Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) comparison

The compared Cisco and ExtraHop Networks solutions aren't in the same category. Cisco is ranked #13 in ID , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 3.0% mindshare in the category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #6 in NTA , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Read 20 Cisco Sourcefire SNORT reviews

2,183 Views
1,856 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x)

Read 15 ExtraHop Reveal(x) reviews

3,773 Views
1,849 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

ExtraHop Reveal(x)

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and ExtraHop Reveal(x) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Darktrace, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS).

To learn more, read our detailed Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,147 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (13th)

ExtraHop Reveal(x)

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (6th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is designed for Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) and holds a mindshare of 3.0%, up 2.6% compared to last year.
ExtraHop Reveal(x), on the other hand, focuses on Network Traffic Analysis (NTA), holds 6.7% mindshare, down 16.2% since last year.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT	3.0%
Darktrace	10.2%
Fortinet FortiGate	9.2%
Other	77.6%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ExtraHop Reveal(x)	6.7%
Darktrace	15.6%
Cisco Secure Network Analytics	8.8%
Other	68.9%

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772102

Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Logging and customizable rules have helped improve threat monitoring and detection

The logging is mainly what I consider one of the best features with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. Being able to log and store it in a file allows you to push it to a centralized repository. The logging and reporting help improve incident response. You should always be logging threats, any sort of misconfiguration, and anything that could be an issue. It's important to at least log and monitor it. The basic rules provide a good baseline in assessing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT's ability in providing real-time analytics for threat detection, but as a professional, you should look to constantly modify that baseline. They provide extensive customizability so you can define your own rules. The customizability allows it to be adaptable in protecting against diverse network threats to the constant change.

Read full review

Henri Heuvel

Technical Consultant at Axians

Cloud-based administration streamlines network security management

ExtraHop Reveal(x) can improve regarding integration capabilities. For instance, the market is getting really flooded with Microsoft Sentinel, and I know there is an integration possible, but the tools on the market right now indicate that integration should not be a skill from an integrator point of view. It should be quite easy for customers to integrate that solution into SOCs, SIEMs, or any other integration with other tools. There are various integrations from which there's a manual on how to do it, but specifically, the Microsoft portfolio, particularly Sentinel, integration is not yet there. If you score them on a scale of one to ten, ExtraHop scores around a 7.5 to an 8 on an integration basis, but there's actually room for improvement on that side. In the older days, ExtraHop had a license model where you could do all you can eat, so if you had a sensor with 10 gig of capacity, you could use all the entire 10 gig of throughput. They changed that to an asset-based license model, and that's an absolute downside of the solution, where it is harder for smaller companies to acquire the solution itself. That has given us quite some problems in positioning the solution properly within the network, so the licensing model is an absolute downside where they need to improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Users have access to intelligent security automation as one of the features, which can easily automate your event impact assessment so your IPS policy tuning can be done as well as your network behavior analysis, and you can do real-time contextual awareness with correlation of events created on your applications, user devices, operating systems, or vulnerabilities, with all of this real-time data captured including your apps and port scans."

"In general, the features are all great. However, if I need to take hardware for ASA, because they need to upgrade to Firepower, we want to create rules. For that, most of the time we go to the command line. Right now Firepower is working really hard on the grid. You can apply all those rules to the grid. Even if you want to monitor the logs, for example, the activity will tell you which particular user has been blocked because of that rule. Firepower's monitoring interface is very good, because you can see each and every piece. ASA also had it, but there you needed to type the command and be under the server to see all that stuff. In Firepower you have the possibility to go directly to the firewall. The way the monitoring is displayed is also very nice. The feature I appreciate most in Firepower is actually the grid. The grid has worked very well."

"Scalability is something that Cisco has always cared about."

"We primarily use this solution as an intrusion prevention system for external firewalls and deploy the solution on-premises."

"The whole solution is very good, and stable."

"The tool's most valuable feature is threat detection, which is important because we have multiple layers not only in Cisco."

"The most valuable feature is the visibility that we have across the virtual environment."

