Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs ExtremeCloud IQ comparison

Cisco and Extreme Networks are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Cisco is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while Extreme Networks is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0. Cisco holds a 3.1% mindshare in ID, compared to Extreme Networks’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Extreme Networks users who would recommend it.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Read 20 Cisco Sourcefire SNORT reviews

1,284 Views
1,104 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ExtremeCloud IQ

Read 77 ExtremeCloud IQ reviews

3,064 Views
306 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

ExtremeCloud IQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and ExtremeCloud IQ compete in the network security space. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT appears to have the upper hand in robust security features, while ExtremeCloud IQ leads in ease of use and integration capabilities.

Features: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT offers advanced intrusion detection, open-source flexibility, and real-time threat management. ExtremeCloud IQ provides seamless network management, intuitive configuration, and easy scalability.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT could improve with a more user-friendly setup, enhanced customer support, and simplified deployment processes. ExtremeCloud IQ can benefit from cost reduction, more robust security features, and better integration with third-party services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT requires a technical setup with expertise for effective deployment, with reliable customer support requiring technical knowledge. ExtremeCloud IQ provides streamlined cloud-based deployment with user-friendly configuration and responsive support, reducing setup complexity and simplifying maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is cost-effective due to its open-source nature, offering high long-term ROI for security customization. ExtremeCloud IQ has a higher upfront cost, delivering substantial ROI through enhanced network management and operational efficiencies, justifying the initial investment with comprehensive features and reduced resource expenditure over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,886 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ExtremeCloud IQ

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (14th), Network Access Control (NAC) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is 3.1%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtremeCloud IQ is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT	3.1%
ExtremeCloud IQ	0.9%
Other	96.0%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772102

Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Logging and customizable rules have helped improve threat monitoring and detection

The logging is mainly what I consider one of the best features with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. Being able to log and store it in a file allows you to push it to a centralized repository. The logging and reporting help improve incident response. You should always be logging threats, any sort of misconfiguration, and anything that could be an issue. It's important to at least log and monitor it. The basic rules provide a good baseline in assessing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT's ability in providing real-time analytics for threat detection, but as a professional, you should look to constantly modify that baseline. They provide extensive customizability so you can define your own rules. The customizability allows it to be adaptable in protecting against diverse network threats to the constant change.

Read full review

Ufuk KINDAP

Technical Coordinator at Yildiz Technical University

Cloud-based deployment eases IT workload and supports network management

I struggled with the documentation. I expected comprehensive documentation and videos but found them to be too simple. I needed deep details and more thorough resources. Although there were costly courses available, the lack of budget was a hindrance. Improving documentation with more detailed videos and resources would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco technical support is unbeatable. It offers a premium service every time."

"It has a huge rate of protection. It's has a low level of positives and a huge rate of threat protection. It's easy to deploy and easy to implement. It has an incredible price rate compared to similar solutions."

"In general, the features are all great. However, if I need to take hardware for ASA, because they need to upgrade to Firepower, we want to create rules. For that, most of the time we go to the command line. Right now Firepower is working really hard on the grid. You can apply all those rules to the grid. Even if you want to monitor the logs, for example, the activity will tell you which particular user has been blocked because of that rule. Firepower's monitoring interface is very good, because you can see each and every piece. ASA also had it, but there you needed to type the command and be under the server to see all that stuff. In Firepower you have the possibility to go directly to the firewall. The way the monitoring is displayed is also very nice. The feature I appreciate most in Firepower is actually the grid. The grid has worked very well."

"The solution can be integrated with some network electors like Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco ISE, and Active Directory to provide the client with authentication certificates."

"The most valuable feature is the visibility that we have across the virtual environment."

"It simplifies the configuration process by offering pre-defined base configurations, including security and connectivity settings."

"I like most of Cisco's features, like malware detection and URL filtering."

"The solution is rather easy to use."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT pros

"When we deployed the new IP that is managed wirelessly in the cloud, it fixed the problems. Now, we don't have any more reports, and everything works fine."

"The few times we have needed help, Aerohive has been there for us and I am confident that If I need them they will be there again."

"ExtremeCloud IQ helps with monitoring networking at low costs, acting as a controller in a cloud environment, eliminating the need for an appliance controller or wireless LAN controller, thus saving on investment and reducing TCO costs."

"The most valuable feature is the centralized management capability."

"The deployment made my life very easy."

"Integrated Firewall in every AP (with DPI inspection) is a killer feature and it is included already in the price of licence (with others, this feature is an add-on licence)."

"Its configuration and deployment are the most valuable."

"It allows me to see APs and clients that are having issues, allowing for faster support response and less downtime."

More ExtremeCloud IQ pros

Cons

"I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it."

"If the price is brought down then everybody will be happy."

