Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs Datadog comparison

Cisco and Datadog are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.1, while Datadog is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Cisco holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Datadog’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Datadog users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Datadog Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Datadog

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 802,829 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 4.4%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Shiva_Prasad

Senior Technical Consultant at Black Box Network Services

Jan 25, 2024

A cloud solution for warehousing with a troubleshooting feature

The initial setup is straightforward. It's based on user requirements. We also conduct heat mapping using a couple of tools. The only requirement is to understand the technical or configuration aspects from the user's end and then configure it. Mist takes no more than 15 to 20 minutes for a particular deployment. You need to understand the end user's environment and have a concrete plan on whether it's a greenfield installation or an existing one, considering the density and height. Based on that, we need to develop a passive heat map. Then, you need to discuss with the user to understand exactly what needs to be configured and what they require in their environment. Based on that, you can proceed with the installation. Additionally, you can perform post-installation heat mapping to ensure it matches the earlier heat map. I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

Read full review

Adolfo Gonzalez

Systems Consultant Director at Dasit

Jun 14, 2024

Helps improve my workflow by organizing and managing information efficiently

I use Cisco Data Center Network Manager to store information for different clients or customers in the data center It helps improve my workflow by organizing and managing this information efficiently. The monitoring capability is the best in Cisco Data Center Network Manager. It helps me…

Read full review

reviewer2045070

Software Engineering Manager at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees

Dec 6, 2022

Great CI visibility, logging, and monitoring

The most valuable aspects of the solution include: CI visibility, which helps us in making sure our CI systems are running efficiently and are not blocking our developers from releasing new software and fixing bugs. Logs, which help us in debugging issues where we can search for logs and can make sure they are relevant to the issues we are looking at. APM, which can help us to stay on top of our applications by giving us the confidence that our apps are running. Monitoring. We use monitoring a lot to ensure we know about potential issues and fix them before they affect our customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."

"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the consolidated dashboard, providing insights into parameters and overall usage of network features. It allows us to easily summarize insights through the dashboards. The solution offers automation capabilities, particularly in the context of connecting LAN sites with websites."

"The most valuable feature is the connectivity monitoring."

"The automation capability is more than enough. It depends on how we consider and integrate the automation engine. We need to ensure the automation engine and then how to perform it. It depends on the policy making, API integration, and other integrations."

"I don't have to rely on the on-site engineer who can do the configuration. I can have our team just plug the devices and perform remotely. I can also do the templates."

"We use the product to manage access points."

"It has a very nice dashboard so you can see what's currently happening in the network and the performance of the back story."

"I like that is easy to work on and straightforward."

"The most valuable features of Cisco Data Center Network Manager are consistency and the core server. The teams have had a good experience."

More Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) pros

"The solution is useful for monitoring logs."

"Datadog is constantly adding new features."

"Its integration is most valuable because you can integrate it with various service providers such as AWS, .Net, etc."

"Because of our client focus, it is easy for us to sell. This is because it is easy to use and easy to set up."

"Datadog dashboards are pretty great."

"Datadog has so far been a breeze to use and set up."

"Dashboards and their versatility are among the most valuable features."

"We've found it most useful for managing Rstudio Workbench, which has its own logs that would not be picked up via Cloudwatch."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."

"The technical support needs improvement."

"Sometimes the product gives us problems that require support."

"The automation feature could be improved."

"It would be nice to have the ability to more easily collect information from other software when doing some types of analysis."

"It's very costly."

"It's a relatively expensive product for some clients."

"The initial setup is challenging."

"If the customer thinks about using additional solutions, Cisco should make sure they are not left out."

"The tool should be more user-friendly and improve AI integration."

More Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) cons

"I would love to see support for front-end and mobile applications. Right now, it is mostly all back-end stuff. Being able to do some integration with our front-end products would be awesome."

"The dashboard could be improved. It would be helpful to get a view of specific things that we need to monitor for our application."

"Datadog could make their use cases more visible either through their docs or tutorial videos."

"They should continue expanding and integrating with more third-party apps."

"I found the documentation can sometimes be confusing."

"We need more advanced querying against logs."

"Additional metrics should be included."

"It can be overwhelming for new people as it has a lot of features."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"We usually opt for a yearly plan, commonly for three or five years upfront. Some customers may not utilize all the features included in the product, and this can lead to them paying for functionalities they don't need."

"On average, Data Center Network Manager's pricing isn't too costly unless you choose a premier license."

"The price of Cisco Data Center Network Manager is expensive compared to other vendors on the market."

"The solution is very expensive."

"The tool is always expensive, but their service, product quality, and support are good. We're happy with it, but it's still an expensive solution. There are cheaper alternatives but no similar platform across all domains."

"The product is licensed with contracts that work on a yearly basis rather than a monthly model."

"I would say that the pricing offers great value for the money."

"When we purchase a Nexus box, the MDS CM license comes with it."

"It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing."

"At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."

