Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Trellix Endpoint Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.5
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection improved security, reduced malware, streamlined IT operations, enhanced threat detection, and increased productivity for users.
Sentiment score
9.2
Trellix Endpoint Security delivers strong ROI, cost savings, and effective protection, especially for firms with smaller security teams.
We have observed tremendous return on investment after implementing Trellix Endpoint Security as it is a more cost-effective solution compared to other products.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection support is generally efficient and helpful, with high satisfaction despite occasional delays.
Sentiment score
7.7
Trellix Endpoint Security's customer service is praised for skill and responsiveness, yet varies in regional consistency and escalation processes.
Customer support is generally satisfactory but could be improved, especially in terms of response time.
I would rate their customer service nine out of ten.
The response time is a notable issue.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is highly scalable, ideal for small to medium businesses, with challenges for larger enterprises.
Sentiment score
7.7
Trellix Endpoint Security efficiently scales for organizations globally, receiving high ratings for flexibility and ease in diverse environments.
I would rate the scalability of the solution as a six out of ten, indicating some challenges due to downtime requirements.
Trellix Endpoint Security is scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is highly rated for stability and consistent performance, making it a favored security choice.
Sentiment score
8.2
Trellix Endpoint Security is stable, reliable, and efficient, though performance may vary with outdated versions or resource constraints.
The stability of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated at ninety-five to ninety-seven percent.
I would rate its stability as nine out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection needs clearer communications, improved features, faster support, and enhanced resource efficiency and infrastructure.
Trellix Endpoint Security needs improvements in speed, interface, resource use, technical support, and compatibility with Mac and Linux.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows.
What needs improvement in Trellix Endpoint Security is the reduction of resource consumption by the scanning feature.
Artificial intelligence also requires improvement to further enhance the product.
 

Setup Cost

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection's pricing is competitive yet varied, with differing user views on cost-effectiveness and additional charges.
Trellix Endpoint Security offers flexible licensing with competitive prices, value-for-money, and discounts, appealing to enterprises.
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security is cost-effective and provides excellent value for money.
The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year.
 

Valuable Features

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers strong security with sandboxing, AI threat detection, and seamless integration for efficient management.
Trellix Endpoint Security offers centralized management, advanced threat prevention, and seamless integration providing robust, scalable protection without system performance compromise.
It includes an auto containment feature, ensuring files and folders remain secure.
Trellix Endpoint Security is a proven, robust, and cost-effective solution that protects the organization from different types of ransomware and attacks.
The most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security include its protection capabilities such as DNS and endpoint security, DNS threat prevention, as well as advanced threat prevention.
 

Categories and Ranking

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
39th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
99
Ranking in other categories
Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security is 3.1%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

CHATHURANGA-JAYAWEEEA - PeerSpot reviewer
Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection
I also have experience with Sophos and Kaspersky. The main difference is that some features are not available in Kaspersky. And, for example, the patch management part is not included in Sophos. On the Kaspersky side, they have a patch management part. However, we need to purchase an additional option to enable that feature. With Comodo Protection, patch management is already included with the product, and we don't need to buy it separately. Also, the main advantage is performance. When we implemented Sophos on the endpoint, the CPU utilization went higher. When we installed Comodo, the memory of the CPU utilization is very low. We can implement Comodo from XP and SP3 to the latest operating system. However, with Kaspersky or Sophos, they are not supported for that or Windows 10. Comodo is supporting Windows XP SP3 and all our operating systems. That said, the Sophos Intercept X Advanced option has a web filtering part, or integration. Comodo has only basic filtering, and web filtering is there. That means we can do the URL web addresses and block and allow the connection and that's it with Comodo. Comodo does have a separate product for that, Comodo Secure Internet, where we can configure and filter all the web filtering parts. That would be an extra solution at an extra cost.
AhmedEl-Tayeb - PeerSpot reviewer
Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services
Some of our products have a first and second line owned by us. We are giving support services to the customers instead of the vendor. Some other products are supported directly by the technology vendor, however. Technical support from the vendor is very bad. Usually, when the customer submits a ticket, they put a severity level on the case. Whenever the case is very important, and there is a real malfunction in the product on the customer side, and there is something down that needs someone to have a look immediately, it takes more time than it should to even engage with the customer. When someone has to contact the customer and have a remote session within the customer environment, they sometimes lack in terms of communication with the customer. The support centers are located in the East and not all have an acceptable level of English in order to communicate directly with the customer.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Educational Organization
44%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows. There is also room for improvement in ...
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
Trellix Endpoint Security is cost-effective and provides excellent value for money, with no need for extra expenses for premium support.
 

Also Known As

Comodo AEP
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.