Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs SwaggerHub comparison

Boomi and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Management category. Boomi is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.7, while SmartBear is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.6. Boomi holds a 0.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to SmartBear’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...

Read 9 Boomi AtomSphere API Management reviews

812 Views
563 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SwaggerHub

Read 10 SwaggerHub reviews

2,076 Views
1,601 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...

SwaggerHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

SwaggerHub and Boomi AtomSphere API Management are competitive platforms in API management, each with distinct strengths. Data shows Boomi AtomSphere API Management offers a richer feature set, potentially providing greater long-term value.

Features: SwaggerHub offers a collaborative platform with tools for API design, testing, and management. It provides a straightforward environment for creating robust APIs, focusing on simplifying API creation. Boomi AtomSphere API Management delivers a comprehensive suite for integration and deployment, featuring seamless connectivity across applications and robust data handling capabilities through a low-code interface. It also offers enhanced operational efficiency, streamlining integration processes.

Room for Improvement: SwaggerHub could enhance its OpenAPI documentation accessibility and integrate more advanced features for complex needs. Improved tooling for larger deployments and enriched workflow options might benefit existing users. Boomi AtomSphere API Management could simplify its initial deployment and offer more user-friendly onboarding experiences. Enhancing documentation clarity and expanding community support could aid in navigating complex integrations more effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SwaggerHub is known for its easy deployment and reliable customer support, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized projects. In contrast, Boomi AtomSphere API Management, though requiring more effort in setup, compensates with robust integration capabilities, making it suitable for larger enterprises with more intricate needs.

Pricing and ROI: SwaggerHub stands out for competitive pricing and low setup costs, offering favorable ROI for straightforward API management needs. Meanwhile, Boomi AtomSphere API Management has higher upfront costs but justifies the investment through extensive features and potential returns in complex scenarios, making it a strong contender for comprehensive integration solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. SwaggerHub Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. SwaggerHub

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...

Ranking in API Management

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SwaggerHub

Ranking in API Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere API Management is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SwaggerHub is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

ShashankRavikumar

Chief Strategy Officer at GWC Data.AI

Enables real-time insights and secure API management for efficient customer interactions

The main improvement needed is the ability to have different base URLs for HTTP and HTTPS for different clients. Currently, I can have only one base URL for one atom. It would help if I could set up a proxy with different URLs within Boomi as a simple configuration instead of needing external applications. Also, Boomi can integrate AI to manage backend loads and provide insights into runtime engine consumption.

Read full review

SwaminathanSubramanian

Director/Enterprise Solutions Architect, Technology Advisor at Kyndryl

Facilitating enterprise-wide API governance and management

Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account. The scalability also needs enhancement, as it becomes flaky under increased load. Additionally, the versioning management could be improved to be on par with source code management tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of the solution is good."

"The product's stability is good."

"AtomSphere API Management is a simple platform that's easy to use. If you're using it on-prem, there's a little learning curve."

"Boomi allows for more secure URLs and easy customization of HTTP and HTTPS protocols, which I find very beneficial."

"We can develop almost any interface that we need."

"AtomSphere is tightly integrated into the Boomi iPaaS platform. And Boomi has been augmenting AtomSphere API Management for the past couple of years so version 2.0 is better than 1.0."

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a good product for integrating with Boomi as a backend service."

"Integrations take less time."

More Boomi AtomSphere API Management pros

"The scalability is endless."

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

"You can click & play and add the notation in a human-readable form. Spotlight is also very good in the graphical design of APIs."

"The tool's most valuable feature is licensing."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy and not at all difficult."

"The most valuable features are the collaboration between multiple teams and the control and distribution of specifications."

"It is quite a useful tool. It is quite good with the validation of the spec. It works quite well in terms of errors and conformity to the OpenAPI standard. It is better than Visual Studio Code in terms of editing."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

More SwaggerHub pros

Cons

"The solution must provide more AI services."

"The API management has room for improvement."

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management can be improved in terms of threshold management and policy management."

"To some degree, you need to know what type or amount of API you are creating - whether it's a rest API or web service API. You need to know ETL in order to really get the most out of Boomi."

"The product is really complex to manage."

"From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper."

"It's difficult to integrate the on-prem application with the Dell Boomi Cloud. We have to check to ensure the Dell domain engine is running. It just requires some service endpoints from our on-prem application to connect to Dell Boomi Cloud to make it available to integrate. It would be better if AtomSphere API Management were offered as a purely SaaS application, so I wouldn't need an on-prem component to make it available. We could make a test call or provide some connection parameters. That should enable it to pull the data."

"Scalability is an area where Boomi lacks."

More Boomi AtomSphere API Management cons

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"We have to use additional tools to test APIs."

"More integration and usability with the cloud microservices would be nice"

"SwaggerHub's UI needs to be improved as it looks very old school."

"The scalability aspect of SwaggerHub can be improved. It becomes a bit unreliable when the load is increased and isn't up to par with expectations for scalability."

"Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account."

"It has limited functionality...Unfortunately, some of its features are not what we need."

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

More SwaggerHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product can get very expensive quickly if you connect to multiple databases."

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a cheap product."

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management gives customers a good price. Price-wise, the product is good."

"The price is reasonable."

"The tool is cheap."

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

14%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere API Management?

Integrations take less time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere API Management?

In terms of pricing, Boomi is expensive for small companies due to its license model. For enterprise companies, it is cheaper than competitors like MuleSoft, as large enterprise accounts have huge ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere API Management?

See all answers

What do you like most about SwaggerHub?

The tool's most valuable feature is licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SwaggerHub?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SwaggerHub?

I started using SwaggerHub in its previous version, SmartMiner, with a tool called SoapUI. I used it to create mock web services to test web services and create test scripts and mock APIs. This usa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management

Compared 51% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management

Compared 27% of the time

Apigee vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management

Compared 22% of the time

More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Competitors

Microsoft Azure API Management vs SwaggerHub

Compared 28% of the time

Apigee vs SwaggerHub

Compared 22% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs SwaggerHub

Compared 9% of the time

Stoplight vs SwaggerHub

Compared 8% of the time

Postman vs SwaggerHub

Compared 6% of the time

More SwaggerHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere API Management

March 2025

Download Boomi AtomSphere API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

March 2025

Download SwaggerHub product report

Also Known As

Boomi API Management

No data available

Overview

Boomi API Management supports the full lifecycle of APIs in a hybrid environment. Configure APIs and expose real-time integrations effortlessly. Centrally test and deploy APIs and enforce contracts and policies with an API gateway. Monitor the health of APIs with usage dashboards and engage API developers using the catalog and developer portal.

Boomi

SwaggerHub is an integrated API Development platform, built for teams, that brings the core capabilities of the Swagger framework to design, build, document and deploy APIs. SwaggerHub enables development teams to collaborate and coordinate the entire lifecycle of an API with the flexibility to integrate with the toolset of your choice.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Avalara, Cornell University, Dropbox

Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. SwaggerHub

March 2025

Free Report: Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. SwaggerHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. SwaggerHub and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. SwaggerHub report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.