"If you do your homework, you'll find that if you're really concerned with cost, it's good."

"It has a module-based pricing model."

"The price is better than some competing products."

"It is easy to run up a large bill, so become familiar with the cost of each piece of your bill and use the metrics they supply to estimate and monitor your bill."

"The tool is open-source."

"It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

35%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

The technical support needs improvement.

See all answers

What do you like most about Cisco Data Center Network Manager?

It uses push technology, which pushes the changes to all relevant devices to ensure they are updated accordingly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Data Center Network Manager?

We usually opt for a yearly plan, commonly for three or five years upfront. Some customers may not utilize all the fe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Data Center Network Manager?

It's very costly. Most of our customers are actually looking for other cost-effective solutions. Even if it has very ...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems,...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several time...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was t...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 37% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 25% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 22% of the time

InfluxDB vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 16% of the time

More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Competitors

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 37% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 35% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 28% of the time

More Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 17% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 14% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 7% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

AppDynamics vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2024

Download Juniper Mist Premium Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2024

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) report

Download Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Datadog

September 2024

Download Datadog product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cisco Data Center Network Manager

No data available

Learn More

Juniper

Cisco

Datadog

Overview

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is a comprehensive network analytics solution that provides organizations with valuable insights into their network performance and user experience. The primary use case of this product is to enable IT teams to proactively monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize their network infrastructure.

The most valuable functionality of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is its AI-driven insights and recommendations. Leveraging machine learning algorithms, it analyzes vast amounts of network data to identify anomalies, predict potential issues, and suggest remediation actions. This proactive approach helps organizations minimize network downtime, improve user experience, and optimize network performance.

By providing real-time visibility into network performance, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics helps organizations quickly identify and resolve network issues. It offers detailed analytics on network traffic, application performance, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to pinpoint the root cause of problems and take immediate action. This not only reduces troubleshooting time but also enhances overall network reliability.

Furthermore, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics enables organizations to optimize their network infrastructure. It provides insights into network capacity utilization, application usage patterns, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to make informed decisions about network design, resource allocation, and capacity planning. This helps organizations to ensure that their network is efficiently utilized and can support the growing demands of their users.

The Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (NDFC) offers a comprehensive solution for managing Cisco NX-OS switches in hybrid-cloud environments, providing automation, visibility, and consistent operations. Designed to simplify and enhance data center management, NDFC integrates with Cisco Nexus Dashboard to streamline network connectivity, reduce deployment times, and ensure seamless transitions with minimal disruptions. Its modular architecture, new user interface, and support for non-Nexus OS platforms make it a robust tool for LAN, SAN, and IP Fabric for Media management. Additionally, NDFC enhances fabric reliability, automates workflows, and supports cloud connectivity with AWS and Microsoft Azure, making it ideal for businesses adapting to increasingly complex digital environments.

Datadog is a unified platform for cloud performance monitoring, log aggregation, APM, synthetic testing, security monitoring, and observability solutions for organizations monitoring AWS resources, applications, and more.

By combining powerful dashboards, logs, and metrics, Datadog simplifies cloud performance monitoring and incident management. It offers easy integration with AWS, flexible visualization capabilities, comprehensive APM features, and efficient log aggregation. Organizations leverage Datadog to monitor EC2, ECS, RDS, ElastiCache, Kubernetes, and other platforms, with integrations such as Slack, PagerDuty, and Terraform enhancing the incident management process. Centralized monitoring, real-time tracing, and detailed reporting ensure thorough system oversight.

What are Datadog's most important features?

Dashboards: Customizable dashboards providing valuable visualization and data analytics.
APM: Application performance monitoring to track application health and performance.
Log Aggregation: Efficient log collection and analysis from different sources.
Cloud Monitoring: Seamless integration for monitoring cloud resources and services.
Synthetic Testing: Proactive testing to detect issues before they affect users.
Integrations: Extensive tool integrations with services like Slack, PagerDuty, and Terraform.

What benefits should users look for?

Centralized Monitoring: Comprehensive monitoring of different components in one place.
Customizable Dashboards: Flexibility to create dashboards that fit specific needs.
Efficient Alerting: Timely alerts that improve incident response and resolution.
Real-time Monitoring: Live data tracking for proactive issue management.
Detailed Tracing: In-depth application and infrastructure traceability.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed insights fostering better system oversight.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, Datadog implements robust monitoring solutions to oversee critical infrastructure and applications. By leveraging its powerful APM, log aggregation, and alerting capabilities, organizations can ensure high availability, security, and performance of their digital services. Integration with AWS and other platforms helps maintain visibility and streamline operations across cloud environments, enhancing productivity and operational efficiency. Emphasizing customization and flexibility, Datadog assists in meeting specific monitoring needs and improving incident management processes in specialized industries.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Banco de Guayaquil, Cox Communications, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Roper St. Francis, University of British Columbia

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Datadog

September 2024

Free Report: Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Datadog

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Datadog and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Datadog report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.