


Symantec Proxy and Cisco Web Security Appliance compete in the web traffic security space. While both offer strong capabilities, Symantec Proxy's comprehensive URL filtering and threat detection seem to give it an edge, whereas Cisco's strength lies in its integration with other Cisco products.
Features: Symantec Proxy provides comprehensive URL filtering, robust caching capabilities, and strong integration tools like FireGlass. Its stability and Global Intelligence Network enhance threat detection. Cisco Web Security Appliance features precise content filtering, policy framing, and effective anti-malware and DNS security integration. It is known for seamless integration with other Cisco products, enhancing its utility.
Room for Improvement: Symantec Proxy requires more intuitive documentation and improved integration with dashboards. Its deployment procedures could be more efficient. Cisco Web Security Appliance's complexity and fragmented features prompt a need for simplification. Both support from Symantec has declined post-Broadcom, and Cisco requires better GUI-based troubleshooting and streamlined reporting. Symantec faces criticism regarding pricing and support, while Cisco needs a unified solution.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Proxy typically deploys on-premises but offers some cloud and hybrid options. Cisco Web Security Appliance provides more flexible deployment, including private cloud options. Symantec's technical support has seen mixed reviews, particularly after the Broadcom acquisition. Cisco, while reliable, faces criticisms for responsiveness and lack of graphical troubleshooting, although its integration into existing Cisco setups is smooth.
Pricing and ROI: Pricing for both Symantec Proxy and Cisco Web Security Appliance is considered high. Symantec suffers from complex licensing post-Broadcom, presenting a challenge for calculating ROI, especially for smaller businesses. Cisco is also costly, noted for complex licensing, yet some argue its feature set may justify the cost. Both solutions are deemed valuable for larger enterprises but may not meet the ROI expectations for smaller companies due to pricing.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| iboss | 2.4% |
| Cisco Web Security Appliance | 2.3% |
| Symantec Proxy | 1.9% |
| Other | 93.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.
Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.
What are the most important features of Iboss?The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.
Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) is a web security solution provided by Cisco Systems. It is designed to protect organizations from web-based threats, enforce acceptable use policies, and provide secure access to the internet for users within the organization.
Cisco Web Security Appliance Benefits:
Cisco Web Security Appliance Features:
Cisco Web Security Appliance is typically deployed as a physical or virtual appliance within an organization's network infrastructure. It can be integrated with other Cisco security products and solutions to provide a layered approach to web security and network protection.
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Cisco Web Security Appliance users.
Md Manirul Islam, Deputy General Manager Pre-Sales at Beximcocomputers, states that "The most valuable feature of Cisco Web Security Appliance is the provided anti-malware functionality and URL categorization. I can block access to malicious websites. 99 percent of the cases are related to a malicious website. If I cannot browse those malicious websites, then we are 99 percent protected."
Surendar Ganesan, Technical Lead, writes that "The best feature of Cisco Web Security Appliance is its policy framing. It also has a good UI and it can handle traffic well. Cisco Web Security Appliance is a good product."
Atdhe Zyhranaj, Network Security Consultant at NSCON Network Services & Consulting GmbH, says that Cisco Web Security Appliance is "Easy to set up with scalable virtual machines and good reliability."
Symantec Proxy is designed to provide web security, web access control, and secure web gateway functionalities for organizations. It helps protect against web-based threats, enforce web usage policies, and provide secure access to internet resources.
Symantec Proxy Benefits:
Symantec Proxy Features:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Symantec Proxy users.
PeerSpot user, Consultant at a financial services firm, says that Symantec Proxy "...enables us to manage bandwidth for users based on their privilege levels. For example, if a user wants to use a certain application or resource, we can provide access based on their privileges."
PeerSpot user, General Manager & founder at a engineering company, writes that Symantec Proxy has "A complex deployment, no proper user reporting, and a proxy component that works."
Muhammad Salahuddin, Unit Head - Network and Security Solutions at FPM Solutions, states that Symantec Proxy has "Good URL filtering but is expensive and doesn't have good technical support services."
We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.