"This solution makes life a lot easier as there are fewer man-hours required and we no longer need too many resources to manage it."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT pros

"Reveal X integrates seamlessly with CrowdStrike. If you see something sketchy on the network, you can quarantine devices through ExtraHop and it'll push to the CrowdStrike server."

"The solution's initial setup process is easy."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the depth of information that's available."

"We've done our due diligence and research on other products such as Riverbed and NetScout, and this product is by far the supreme leader."

"The solution offers a friendly GUI for security features."

"The most valuable features of ExtraHop Reveal(x) are the detection and alerting of network behavior and anomalies."

"We had useful information within the hour of deployment."

"With ExtraHop Reveal(x), it gives me more visibility into the packets. It doesn't provide the entire packet capture, but it offers more information on how connections are made at the network layer. This can be helpful for detecting network attacks. Additionally, I really like the customizable dashboards and reports. The incident dashboard and alerts provide a good summary initially, and diving deeper into them gives more detailed information. It's also great for analyzing specific attacks and victim logs. The feature that tracks the full attack chain makes it easier to monitor the progress of attacks. Plus, it's connected to the Netria.com app, which I find useful for certain tasks."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) pros

Cons

"The pricing needs to be improved. We have lots of low-budget clients around us. Budget constraints are always a deterrent in our market."

"I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it."

"The pricing needs to be improved."

"The solution's approach to managing traffic blocking is confusing and impractical."

"I would like to have analytics included in the suite."

"I don't think this solution is a time-based control system, because one cannot filter traffic based on time."

"With the next release, I would like to see some PBR, so that you can do the configuration with the features."

"Performance needs improvement."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT cons

"ExtraHop Reveal(x) could improve by allowing a longer look back in the feature. Right now you have a limit of 30 days to look back on your activity. I've used Darktrace before, and they allow you the ability to play back events. This would be a good feature to have in ExtraHop Reveal(x)."

"There is a little training online, but it'd be cool if ExtraHop provided certifications. CrowdStrike does elective training that gives you a certification as a Falcon administrator. It'd be nice to see ExtraHop have something like that"

"I would like to see more cloud capability."

"Netflow - Processing Netflow can be cumbersome as it requires triggers to truly gain value and insight. This in turn can add a bit of load to the hardware. The focus of ExtraHop Reveal (x) is live packet data."

"Agent management could certainly use some focus. It should also be a little bit easier to work with collections. We should be able to nest collections within collections. There should be better nesting."

"It needs integration with more security vendors."

"The support from ExtraHop Reveal(x) is sporadic, it can be good and it can be poor."

"I would rate the price a three out of five. It could be less expensive."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."

"If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five."

"Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."

"We have a three-year license for this solution."

"The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."

"I rate the price of ExtraHop Reveal(x) a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price."

"I would rate the price a three out of five. It could be less expensive."

"I rate ExtraHop Reveal(x) six out of 10 for affordability. We pay for an annual license. It's always one of those trade-offs. You get a lot of value, but ExtraHop isn't exorbitantly priced. You can pay extra for additional features like the ability to decode HL7 traffic, which is crucial for EMR environments."

"The solution is based on an annual subscription model and is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

University

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five. There are some other tools in the market that are more expensive than Cisco. There are no additional c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

I have not had much experience with the community-driven rule set while utilizing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. I don't have experience with recognizing zero-day vulnerabilities, but based on my knowledg...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

Endpoint protection is the main use case. The main aspect involves specifying different rules, and when network traffic hits these rules, it will try to block the traffic or at least log the traffi...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

We just did an assessment for our 47 datacenters around North America. The top two enterprise-level network monitoring solutions were ExtraHop first, Riverbed SteelCenter second. Their negotiated c...

See all answers

What open source tool can one use to measure bandwidth from one's upstream service provider?

One I am looking closely at is AppNeta. They have an appliance that can digest the flow and do a better job than Netflow. The other one we are using is ExtraHop. This has both a Datacenter Hig...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ExtraHop Reveal(x)?

