Checkmk vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

Checkmk and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.5, while ManageEngine is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4. Checkmk holds a 3.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

3,438 Views
3,086 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 51 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

3,524 Views
2,081 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Checkmk

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Checkmk compete in the network monitoring software category. ManageEngine OpManager may have the upper hand with its comprehensive monitoring capabilities and user-friendly deployment, while Checkmk stands out for its streamlined operations and modern alert system.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers extensive network monitoring, real-time alerting, and automation for service recovery, making it ideal for diverse network environments. It supports easy deployment and manages a wide range of network devices. Checkmk provides an efficient auto-discovery feature that simplifies setup, strong integration capabilities, and reliable alerting for immediate issue response.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could improve by simplifying its complex configuration, enhancing support responsiveness, and expanding storage monitoring functions. Users suggest more intuitive dashboards and possible AI integration. Checkmk may benefit from improved third-party system integration, a more user-friendly interface, and better data presentation for those less familiar with its existing format.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager offers on-premises and public cloud deployment, though users note challenges with insufficient local expertise and delayed issue resolution. Its technical support is generally responsive. Checkmk is available for both on-premises and private cloud deployment, with customer service known for prompt and effective support, though it lacks 24/7 availability.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is seen as cost-effective, with a flexible licensing model and potential discounts on bundles. Users find the ROI quick, reducing admin overheads. Checkmk is noted for its affordability and straightforward pricing, appealing to organizations with tighter budgets. Its streamlined operations and efficient alert system contribute to a rapid ROI by minimizing downtime.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,651 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (13th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 3.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

More Checkmk pros

"I liked Network Configuration Manager. They had some pretty decent features there, and they also had pretty good monitoring and alerts."

"ManageEngine OpManager is user-friendly and easy to use. Additionally, useful for basic monitoring."

"We have found the solution to be stable."

"I am satisfied with ManageEngine OpManager's monitoring features."

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts. The administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately. This is the feature we value and use the most."

"Some of the most valuable features are the accessibility of the solution and the fact that it is simpler than other products. For example, discovering devices in the network is very simple, making it user-friendly."

"You can put all of your work on there, they'll send you an email or send you a text. That functionality as a network engineer is the one I like the most. I do like the fact that we can schedule reports. That works too because that's a lot fewer spreadsheets that I have to create."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

Cons

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

More Checkmk cons

"Real user and UI monitoring are not practical."

"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on. I don't think that's the problem but I don't do the server. But it is slow. When you're interacting with it, it could be more nimble and could be faster."

"The licensing for this solution is not straightforward and should be improved."

"We had some stability issues at the outset that have since been resolved."

"The data provided by the tool is not accurate."

"It is sometimes difficult to manage the user interface. It can get very complicated."

"The licensing model is confusing."

"ManageEngine OpManager could improve the default dashboards that are available. We are not able to customize them easily and they do not give us the information we need unless we customize them. You need to have the technical knowledge to be able to do it, the customization should be easier."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The product is affordable."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The solution is highly affordable"

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive."

"The price for ManageEngine OpManager is average."

"The pricing is moderate."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

49%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I frequently program functions with PowerShell, and although Bash could be used, my specialization is in PowerShell. Two of us focus on programming in PowerShell for infrastructure optimization. I ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Currently, I use two Dell PowerStore systems, and I'm responsible for disposing of systems in our environment. We need to upgrade our systems, but we are working on less pressing issues. Right now,...

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 50% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 10% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 6% of the time

Observium vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 3% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 24% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

March 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

March 2025

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Also Known As

No data available

OpManager

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Checkmk

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager

March 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.