Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Semperis Directory Services Protector comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon
Ranking in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
121
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (3rd), Identity Management (IM) (5th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (1st), Active Directory Management (3rd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Ransomware Protection (1st), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)
Semperis Directory Services...
Ranking in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

DK
May 10, 2024
Proactively blocks threats, provides insights, and integrates seamlessly
We use CrowdStrike Falcon for intrusion prevention management CrowdStrike Falcon proactively blocks threats and provides us with insights. CrowdStrike Falcon integration is seamless. The endpoint and server management are the most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon. CrowdStrike Falcon's…
Use Semperis Directory Services Protector?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing on CrowdStrike is per license. It was about $42 per seat yearly."
"CrowdStrike Falcon is more expensive than other EDR solutions with similar features."
"I am not aware of the price, but I believe that it is among the most expensive XDRs out there. Of course, this is dependent on the features you choose. Depending on the features, the price might increase."
"There are three to four licensing models available to choose from for CrowdStrike Falcon. The price of CrowdStrike Falcon depends on the distributor and the reseller partner. The price we received was good."
"Crowdstrike Falcon is relatively cheap."
"The price of CrowdStrike Falcon is reasonable."
"This solution has a very competitive price."
"It has an annual license, and it is not that expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?
Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...
How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?
The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR). Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.