Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs ExtremeCloud IQ comparison

Cisco and Extreme Networks are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Cisco is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while Extreme Networks is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0. Cisco holds a 3.1% mindshare in ID, compared to Extreme Networks’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Extreme Networks users who would recommend it.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Read 20 Cisco Sourcefire SNORT reviews

1,284 Views
1,104 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ExtremeCloud IQ

Read 77 ExtremeCloud IQ reviews

3,064 Views
306 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

ExtremeCloud IQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and ExtremeCloud IQ compete in the network security space. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT appears to have the upper hand in robust security features, while ExtremeCloud IQ leads in ease of use and integration capabilities.

Features: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT offers advanced intrusion detection, open-source flexibility, and real-time threat management. ExtremeCloud IQ provides seamless network management, intuitive configuration, and easy scalability.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT could improve with a more user-friendly setup, enhanced customer support, and simplified deployment processes. ExtremeCloud IQ can benefit from cost reduction, more robust security features, and better integration with third-party services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT requires a technical setup with expertise for effective deployment, with reliable customer support requiring technical knowledge. ExtremeCloud IQ provides streamlined cloud-based deployment with user-friendly configuration and responsive support, reducing setup complexity and simplifying maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is cost-effective due to its open-source nature, offering high long-term ROI for security customization. ExtremeCloud IQ has a higher upfront cost, delivering substantial ROI through enhanced network management and operational efficiencies, justifying the initial investment with comprehensive features and reduced resource expenditure over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,260 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ExtremeCloud IQ

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (14th), Network Access Control (NAC) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is 3.1%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtremeCloud IQ is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT	3.1%
ExtremeCloud IQ	0.9%
Other	96.0%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772102

Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Logging and customizable rules have helped improve threat monitoring and detection

The logging is mainly what I consider one of the best features with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. Being able to log and store it in a file allows you to push it to a centralized repository. The logging and reporting help improve incident response. You should always be logging threats, any sort of misconfiguration, and anything that could be an issue. It's important to at least log and monitor it. The basic rules provide a good baseline in assessing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT's ability in providing real-time analytics for threat detection, but as a professional, you should look to constantly modify that baseline. They provide extensive customizability so you can define your own rules. The customizability allows it to be adaptable in protecting against diverse network threats to the constant change.

Read full review

Ufuk KINDAP

Technical Coordinator at Yildiz Technical University

Cloud-based deployment eases IT workload and supports network management

I struggled with the documentation. I expected comprehensive documentation and videos but found them to be too simple. I needed deep details and more thorough resources. Although there were costly courses available, the lack of budget was a hindrance. Improving documentation with more detailed videos and resources would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco technical support is unbeatable. It offers a premium service every time."

"It is quite an intelligent product."

"Solid intrusion detection and prevention that scales easily in very large environments."

"The logging is mainly what I consider one of the best features with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT; being able to log and store it in a file allows you to push it to a centralized repository."

"Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is easy to configure and the reporting is great. It's also very user-friendly."

"The solution can be integrated with some network electors like Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco ISE, and Active Directory to provide the client with authentication certificates."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically learn the traffic in our environment, and change the merit recommendations based on that."

"The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT pros

"a true controller-less approach, where each Access Point is 100% independent from the management system."

"This solution's most valuable feature is its short deployment time."

"What our customers like the most is that this device is so rugged. It has very good performance and throughput. Its console is very easy to use and has many features, which makes it different from its competitors. Cloud IQ has all the features built into the console, whereas other solutions require you to integrate multiple solutions with their consoles. You don't need to add anything extra with Cloud IQ. With this single solution, you can do almost everything."

"It excels in Wi-Fi and switch management, as well as other internal management aspects, offering speed and efficiency that surpass what other competitors provide."

"The cloud-based management interface allows us to fully manage all our wireless radios, ensuring consistency and ease of access."

"Its configuration and deployment are the most valuable."

"The few times we have needed help, Aerohive has been there for us and I am confident that If I need them they will be there again."

"Whenever I have a concern, question, or just need a refresher the helpful staff at AeroHive is there to help me. By far, the ]best relationship I have ever had with a vendor."

More ExtremeCloud IQ pros

Cons

"The customization of the rules can be simplified."

"Performance needs improvement."

"The initial setup is a little difficult compared to other products in the market. It depends on the environment. If we are doing any migration, it might take months in a brown-field environment."

"There are problems setting up VPNs for some regions."

"I don't think this solution is a time-based control system, because one cannot filter traffic based on time."

"I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it."

"To be frank, the product is not really stable, although they're working on that. Whenever I go to the technical community with an issue, they will usually say that it is not there yet, but the technical team are working on it. The issues are not insolvable. I think they should just keep working on the product to make sure that the product can become very stable. The technical support is great. I appreciate that. We have a lot of communities supporting Firepower now, so you can find help for whatever issue you have."

