Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines processes, reduces errors, improves productivity, and enhances integration, automation, data visibility, and decision-making.
Sentiment score
7.5
Organizations saw significant ROI and efficiency from Jitterbit Vinyl, with faster application turnaround, budget adherence, and reduced development times.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi AtomSphere Flow's support is fast and knowledgeable, with some communication issues and varying responsiveness; resources aid users effectively.
Sentiment score
8.5
Jitterbit Vinyl's customer service is praised for its prompt, effective support and ability to adapt creatively to user needs.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is adaptable and scalable with manual adjustments, appreciated by teams for meeting expansion needs effectively.
Sentiment score
7.3
Users praise Jitterbit Vinyl for its seamless integration, scalability, reliable performance, and flexibility in supporting growing user bases and roles.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is reliable for typical use but struggles with large data volumes and has some bug issues.
Sentiment score
8.3
Jitterbit Vinyl is highly reliable, featuring excellent uptime, solid performance, seamless integration, and 100% uptime over six months.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
 

Room For Improvement

Boomi AtomSphere Flow needs a user-friendly interface, better stability, enhanced AI, and improved support for government sector suitability.
Users seek improved metadata handling, document upload speeds, flexible design, better text editor, intuitive themes, and enhanced B2C development.
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
 

Setup Cost

Boomi AtomSphere Flow provides cost-effective, flexible pricing based on user count and features, appealing to enterprise integration leaders.
Enterprise users praise Jitterbit Vinyl for its cost-effectiveness, transparent pricing, and valuable annual subscription model with minimal hidden costs.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
 

Valuable Features

Boomi AtomSphere Flow is praised for its ease of integration, low-code development, and cost-effective, scalable deployment.
Jitterbit Vinyl offers fast development, flexible integration, no-code tools, seamless migration, easy customization, robust UI, efficient workflows, and strong security.
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
21st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (22nd)
Jitterbit Vinyl
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
22nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (23rd), No-Code Development Platforms (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Pratibimb Dwivedi - PeerSpot reviewer
A competent solution for integrating enterprise-grade software
The solution is very stable. When it gets pushed to the limit, it starts breaking. For example, it's a bad design when you are using Dell Boomi for millions of records in processing, such as updating a database for millions of records. It doesn't work as efficiently. But if you're using it for a reasonable volume, it is a fantastic tool. Recently, for a client, we were having trouble processing because the volume of the data was high in terms of updating the table. Dell Boomi took about ten hours, but I know tools that could have done this in less time. Dell Boomi is probably not designed for these things; if you push the limits and try to anyway, it breaks.
LE
Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics
Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard. They have always been great at connecting to a variety of data sources. They are a leader in that space. They do a great job, from a business analyst perspective, helping you shape what the ultimate system is going to look like. There really aren't a lot of areas that need improvement. The areas that they have, they are keenly aware of and have made great strides in recent releases.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
5%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Consumer Goods Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft. I would rate the pricing at 6.5 to seven out of ten.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities. We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT. Additionall...
What do you like most about Zudy VINYL?
The ZPM system enables us to organize projects and monitor their progress. The ease of logging into the VINYL app to test new features makes testing smoother, and we feel more involved in the crea...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zudy VINYL?
Payment processing has changed since Jitterbit acquired Zudy. We previously cut checks, but we are no longer allowed. This has made paying for the service more complicated, but the issue is being r...
What needs improvement with Zudy VINYL?
Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult t...
 

Also Known As

Boomi Flow
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services
Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.