Checkmk vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

Checkmk and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while ManageEngine is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1. Checkmk holds a 3.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 7 Checkmk reviews

3,289 Views
2,984 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 50 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

3,724 Views
2,185 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Checkmk

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Checkmk compete in the network monitoring software category. ManageEngine OpManager may have the upper hand with its comprehensive monitoring capabilities and user-friendly deployment, while Checkmk stands out for its streamlined operations and modern alert system.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers extensive network monitoring, real-time alerting, and automation for service recovery, making it ideal for diverse network environments. It supports easy deployment and manages a wide range of network devices. Checkmk provides an efficient auto-discovery feature that simplifies setup, strong integration capabilities, and reliable alerting for immediate issue response.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could improve by simplifying its complex configuration, enhancing support responsiveness, and expanding storage monitoring functions. Users suggest more intuitive dashboards and possible AI integration. Checkmk may benefit from improved third-party system integration, a more user-friendly interface, and better data presentation for those less familiar with its existing format.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager offers on-premises and public cloud deployment, though users note challenges with insufficient local expertise and delayed issue resolution. Its technical support is generally responsive. Checkmk is available for both on-premises and private cloud deployment, with customer service known for prompt and effective support, though it lacks 24/7 availability.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is seen as cost-effective, with a flexible licensing model and potential discounts on bundles. Users find the ROI quick, reducing admin overheads. Checkmk is noted for its affordability and straightforward pricing, appealing to organizations with tighter budgets. Its streamlined operations and efficient alert system contribute to a rapid ROI by minimizing downtime.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,071 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (12th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 3.1%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.9%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Tanveer Khalid

Technical Consultant at Kidan

Offers automation capabilities, ability to manage the entire network, and provides real-time monitoring of network utilization

For network performance, there are so many tools in OpManager for your network. You can manage your servers and processes as well. Processes are the Windows services running in the background. They are what you see in the task manager when you check how many are being run by Windows or the machine. OpManager can manage these processes. If one isn't running, you can reboot or start it or write a script for the situation. For example, if there's a server issue at night, a rule will automatically run in the background and reboot the services. OpManager will do all of that, and the services will come back online. It can resolve those types of issues on its own. And it's automated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"The alerting feature has improved our organization. We can create multiple alerts and refine them to how we need to use them."

"The ease of use and comprehensive integration are the most valuable features"

"The solution's most valuable features are reporting, event notifications, and alert management."

"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."

"OpManager can monitor network utilization, downtime, and services in real time."

"The traffic monitoring and the traffic analysis are great."

"We have found the solution to be stable."

"The product provides intensive reports."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

Cons

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"WMI and SNMP integration with the domain controller should be seamless"

"This product is little bit slow sometimes. It may be that we need to change the configuration to improve performance."

"ManageEngine OpManager could improve the default dashboards that are available. We are not able to customize them easily and they do not give us the information we need unless we customize them. You need to have the technical knowledge to be able to do it, the customization should be easier."

"The dashboard could include more features."

"We would like the solution's customize and build functionality to be more user-friendly."

"The solution's reports need to include the number of applications consumed."

"We encounter challenges in monitoring cloud services. I would also appreciate it if there was someone available to walk you through the documentation."

"The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"The product is affordable."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"We had perpetual licenses. The cost was around 36,000 for OPManager, and then you'd have the yearly maintenance fee of 2,000 or 3,000."

"The pricing is moderate."

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The price for ManageEngine OpManager is average."

"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

55%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working. But basically, we're okay with it. The difficult part was adapting fro...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

We use it to monitor mainly Linux servers, including operating system metrics, processes, services, and so on. We also use scripting and monitoring logs.

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

The product has only basic functionalities. It is not like SolarWinds. The data provided by the tool is not accurate. SolarWinds is more accurate.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 48% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 12% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 5% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

Observium vs Checkmk

Compared 3% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 27% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 10% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 8% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 7% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

January 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

January 2025

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Also Known As

No data available

OpManager

Learn More

Checkmk

ManageEngine

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager

January 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.