"While the alerts they offer are good, it could improve it in the sense that they should be more detailed to make the alerts more useful to us in general. Sometimes the solution will offer up false positives. Due to the fact that the alerts aren't detailed, we have to go dig around to see why is it being blocked. The solution would be infinitely better if there was just a bit more detail in the alert information and logging we receive."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT cons

"The certification costs from suppliers are getting out of control, and it's not just Extreme. We have the same problem with Cisco and Huawei."

"The Virtual Appliance crashed once while doing an upgrade. The good thing here is, even if the management system fails, all our networks and features still remain 100% stable and working."

"We have had some mediocre to poor experiences with tech support: Conflicting information, condescending attitudes, and reluctance to work to resolve an issue."

"Having a wizard for customers who are just starting might be helpful."

"The solution will show us that there are some issues, but when we try to find those issues, we can't see them."

"The tool has simplified things, but it also adds a complexity that sometimes stumps some users."

"I would like to see a remote phone application for monitoring APs when on the road."

"ExtremeCloud IQ’s user interface needs to be improved, and its current bugs need to be fixed."

More ExtremeCloud IQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."

"Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."

"I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."

"We have a three-year license for this solution."

"If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five."

"I did a multi-year license. It was a three-year license. It compares well with others in terms of the price. It is about a hundred dollars per year on a three-year scale."

"ExtremeCloud IQ's pricing is medium, but its support contract costs more."

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"Previously, ExtremeCloudIQ provided free licensing for all the basic requirements of their customers. An advanced cloud user had to purchase advanced licenses for automation and advanced country features at the enterprise level. They have restricted the licensing, allowing only up to ten units for testing, which is challenging. This limitation becomes problematic, especially in countries like Sri Lanka or other Asian countries, where customers face economic challenges and have limited budgets. The previous free option was beneficial, but it has become tougher to manage with these new changes. They should revise their pricing structure, offering the basic features free of charge for up to 50 AP. Larger entities with more than 50 APs have the budget to support them. Still, it becomes more difficult for small and medium-sized businesses with less than 50 APs to allocate a significant budget for control and management features."

"Extreme licensing is based on the number of access points. When you buy the license for the first year, everything is included, such as access to mapping, etc. If you don't renew your software assurance for the second year, the access points will still work, but you can't use the cloud management tools."

"Customers need to pay a yearly licensing fee for ExtremeCloud IQ, which is a little bit expensive."

"It is easy for customers to use this product because they are able to interchange the license depending on their usage rather than having to buy individual licenses for each asset."

"There are probably cheaper solutions but we invest for stability and performance for the longer haul."

More ExtremeCloud IQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five. There are some other tools in the market that are more expensive than Cisco. There are no additional c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

I have not had much experience with the community-driven rule set while utilizing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. I don't have experience with recognizing zero-day vulnerabilities, but based on my knowledg...

See all answers

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ExtremeCloud IQ?

The licensing was a challenge due to budget constraints, and I used ExtremeCloud IQ without a license for a period. The documentation and training courses were also costly, impacting how easily I c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtremeCloud IQ?

I use ExtremeCloud IQ's real-time analytics. In the cloud solution, I get reports, and it works together with machine learning and artificial intelligence for those reports. This tool permits the c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 15% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 10% of the time

Darktrace vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 7% of the time

Zscaler Cloud IPS vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 6% of the time

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Competitors

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 9% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 8% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 5% of the time

More ExtremeCloud IQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

February 2026

Download Cisco Sourcefire SNORT product report

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeCloud IQ

February 2026

Download ExtremeCloud IQ product report

Also Known As

Sourcefire SNORT

Aerohive Networks, Aerohive HiveManager, HiveManager, ExtremeCloud , ExtremeSecurity

Overview

Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.

Cisco

ExtremeCloud is a resilient and scalable cloud-based network management solution offered by Extreme Networks as a subscription service.

The network is your platform of engagement for clients and staff. We have designed ExtremeCloud to provide superior user experience by empowering you and the applications that drive your business. The combination of Extreme Networks’ smart wired and wireless edges and the elasticity, resilience and scalability provided via state-of-the-art datacenters distributed strategically for worldwide availability allows you to respond to the changing needs of your business, at the speed of cloud, through a simple, multi-site aware user interface.

Extreme Networks

Sample Customers

CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia

Henry Ford Health System, Baltimore Ravens, Brandili, Federal University of Alagoas, CEDAE, Caxias do Sul, UNISC Concurrency, CenturyLink Field, Louisiana College, Cricket Tasmania Stadium, Moscow Internet Exchange

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ

February 2026

Free Report: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.