Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert comparison

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Download the complete report

Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (35th)

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Rodrigo Censi

Technical Support Analyst at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Patch management and integration capabilities drive effective endpoint response management

We work with Kaspersky and two modalities: the Censi final and Censi license. Most of our clients work in financial areas and industry. Our regular enterprise business relies on these solutions Kaspersky is viable with ADR; the Endpoint Detection response feature and the BitLocker management…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We didn't have the visibility that we now have. It has increased our visibility by a lot. So, we put a lot more time into really looking at our environment and what is happening throughout our different networks. It has increased our visibility by around fivefold."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform. It is very straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The solution is efficient."

"The initial setup is not overly complicated."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"It helps improve security in our organization."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is endpoint protection."

"We can scale the solution."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers centralized monitoring where we can monitor everything from a single point. I also like its security and network traffic features."

"Kaspersky is one of the best, and we are working with it today."

"The solution is scalable."

"The product is very easy to use."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert pros

Cons

"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."

"Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"The network coverage becomes an issue most of the time."

"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."

"Compared to our previous endpoint, we have a lot more false positives and a lot more duplication of alerts. So we're chasing more alerts."

"Its Microsoft PowerShell protections still need some compatibility improvements. We have run across just a few. It is compatible with 90% of what we have in our network, but there is that 10% that we are still struggling with as far as compatibility with the type of PowerShell scripts needed to run our day-to-day business."

"There is room for improvement in the product features related to device control, particularly USB management."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"Installing Kaspersky is complex. It requires more work from system admins and takes almost one week to deploy, including integration and mapping with other solutions. You also have to configure Kaspersky EDR sandboxing then set up permissions for various teams and customers."

"The product should release more frequent updates. The tool needs to improve its scalability as well."

"The solution can improve by providing automatic fixing of vulnerabilities and reducing the resources used in the server component and endpoint agent. They are very bulky and use a lot of CPU, memory, and hard drive resources."

"There's room for improvement in customer service and support. The response time when I open a ticket or communicate with the vendor could be faster."

"The issue with Kaspersky EDR is the sandbox. I'd like to have the ability to manage it on the cloud as well."

"It's not a simple implementation."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert needs to include a traffic interface."

"I would like better integration with other products."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"The pricing is manageable."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"Kaspersky is licensed on a yearly basis."

"If one is cheap, ten is expensive, I rate the product’s price as a seven out of ten, especially if I compare it with CrowdStrike."

"The license for EDR costs about 1,000 pesos per user. I would rate the pricing as four out of five."

"The product has a valuable pricing model. We need to purchase its monthly subscription."

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

"The solution isn't the cheapest considering what you get. I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten."

"The pricing is reasonable. Not too cheap, not too expensive."

"The price of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is in the middle range compared to competitors. The pricing model is based on the users using the solutions. The cost for us is approximately 2200 Algerian dinars. The price of the solution could be reduced."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have many virtual machines, and the integration is helpful.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

If one is cheap, ten is expensive, I rate the product’s price as a seven out of ten, especially if I compare it with CrowdStrike.

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The Kaspersky console could be easier to navigate and generate reports from. We've got Stripe in the method of deployment, which makes it easier and requires lower integration from my team. Deploym...

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Comparisons

Compared 27% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 34% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 15% of the time

Cynet vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 8% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 8% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 6% of the time

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Competitors

Product Reports

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert product report

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

Kaspersky EDR

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to detect and respond to advanced threats in real time. It combines advanced threat intelligence, machine learning algorithms, and behavioral analysis to provide proactive protection against sophisticated attacks.

With its centralized management console, security teams can easily monitor and investigate incidents, while automated response capabilities enable quick remediation. This solution offers deep visibility into endpoint activities, allowing organizations to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a powerful tool for enhancing the overall security posture of businesses, ensuring the protection of critical assets and sensitive data.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert