Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud comparison

Cybereason and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Cybereason is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.2, while Kaspersky is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.4. Cybereason holds a 1.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

2,926 Views
1,626 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...

Read 11 Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud reviews

547 Views
391 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud compete in the endpoint security market. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is seen as superior due to its comprehensive features and effectiveness in malware detection, while Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is preferred for its pricing and support.

Features: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is praised for advanced threat detection, automation, and analytics. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud receives high marks for robust malware protection, ease of use, and cloud-based management.

Room for Improvement: Users of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response point out it could benefit from better integration with other tools, improved incident response features, and more detailed alerts. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud users suggest enhancements in reporting, more detailed alerts, and increased customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is generally perceived as having a straightforward deployment process with solid customer support. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is also noted for its easy deployment, with users highlighting its helpful customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response users appreciate the favorable pricing, and the return on investment is frequently mentioned positively. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud users also find the pricing reasonable, often seen as providing good value for its capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (35th)

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

27th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Ransomware Protection (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

AnikIslam

Senior Executive at Lakdhanavi Limited

Automatic update feature could be better and multi-layered protection capability needs enhancement

The platform's ability to update the database from my device and manage user profiles is quite effective. It also provides web threat protection by blocking unwanted websites. It provides multi-layered protection. Although it could be more efficient, it is sufficient for regular purposes. I would not recommend it based on my experience. I rate it a three out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"The initial setup is not overly complicated."

"They do a very good job of providing multi-stage visualizations of malicious operations that immediately show all attack details across all devices and users. Since it is MalOp-centric model, you can see if there has been a similar operation across multiple machines. If it is the same thing appearing on multiple machines, you see all the machines and users affected in one screen."

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."

"For me, the technical support is good."

"Immediately we can pick up the computers in the network if any malicious operation that is triggered."

"Their EDR solution, the ability to mitigate issues through their command line, is probably the best feature that we've had. We use that all the time. It's very useful for doing investigations."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"Kaspersky has a Cloud Discovery feature. There is no template in Kaspersky. They provide a temporary risk assessment of the cloud services. For example, if we want to block public storage services like OneDrive or Google Drive, we need to specify each individually. The main difference is that Kaspersky's process takes more time because it requires individual input."

"We had the cloud suite of KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud, and its monitoring was fine."

"I find the EDR service valuable as it adds extra protection and provides a centralized view."

"The most valuable component of the solution is the malware detection feature."

"The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization."

"The standout features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud include its cloud-based console and the simplicity of managing endpoints."

"The platform's ability to update the database from my device and manage user profiles is quite effective."

"In Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, anti-phishing and anti-malware are two very powerful aspects."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud pros

Cons

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."

"Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality."

"It initially took some time to deploy."

"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."

"I feel it is a shame that I cannot create groups of groups with inheritance."

"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

"They need to improve their technical support services."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"While the product provides a good level of protection, we need better support, especially in terms of being kept informed about new threats and specific configurations needed."

"It requires specific expertise or certified professionals to deploy the product. There is a need to expand the offerings to various industries covering different-sized businesses."

"Kaspersky doesn't provide local support."

"Its high CPU usage also slows down devices, particularly those with lower specifications like Core i3."

"The solution’s stability could be improved because we earlier faced an issue where the solution was not detecting file-less malware."

"The tool's update management can be better. In future releases, the addition of a DLP module would be valuable."

"One area where the product could be improved is in its delivery and installation process."

"Kaspersky's global ranking has been on the decline."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is manageable."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"The product’s price is flexible."

"I find Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud more accessible in terms of pricing."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The product is averagely priced."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is a cost-effective solution."

"The solution is moderately priced and cannot be considered an expensive or cheap tool."

"We had to pay an annual licensing fee for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud."

"The platform is expensive."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What do you like most about KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

The product is a bit expensive and requires extensive price negotiation with local vendors. Comparable to market pricing, good products generally have similar pricing levels.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

While the product provides a good level of protection, we need better support, especially in terms of being kept informed about new threats and specific configurations needed. The quality of suppor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 27% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

April 2025

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud report

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

No data available

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

All you need to protect Windows desktops and file servers, Mac OS devices, iOS and Android mobiles and even Microsoft Oﬀice 365.

Just sign up for an account instead of getting tied up in hardware and software provisioning.

Pre-defined policies are automatically applied to each newly connected device, delivering immediate protection.

Be anywhere and protect anywhere using a cloud-based console.

Secure geographically separated oﬀices, home or field-based workers, at their desks or on the go regardless of device type.

Enable remote encryption to make sure your corporate data is safe, even if a device gets lost or stolen.

Shadow IT discovery manages uncontrolled sharing of corporate data in the cloud and reveals users wasting time on social media and messengers.

Ensure compliance readiness with a Data Discovery audit of your personal and financial data in the cloud.

Enable safe collaboration and communication in Microsoft Oﬀice 365 - protection for all its major apps is already included in the Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Plus and Pro tiers.

Root Cause Analysis provides an attack visualization so you can see the cause and path of an attack.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) provides simple investigation tools an effortless response to evasive threats.

Advance your skills with online cybersecurity training included in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pro.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.