F5 Silverline Managed Services vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway comparison

"The most valuable feature of F5 Silverline Managed Services is the benchmark performance."

"It's a good front end for public infrastructure"

"The most valuable feature of F5 Silverline Managed Services is its cloud-native functionality and the high level of protection it provides."

"The product’s UI is easy to understand."

"The most valuable feature is flexibility."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"The most valuable features are the configuration and configuring the process."

"The solution's integration is very good."

"I rate Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has more than 1000 users who use it daily."

"Good customization; able to report and take action on alerts."

"The solution integrates different applications and APIs securely, enhancing overall security and network optimization."

"This is a SaaS product, so it is always up to date."

"We can control what rules should be used and what should be disabled."

"The pricing is quite good."

"The solution is easy to set up."

"We'd like more AI to be used. Right now, they don't use it enough."

"F5 Silverline Managed Services can improve by reducing the price."

"The price of F5 Silverline Managed Services could be better."

"The navigation is difficult to use."

"F5 Silverline Managed Services can improve by adding features that Palo Alto has."

"In terms of the scalability, this part is always so confusing because they are checking for packet count. Also, after an attack, they said that the throughput must be from gigabits but then I check my bandwidth and it is already done in gigabits. So it is a little bit confusing."

"You need to have Linux knowledge in order to use the shell."

"I just hope the price can be cheaper."

"The solution doesn’t support wildcard-based and regular expression-based rules."

"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could improve by allowing features to use more third-party tools."

"Microsoft needs to work on their documentation."

"We faced some downtime while validating CNAME."

"I want the solution's support to improve. The tool is also expensive."

"One of the challenges we faced was the solution does not support any other PCP protocols apart from HTTP and HTTPS."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is harder to manage than Imperva. It is not intuitive and stable compared to other products."

"The price of F5 Silverline Managed Services could be reduced."

"The product’s pricing is reasonable."

"The price of F5 Silverline Managed Services could be better, they are not very flexible. The price of the solution is based on the requirements of the enterprise."

"F5 Silverline Web Application Firewall works based on your bandwidth. They look at the clean bandwidth and do the pricing. 20% of a total pipe would be a clean bandwidth. The list price or a non-negotiated price for F5 Silverline Web Application Firewall would be around $2,200 per application per year for everything that you need. When you get into an enterprise kind of a setup, they negotiate this to the last bit. I would easily take 20% on that, which would be the cost, but it should cover all your Advance WAF features, bot protection, tech campaign, etc. It is built as a package and gives you most of the capability. You don't get the mobile SDK, which is an additional license. Mobile SDK is required only if you're buying or if you have a mobile application, and you are going to instrument F5 or Imperva into your mobile appliance. This anyways would be an additional module. It doesn't come within the WAF, but it is a WAF feature."

"It is not expensive."

"Between v1 and v2, there is a lot of change in the pricing. It is very costly compared to AWS."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is expensive."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has less price than other application gateway solutions."

"We use the tool's basic subscription. Its licensing costs are monthly."

"The tool's pricing model is pay-as-you-go."

"There is some additional cost, such as extended support."

"The pricing is based on how much you use the solution."