Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Digital Guardian vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Fortra and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Fortra is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.4, while Trellix is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.6. Fortra holds a 0.6% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Digital Guardian
Read 11 Digital Guardian reviews
  • 1,313 Views
  • 844 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Read 53 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews
  • 4,559 Views
  • 3,454 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Digital Guardian and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) are leaders in endpoint security solutions. Based on user feedback, Trellix ENS seems to have the upper hand with its advanced threat detection and response capabilities, despite Digital Guardian's strong focus on data protection.

Features: Digital Guardian offers robust data loss prevention, granular control over data access, and a comprehensive compliance framework. Trellix ENS provides advanced threat detection, machine learning-based proactive defense, and extensive threat intelligence capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Digital Guardian could improve streamlined management tools, threat detection capabilities, and user interface intuitiveness. Trellix ENS needs better integration with third-party tools, simplification of complex configuration processes, and enhanced user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital Guardian is noted for a straightforward deployment process with solid customer support, albeit with a lengthy onboarding period. Trellix ENS receives mixed reviews on deployment complexity but is praised for responsive customer service and comprehensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Digital Guardian's pricing is competitive with notable ROI due to its effective data protection and compliance capabilities. Trellix ENS, while pricier, offers superior ROI through its extensive threat prevention and response functionalities, justifying the higher cost with advanced features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Digital Guardian vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Digital Guardian
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
31st
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (10th), Endpoint Encryption (8th), Mobile Data Protection (4th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (20th)
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Digital Guardian is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.1%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Sandeep Jopat - PeerSpot reviewer
Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available
Digital Guardian is generally considered stable, with its robust data loss prevention capabilities being highly valued by organizations. However, as with any complex software solution, there may be occasional challenges in terms of compatibility with certain operating systems or applications. In such cases, it may be necessary to modify settings or entries within Digital Guardian to ensure optimal performance. Overall, Digital Guardian is a stable solution that can be highly customized to meet the specific needs and requirements of organizations. As with any software solution, regular maintenance and support from a team of experts is necessary to ensure optimal performance and stability.
Read full review
Venugopal Potumudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data."
"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant."
"In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis."
"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."
"There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money."
"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."
"The technical support is really terrific."
"I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection."
More Digital Guardian pros
"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."
"It is a really strong solution for endpoint security."
"FireEye Endpoint Security is easy to use and lightweight compared to others."
"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The independent modules are very good."
"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros
 

Cons

"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."
"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."
"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."
"Digital Guardian is an excellent solution but our experience with the partner has been the most horrible experience we have ever had with any partner."
"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."
"If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility."
"When considering potential areas for improvement, it may be beneficial for Digital Guardian to optimize its processes and reduce the computational demands on the system, particularly with regard to high CPU usage. Although Digital Guardian offers numerous benefits, it can consume a substantial amount of RAM and CPU power."
"Technical support could be better."
More Digital Guardian cons
"It is a bit technical. The user interface has some significant limitations, mainly when using HIPS on the server side, to protect files from being changed or deleted by hackers, users, or administrators."
"I would like to see more automation."
"We'd like better UI on the management screen."
"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."
"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."
"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."
"The solution lacks device control."
"The complexity of advanced modules can be improved."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost was around $300,000."
"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."
"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."
"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."
"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."
"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
5%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Digital Guardian?
I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital Guardian?
Technical support is included in the subscription package. But if, during the subscription, our clients want to include the professional services of a Digital Guardian engineer, the price changes. ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?
If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.
See all answers
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian Logo
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian
Compared 28% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Digital Guardian Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Digital Guardian
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian
Compared 8% of the time
Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian Logo
Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian
Compared 7% of the time
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Digital Guardian Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Digital Guardian
Compared 3% of the time
More Digital Guardian Competitors
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 22% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 17% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 14% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 13% of the time
Elastic Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Elastic Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 2% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Digital Guardian
December 2024
Digital Guardian reportDownload Digital Guardian product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
November 2024
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Learn More

Fortra
Trellix
 

Overview

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response. 

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints. 

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

 

Sample Customers

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Buyer's Guide
Digital Guardian vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
December 2024
Free Report: Digital Guardian vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Digital Guardian vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.