Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Celonis vs Scout Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Celonis
Ranking in Process Mining
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Scout Platform
Ranking in Process Mining
13th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (47th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Celonis is 38.1%, down from 39.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Scout Platform is 5.5%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

Shaif Tazir - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers easy integrations, end-to-end process view and an EMS feature to identify inefficiencies
Celonis' data engineering processes should be transformed into a low-code structure. Excessive coding is still required across the Starter Kits, where the market is focusing on low-code automation or transformations. The tool's UI should also be more intuitive. The data engineering pipeline within Celonis is highly technical. The interface in future versions of Celonis can have a drag-and-drop format with a more intuitive configuration. If you check other solutions like Power BI, business professionals can use it without technical experience, but usually, the same person won't be able to use Celonis freely. In the standard deployment of Celonis, you will need one project manager, an expert value architect, and two or three developers to manage the design pipeline. If your organization has a partner for executing all the Celonis pipelines, then it must be ensured that a COE is assigned in-house for hypercare needs. For instance, if some KPIs need to be changed or if irrelevancy is found, maintenance needs to be implemented every year or every six months for KPI adjustments and rebuilding of sources or logic. The aforementioned maintenance tasks for Celonis are usually carried out by an in-house COE; without a COE, maintenance can become challenging.
Use Scout Platform?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?
SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...
What do you like most about Celonis?
Celonis, especially for high-risk finance-related processes, helped us make precise decisions and uncover hidden values within our architecture. It was one of the most significant values our busine...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?
The price is a little bit expensive when compared to others. That said, it offers features that other competitors don't have.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Soroco Automation
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool
Bayer, Amazon, Chubb, Mars, Dedalus, HDFC Life, Cetera, Prione, American Modern Insurance, Mountain America Credit Union, Ocwen Financial Services, IQEQ, 
Find out what your peers are saying about Automation Anywhere, Microsoft, Celonis and others in Process Mining. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.