costs, delivering immediate value with cost-effective automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. Make Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. Make

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Process Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (10th), Business Process Management (BPM) (14th)

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

30th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bonita is 5.2%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Yaniv Ivgi

Business Owner at Chatbot-sales

An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation

Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make should inform them with guidance before you make the mistake. There is a lot of data you can confuse.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Development of forms and flows."

"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."

"The user interface is easy to use."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

More Bonita pros

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

Cons

"The dashboard has limited features."

"There is a considerable learning curve."

"We are struggling a bit with integrations."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

"It is missing some important features that other products have."

"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."

"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."

"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."

More Bonita cons

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"The Community Edition comes free of charge."

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

Make is cheaper than Zapier.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

We use Make to manipulate data, cut the numbers, take this line of code, and translate it to another line of code. SaaS products use XML, and other products use JSON. You need to translate to commu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 56% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 17% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Camunda vs Make

Compared 68% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 32% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

April 2025

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

April 2025

Download Make product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Integromat

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

Visualize everything you do

Make lets you visually build workflows to solve complex problems - the way you imagine them in your mind.

Drag and drop to connect apps
Use the playful drag-and-drop builder to connect apps in a few clicks, and build workflows called scenarios.

Design infinite workflows
Build scenarios with as many steps or apps as you need.

Watch data flow in real time
Build your scenario and watch it run in real time. Schedule your scenario to run instantly or whenever you need it.

Make

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

Buan Consulting, Armadia

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. Make

April 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. Make

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. Make and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. Make report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.