Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response comparison

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download the complete report

Helped 848,989 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

40th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

CHATHURANGA-JAYAWEEEA

Product Security at Plexus Global (Pvt) Ltd

Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection

I also have experience with Sophos and Kaspersky. The main difference is that some features are not available in Kaspersky. And, for example, the patch management part is not included in Sophos. On the Kaspersky side, they have a patch management part. However, we need to purchase an additional option to enable that feature. With Comodo Protection, patch management is already included with the product, and we don't need to buy it separately. Also, the main advantage is performance. When we implemented Sophos on the endpoint, the CPU utilization went higher. When we installed Comodo, the memory of the CPU utilization is very low. We can implement Comodo from XP and SP3 to the latest operating system. However, with Kaspersky or Sophos, they are not supported for that or Windows 10. Comodo is supporting Windows XP SP3 and all our operating systems. That said, the Sophos Intercept X Advanced option has a web filtering part, or integration. Comodo has only basic filtering, and web filtering is there. That means we can do the URL web addresses and block and allow the connection and that's it with Comodo. Comodo does have a separate product for that, Comodo Secure Internet, where we can configure and filter all the web filtering parts. That would be an extra solution at an extra cost.

Read full review

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection allows our organization's clients to be managed and inventoried remotely."

"It's user-friendly, compatible, and accessible."

"The big advantage is that it has a sandbox if something bad comes into it."

"Auto Containment is a valuable feature."

"It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful."

"The most valuable feature of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is its ability to provide ransomware protection."

"It's stable and reliable."

"If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pros

"Immediately we can pick up the computers in the network if any malicious operation that is triggered."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform."

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

"They do a very good job of providing multi-stage visualizations of malicious operations that immediately show all attack details across all devices and users. Since it is MalOp-centric model, you can see if there has been a similar operation across multiple machines. If it is the same thing appearing on multiple machines, you see all the machines and users affected in one screen."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

Cons

"The locking and backup capabilities of the solution can be improved."

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows."

"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."

"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."

"The quality of the analysis and the product dashboard is a bit low compared to other providers."

"They need to enhance the performance of the agents. Currently, the performance is going low when the agent starts a full scan. The agent is consuming a lot of resources while scanning. When there are a lot of documents to check, it slows down the endpoint. This is the only thing that worries me about Comodo, but this issue is also there in other products. It is missing DLP, and I know that they are working on adding some data loss prevention capabilities. They have added some capabilities, but these capabilities are not yet mature. I hope they will enhance these capabilities because it is important to prevent the data from going out from inside. We are protected from the outside, but we also have to be protected from the inside out."

"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."

"There are a few minor issues such as package updates and passwords."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection cons

"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

"I feel it is a shame that I cannot create groups of groups with inheritance."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

"The product's reporting isn't great."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The product can be considered fairly cheap."

"I rate Comodo’s pricing a four out of ten."

"It's a cost-effective solution"

"It was about 35 or 40 bucks per year for the endpoint."

"Generally, the cost is between $16 and $19 per endpoint."

"The tool's pricing is not very expensive and falls within the market price. The solution's licensing is on a yearly basis."

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is inexpensive."

"The product is pricey."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"The pricing is manageable."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Auto Containment is a valuable feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.

What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows. There is also room for improvement in ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Comparisons

Compared 23% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 14% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Competitors

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 27% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Product Reports

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection product report

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Also Known As

Comodo AEP

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

Overview

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

Xcitium

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Sample Customers

Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response