Elastic Observability vs Nagios Core comparison

Elastic and Nagios are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Elastic is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9, while Nagios is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.1. Elastic holds a 4.3% mindshare in IM, compared to Nagios’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Elastic Observability

Read 24 Elastic Observability reviews

4,771 Views
4,135 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Read 50 Nagios Core reviews

5,214 Views
3,845 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Nagios Core and Elastic Observability compete in the IT monitoring category. Elastic Observability seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced centralized logging and integration capabilities.

Features: Nagios Core provides flexibility and customization options, an open-source platform with extensive plugins, and detailed alerting capabilities. Elastic Observability is noted for centralized logging, seamless integration with tools like Kibana, and end-to-end solutions for various data sources.

Room for Improvement: Nagios Core requires complex setups and advanced technical skills for effective use, sophisticated UI and reporting enhancements, and requires effort to improve infrastructure monitoring. Elastic Observability lacks predictive analytics, features a complex initial setup, and requires better visualization and additional monitoring features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nagios Core demands robust on-premises setups, relies mainly on community forums for support, and lacks official customer service. Elastic Observability supports hybrid and cloud deployment models, though it similarly depends on community-based assistance due to a lack of direct customer service for its open-source version.

Pricing and ROI: Nagios Core is cost-effective with no licensing fees, appealing to budget-conscious users, and offers high ROI by reducing downtime. Elastic Observability involves complex licensing based on data and infrastructure, may be costly for small businesses, but remains valuable for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive monitoring and insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), Log Management (13th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)

Nagios Core

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 4.3%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.9%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Subramani K

Solution Architect at HCL Technologies

Jun 27, 2022

The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed.

So Elastic is basically clusters, right? Basically three, we can go with the basic cluster is a three note cluster. So the implementation is quite simple. It's not very complex. So we have to architect the solution in such a way that we have the right number of replicas and right number of charts and all those to hold the data. So basically we have to architect based on the data ingestion, how much data we are going to ingest in the cluster. So this setup is pretty simple, but we have to have the right inputs, right decisions in place before we even implement it.

Read full review

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Oct 2, 2024

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

I use Nagios Core for monitoring purposes only. I have added enough extensions to the Nagios Core, and the company does not want to add any new features because whatever I have added is completely worth it. I have created Nagios Core projects to improve its functionality, and we use it to monitor…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its diverse set of features available on the cloud is of significant importance."

"It's easy to deploy, and it's very flexible."

"Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning over a month from multiple data sources can be completed within seconds."

"The most valuable feature of Elastic Observability is the text search."

"Good design and easy to use once implemented."

"For full stack observability, Elastic is the best tool compared with any other tool ."

"The price is very less expensive compared to the other solutions."

"Elastic provides built-in features for queries and report generation. It's a very good tool for monitoring integration capabilities."

More Elastic Observability pros

"The most valuable feature depends on the project. It's great if you need to check to ensure a service is running 24/7. I can use the full solution for free, and it's flexible. If I need to add a dashboard, I can integrate it with Nagios. Cloud synchronization is wonderful."

"I like the way the solution sends alerts and how it keeps on escalating them."

"Our customers like that Nagios Core is an open source solution. It can be customized to our customers' specific needs."

"The most valuable feature of Nagios Core is it allows us to develop and add as many plugins as we want."

"We mostly use Nagios Core to integrate with Python and Bash Script."

"The reporting structure and the feature set are valuable to me."

"Nagios monitors our servers, so we know if anything goes wrong and can solve the problem before it happens."

"The solution is quite efficient."

More Nagios Core pros

Cons

"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."

"The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. That's a big portion of it. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is cumbersome."

"Elastic Observability needs to improve the retrieval of logs and metrics from all the instances."

"There could be more low-code features included in the product."

"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful."

"Elastic Observability is difficult to use. There are only three options for customization but this can be difficult for our use case. We do not have other options to choose the metrics shown, such as CPU or memory usage."

"There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities."

"Improving code insight related to infrastructure and network, particularly focusing on aspects such as firewalls, switches, routers, and testing would be beneficial."

More Elastic Observability cons

"It would be nice if the company offered a sales or contract manager that was dedicated to our company so that we would have some sort of link to Nagios, and if we had issues or questions, we'd be able to contact them directly."

"I would like to see more training videos."

"Cloud monitoring is an area for improvement because there aren't too many plugins available."

"It is a bit slow due to latency."

"Nagios Core can improve the graphical interface, it would make things a little easier."

"The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak."

"Bandwidth monitoring is the pain point for me because Nagios Core does not monitor bandwidth effectively like Cacti does."

"Would benefit from aggregations if a particular server goes down."

More Nagios Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"The product is not that cheap."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

"The enterprise version has technical support. The version we are using is free."

"Most the plugin features are free."

"Nagios Core is an open source solution, and there are no licensing fees."

"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."

"Lessening the price point would be an improvement."

"We are using the free version."

"It's free."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability is cheaper in terms of pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

I don't know how Elastic can improve. The integration feature I am using is very easy to implement.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable a...

See all answers

Comparisons

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 17% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 15% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Elastic Observability

Compared 9% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 23% of the time

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 22% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 18% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 11% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core

Compared 5% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

November 2024

Download Elastic Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

October 2024

Download Nagios Core product report

Learn More

Elastic

Nagios

Overview

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core

October 2024

Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.