Datadog and Cisco Intersight compete in the monitoring and automation sector. Datadog holds an advantage due to its extensive capabilities and seamless integrations, appealing to a broader audience.
Features: Datadog offers sharable dashboards, TimeBoards, and comprehensive APIs. It integrates smoothly with cloud providers, being hosted to eliminate infrastructure concerns. Cisco Intersight emphasizes managing data center resources with cloud and on-premises integration but has a more niche focus.
Room for Improvement: Datadog could improve data handling and clarify pricing structures. Users request enhanced metrics integration and usage tracking. Cisco Intersight needs improvements in hybrid cloud management, automation, and third-party monitoring tool integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog is flexible across various cloud environments but may overwhelm new users with its features. Customer service is generally positive, though response speed has been mentioned. Cisco Intersight supports multiple cloud deployments and has effective technical support, yet interaction speed could improve.
Pricing and ROI: Datadog is considered expensive, justified if all features are used, but requires clear cost insights. Cisco Intersight is competitively priced with straightforward licensing and offers potential ROI through operational efficiencies and system visibility.
For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX.
Cisco provides better support than anyone else.
Some steps are not included in the official documentation, which can create challenges.
There is a significant issue regarding migration from UCS Manager into Intersight without formatting the Fabric Interconnects (FI), which is problematic in a production environment.
More products should be made compatible with iWORK, including more software and hardware.
The documentation is adequate, but team members coming into a project could benefit from more guided, interactive tutorials, ideally leveraging real-world data.
There should be a clearer view of the expenses.
The pricing mechanism sounds fair.
The setup cost for Datadog is more than $100.
This solution has provided time savings and required fewer people to operate this tool, rather than direct cost savings.
It provides visibility into other products and storage, and is beneficial for environments where Cisco and other vendors coexist, allowing full visibility of the entire infrastructure.
Intersight offers a simple monitor feature, which can be integrated with other Cisco products, while still providing a solution with another brand.
Our architecture is written in several languages, and one area where Datadog particularly shines is in providing first-class support for a multitude of programming languages.
The technology itself is generally very useful.
Cisco Intersight is Cisco’s systems management platform that delivers intuitive computing through cloud-powered intelligence. This platform offers a more intelligent level of management that enables IT organizations to analyze, simplify, and automate their environments in ways that were not possible with prior generations of tools. This capability empowers organizations to achieve significant savings in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and to deliver applications faster, so they can support new business initiates. The advantages of the model-based management of the Cisco UCS platform plus Cisco Intersight are extended to Cisco UCS servers and Cisco HyperFlex and Cisco HyperFlex Edge systems. Cisco HyperFlex Edge is optimized for remote sites, branch offices, and edge environments.
Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.
Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.
What are the key features of Datadog?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
