Cloudability and Harness offer competing cloud cost management solutions, each with unique strengths. Harness is perceived as the leader due to its innovative features and long-term value despite Cloudability's strong financial analysis capabilities and pricing benefits.
Features: Cloudability provides extensive cost transparency, predictive analytics, and detailed budgeting tools. Harness delivers robust continuous integration and delivery, integrating cost management with DevOps for end-to-end automation support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudability features a straightforward deployment process focused on financial teams, integrating well with financial tools. Harness offers a comprehensive CI/CD deployment model, slightly more complex but ideal for DevOps. Its proactive support ensures smooth operations with personalized assistance, appealing to tech buyers.
Pricing and ROI: Cloudability is more accessible due to competitive pricing, offering cost-effective upfront solutions. However, while Harness may involve higher setup costs, it provides superior ROI with its integrated automation, resulting in long-term savings and enhanced productivity.
We save time by making the reporting easier.
Time is saved because we now save engineering time. Before, it required two to three engineers actively monitoring production during deployments, but after starting to use Harness, there is zero or minimal manual monitoring.
By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
Cloudability's customer support is adequate, and I would rate it an 8 on a scale of 1 to 10.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Harness customer support is really helpful anytime I try to reach out; they are available to assist with any issues I am facing.
We have been receiving incident reports whenever an incident occurs on Harness, and they are usually quick to respond.
Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.
It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.
When I integrated Harness to more than 20 applications in one place, it becomes less stable.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Harness is decently stable.
I believe that automating all manual processes in Cloudability would be beneficial, providing a proactive prescriptive analysis on what needs to be done to lower costs.
It would be beneficial if we could use resource tags to provide more fine-grained visibility.
There is no way to execute nested pipelines, which means that we cannot execute child pipelines within child pipelines and child pipelines even within those child pipelines.
Flexible pricing models and more essential features in lower tiers could address this issue.
Harness setup and configurations could be made easier to configure, which would be helpful.
From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.
The forecasting feature has helped me understand how the resources are utilized and how the cost is burned, and then I use it to make changes to keep the cost in control.
I find the reports to be extensive and elaborate, and I get whatever information I require.
Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.
Meantime to recovery (MTTR) improved from 30 to 60 minutes before Harness to 5 to 10 minutes now.
The best features in Harness are its user-friendliness and setup configuration.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cloudability | 7.1% |
| Harness | 1.9% |
| Other | 91.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Cloudability is a financial management tool for monitoring and analyzing every cloud expense across any organization. It brings transparency to how and where organizations spend money on cloud resources, giving them the power to reap the most value from cloud usage possible. It aggregates expenditures into accessible and comprehensive reports, helps identify new opportunities for reducing spend and increasing cloud efficiency, offers budget alerts and recommendations via SMS and email, provides APIs for connecting cloud billing and usage data to any business or financial system, and more.
Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