We manage the setup cost ourselves, so I am quite happy with that. I also had engagement with professional services from ExtraHop, and it wasn't bad, but I was not impressed; it's not academic work...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 9% of the time

ExtremeCloud IQ vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 9% of the time

TrendAI Tipping Point vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 8% of the time

Fortra's Tripwire Enterprise vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Competitors

Darktrace vs ExtraHop Reveal(x)

Compared 18% of the time

Vectra AI vs ExtraHop Reveal(x)

Compared 12% of the time

Corelight Open NDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x)

Compared 8% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs ExtraHop Reveal(x)

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x)

Compared 5% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

July 2026

Download Cisco Sourcefire SNORT product report

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x)

July 2026

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) product report

Also Known As

Sourcefire SNORT

Reveal(x), Revealx

Overview

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is a versatile cybersecurity tool offering threat detection, scalability, and integration with Cisco tools. It is recognized for ease of configuration and comprehensive protection, making it suitable for intrusion prevention and firewall applications.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT provides advanced malware protection and integrates seamlessly with Cisco products. It enables automatic IPS tuning, real-time visibility, and intelligent security automation, which together enhance network security. Users benefit from its URL filtering, email spam elimination, and it delivers low false positives. Though highly effective, feedback highlights a desire for improvements in stability, dashboard effectiveness, traffic blocking customizations, and integration with Cisco DNA Center. Cost concerns and calls for cloud-based deployments also emerge in user feedback. Technical support and performance are also discussed, with VPN configuration posing challenges.

What are the key features of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates network threats efficiently.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.
Cisco Integration: Works smoothly with existing Cisco infrastructure.
Advanced Malware Protection: Provides comprehensive security against sophisticated threats.
Real-Time Visibility: Offers live insights into network activity.
Automatic IPS Tuning: Adjusts security policies dynamically.

What benefits can be found in user reviews?

Ease of Configuration: Streamlined setup process.
Comprehensive Protection: Low false positive rates ensuring broader security.
Robust Support: Access to extensive Cisco support network.

Organizations primarily deploy Cisco Sourcefire SNORT for network security in sectors like finance and healthcare. Used extensively in data centers with Cisco Firepower, it provides intrusion prevention, URL filtering, and VPN security. Pre-configured settings make it practical for on-premises deployment, ensuring secure user-to-server and server-to-server interactions.

Cisco

ExtraHop Reveal(x) offers advanced network visibility and threat detection through seamless integration with CrowdStrike. It enhances security with machine learning-driven behavioral analysis and customizable dashboards.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) excels in network detection and response by decrypting SSL traffic and providing real-time packet inspection. Users benefit from its dynamic triggers and historical data tracing. The platform is valued for its depth of information, powerful analytics, and cloud-based administration. It allows effective monitoring of attack chains and integrates with other solutions to boost security. However, there is room for improvement in pricing flexibility, licensing models, and integration capabilities, particularly with Microsoft Sentinel.

What are ExtraHop Reveal(x)'s Key Features?

Seamless Integration: Collaborates with CrowdStrike for enhanced threat detection.
Network Visibility: Offers comprehensive insights into network activities.
Real-Time Packet Inspection: Monitors and analyzes traffic in real-time.
SSL Traffic Decryption: Ensures visibility into encrypted communications.
Machine Learning Analysis: Utilizes ML for behavioral pattern recognition.

What Benefits Should Be Considered When Evaluating ExtraHop Reveal(x)?

Enhanced Security: Improves threat detection and response capabilities.
Advanced Analytics: Provides in-depth analysis of network behavior.
Cloud-Based Management: Simplifies administration and scalability.
Ease of Use: Offers user-friendly, customizable dashboards.
Comprehensive Visibility: Delivers detailed insights into attack chains and compliance monitoring.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) is employed across industries for network traffic monitoring, malware detection, and real-time analysis. Analysts use it for server-to-server networking insights and application troubleshooting. Companies leverage its capabilities for behavioral analytics and compliance monitoring without deploying sensors on individual devices.

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia

Wood County Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Darktrace, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.