"While the alerts they offer are good, it could improve it in the sense that they should be more detailed to make the alerts more useful to us in general. Sometimes the solution will offer up false positives. Due to the fact that the alerts aren't detailed, we have to go dig around to see why is it being blocked. The solution would be infinitely better if there was just a bit more detail in the alert information and logging we receive."

"Integration with other components — even Cisco's own products — can be enhanced to improve administrative experience."

"The implementation could be a bit easier."

"The main dashboard of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT could improve."

"I don't think this solution is a time-based control system, because one cannot filter traffic based on time."

"The pricing needs to be improved. We have lots of low-budget clients around us. Budget constraints are always a deterrent in our market."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT cons

"The product could support multi-vendor infrastructures."

"I would like to see a remote phone application for monitoring APs when on the road."

"Its price could be lower. It is a simplified solution, but it has price challenges. It is costly as compared to other solutions. It has almost everything. The only thing is that MAC is not possible on the cloud, and it has to be on-premises."

"Pricing is a bit expensive."

"A mobile app would be awesome."

"They can improve just the onboarding process. More user information about the introduction to the product would be helpful. It would be good if they have a better user introduction to the new product because it is different than the prior version."

"ExtremeCloud should invest in an SD-WAN solution or integration with SD-WAN."

"For me, the only issue is the potential delay in the tool statistics updating in real time after making changes."

More ExtremeCloud IQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."

"We have a three-year license for this solution."

"If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five."

"I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."

"Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."

"I would advise that you be sure to compare apples with apples. Many customers just look at the price per AP and licences, and compare that against other solutions. But, they do not look at the complete picture such as: TCO - how much the equipment will cost you over, say, seven years? Will the customer need to change complete infrastructure when they want to buy the newest hardware? Does support include a lifetime warranty and RMA?"

"Previously, ExtremeCloudIQ provided free licensing for all the basic requirements of their customers. An advanced cloud user had to purchase advanced licenses for automation and advanced country features at the enterprise level. They have restricted the licensing, allowing only up to ten units for testing, which is challenging. This limitation becomes problematic, especially in countries like Sri Lanka or other Asian countries, where customers face economic challenges and have limited budgets. The previous free option was beneficial, but it has become tougher to manage with these new changes. They should revise their pricing structure, offering the basic features free of charge for up to 50 AP. Larger entities with more than 50 APs have the budget to support them. Still, it becomes more difficult for small and medium-sized businesses with less than 50 APs to allocate a significant budget for control and management features."

"It is not the cheapest product but I think that the price is reasonable because you get a lot of support of it's needed."

"I did a multi-year license. It was a three-year license. It compares well with others in terms of the price. It is about a hundred dollars per year on a three-year scale."

"Although the pricing is a bit high, I consider Aerohive to be well worth the money."

"The price was okay."

"It is easy for customers to use this product because they are able to interchange the license depending on their usage rather than having to buy individual licenses for each asset."

"Customers need to pay a yearly licensing fee for ExtremeCloud IQ, which is a little bit expensive."

More ExtremeCloud IQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five. There are some other tools in the market that are more expensive than Cisco. There are no additional c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

I have not had much experience with the community-driven rule set while utilizing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. I don't have experience with recognizing zero-day vulnerabilities, but based on my knowledg...

See all answers

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ExtremeCloud IQ?

The licensing was a challenge due to budget constraints, and I used ExtremeCloud IQ without a license for a period. The documentation and training courses were also costly, impacting how easily I c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtremeCloud IQ?

I use ExtremeCloud IQ's real-time analytics. In the cloud solution, I get reports, and it works together with machine learning and artificial intelligence for those reports. This tool permits the c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 15% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 10% of the time

Darktrace vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 7% of the time

TrendAI Tipping Point vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 6% of the time

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Competitors

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 9% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 4% of the time

More ExtremeCloud IQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

February 2026

Download Cisco Sourcefire SNORT product report

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeCloud IQ

February 2026

Download ExtremeCloud IQ product report

Also Known As

Sourcefire SNORT

Aerohive Networks, Aerohive HiveManager, HiveManager, ExtremeCloud , ExtremeSecurity

Overview

Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.

Cisco

ExtremeCloud is a resilient and scalable cloud-based network management solution offered by Extreme Networks as a subscription service.

The network is your platform of engagement for clients and staff. We have designed ExtremeCloud to provide superior user experience by empowering you and the applications that drive your business. The combination of Extreme Networks’ smart wired and wireless edges and the elasticity, resilience and scalability provided via state-of-the-art datacenters distributed strategically for worldwide availability allows you to respond to the changing needs of your business, at the speed of cloud, through a simple, multi-site aware user interface.

Extreme Networks

Sample Customers

CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia

Henry Ford Health System, Baltimore Ravens, Brandili, Federal University of Alagoas, CEDAE, Caxias do Sul, UNISC Concurrency, CenturyLink Field, Louisiana College, Cricket Tasmania Stadium, Moscow Internet Exchange

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ

February 2026

Free Report: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.