Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs N-able EDR comparison

Cybereason and N-able are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Cybereason is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.2, while N-able is ranked #55 with an average rating of 7.0. Cybereason holds a 1.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to N-able’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

2,926 Views
1,626 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

Read 3 N-able EDR reviews

710 Views
548 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

N-able EDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and N-able EDR cater to businesses seeking robust security solutions. Users generally prefer Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response for its advanced features and functionality, while N-able EDR is favored for its competitive pricing and excellent customer support.

Features: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is known for its advanced threat detection, intuitive navigation, and integration capabilities. N-able EDR offers strong threat detection, comprehensive reporting tools, and incident response capabilities.

Room for Improvement: For Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response, better scalability, additional customization options, and faster response times are desired. N-able EDR users seek improvements in the alert system, faster response times, and more scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has straightforward deployment, although customer service is considered average. N-able EDR is praised for its easy deployment and superior customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers good ROI but has high initial setup costs. N-able EDR is valued for cost-effectiveness and attractive pricing, delivering significant ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. N-able EDR Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. N-able EDR

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (35th)

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

55th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Yazan Albaw

Customer Success Director at We Cybers

N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.

N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Immediately we can pick up the computers in the network if any malicious operation that is triggered."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform. It is very straightforward."

"The solution is efficient."

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

Cons

"The product's reporting isn't great."

"They need to improve their technical support services."

"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."

"It initially took some time to deploy."

"I feel it is a shame that I cannot create groups of groups with inheritance."

"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."

"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"The pricing is manageable."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

I do not have any ideas for improvement. It is a good solution, however, I am not an expert, so I do not have more ideas on this.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

I use N-able EDR for monitoring the devices of my company.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

The overall solution rating is seven out of ten. Scalability and integration could be improved, particularly with Microsoft tools.

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 27% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 40% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 29% of the time

ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR

Compared 13% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 10% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR

Compared 9% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

April 2025

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

No data available

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

N-able EDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities, ensuring system security and facilitating rapid incident response. Users highlight its effectiveness in detecting threats and appreciate its detailed reporting and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.

N-able EDR stands out with its robust threat detection, efficient endpoint protection, and comprehensive incident reporting. It offers constant monitoring and protection against malware and other cyber threats. Users find the configuration easy and appreciate the detailed alerts and analysis. With real-time monitoring and automated threat response, N-able EDR allows for high customization, contributing to enhanced security management. However, users suggest improvements in customization, reporting capabilities, scalability, and faster response times.

What are the standout features of N-able EDR?

Robust Threat Detection: Detects various cyber threats efficiently.
Simple System Configuration: Easy to set up and deploy.
Efficient Endpoint Protection: Provides continuous monitoring and protection.
Comprehensive Incident Reporting: Offers detailed reports and analysis.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT infrastructure.
Real-time Monitoring: Monitors systems in real-time.
Automated Threat Response: Responds to threats automatically.
High Customization: Offers customization options to suit security needs.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Improved Security: Enhanced threat detection and rapid response ensure systems stay secure.
Time Savings: Automated responses and easy configuration save time for IT teams.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive reports and alerts provide valuable security insights.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration with existing tools boosts operational efficiency.

N-able EDR is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it's crucial for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance. Healthcare entities utilize it for safeguarding patient information against breaches. Retailers rely on its robust protection to secure transactional data from cyber threats.

N-able

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. N-able EDR

April 2025

Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. N-able EDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. N-able EDR and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. N-able EDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.