

Cloudability and Harness offer competing cloud cost management solutions, each with unique strengths. Harness is perceived as the leader due to its innovative features and long-term value despite Cloudability's strong financial analysis capabilities and pricing benefits.
Features: Cloudability provides extensive cost transparency, predictive analytics, and detailed budgeting tools. Harness delivers robust continuous integration and delivery, integrating cost management with DevOps for end-to-end automation support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudability features a straightforward deployment process focused on financial teams, integrating well with financial tools. Harness offers a comprehensive CI/CD deployment model, slightly more complex but ideal for DevOps. Its proactive support ensures smooth operations with personalized assistance, appealing to tech buyers.
Pricing and ROI: Cloudability is more accessible due to competitive pricing, offering cost-effective upfront solutions. However, while Harness may involve higher setup costs, it provides superior ROI with its integrated automation, resulting in long-term savings and enhanced productivity.
It'd be very easy to save at least 10 to 20% costs from cloud spend just by utilizing the features of right-sizing or commitments management that Cloudability offers.
We save time by making the reporting easier.
By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.
Time is saved because we now save engineering time. Before, it required two to three engineers actively monitoring production during deployments, but after starting to use Harness, there is zero or minimal manual monitoring.
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
The customer support from Cloudability is great.
Cloudability's customer support is adequate, and I would rate it an 8 on a scale of 1 to 10.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Harness customer support is really helpful anytime I try to reach out; they are available to assist with any issues I am facing.
We have been receiving incident reports whenever an incident occurs on Harness, and they are usually quick to respond.
Cloudability's scalability is excellent because it can link with as few as one cloud account to thousands of cloud accounts, so there are no issues there.
Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.
It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.
When I integrated Harness to more than 20 applications in one place, it becomes less stable.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Harness is decently stable.
I've found that Groups is basically unusable because if it can't be used everywhere, you would have to run both group-based access control and direct user-based access control at the same time, which doesn't make any sense.
I believe that automating all manual processes in Cloudability would be beneficial, providing a proactive prescriptive analysis on what needs to be done to lower costs.
It would be beneficial if we could use resource tags to provide more fine-grained visibility.
There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code.
An improvement idea is better guided onboarding with more opinionated defaults and examples.
Previously, when deploying a version that had been deployed successfully before, it sometimes failed upon trying again, which seems to be an intermittent issue about stability.
Compared to the rest of the industry, they may be a little more expensive than some other FinOps tools.
From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.
The forecasting feature has helped me understand how the resources are utilized and how the cost is burned, and then I use it to make changes to keep the cost in control.
The Views feature is also beneficial because lots of teams may use Cloudability within an organization, allowing users to segregate data to particular Views so they are only looking at what's relevant to them.
I find the reports to be extensive and elaborate, and I get whatever information I require.
Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.
Meantime to recovery (MTTR) improved from 30 to 60 minutes before Harness to 5 to 10 minutes now.
The best features in Harness are its user-friendliness and setup configuration.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cloudability | 7.1% |
| Harness | 1.9% |
| Other | 91.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Cloudability is a financial management tool for monitoring and analyzing every cloud expense across any organization. It brings transparency to how and where organizations spend money on cloud resources, giving them the power to reap the most value from cloud usage possible. It aggregates expenditures into accessible and comprehensive reports, helps identify new opportunities for reducing spend and increasing cloud efficiency, offers budget alerts and recommendations via SMS and email, provides APIs for connecting cloud billing and usage data to any business or financial system, and more.
Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.