Fivetran vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Fivetran and Salesforce are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8, while Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Fivetran holds a 5.6% mindshare in CDI, compared to Salesforce’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 24 Fivetran reviews

2,370 Views
1,642 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 55 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

4,049 Views
2,571 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Fivetran

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2024

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Fivetran are integration tools. MuleSoft seems to have the upper hand in complex integration scenarios, while Fivetran is favored for simpler data tasks.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers robust API management, versatile integration capabilities, and a comprehensive feature set. Fivetran provides automated data pipeline features, simplicity, and efficiency in data integration tasks.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft needs improvements in ease of use, reduction of complexity, and better user interface design. Fivetran requires more customization options, improved support for additional data sources, and better documentation for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform’s deployment is intricate and time-consuming, requiring technical expertise; it receives mixed reviews for customer service. Fivetran is praised for quick and straightforward deployment and frequently positive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform tends to have higher setup costs but results in higher ROI for complex scenarios. Fivetran is more cost-effective upfront and provides solid ROI for straightforward data integration projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (13th), Data Replication (3rd)

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (9th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 5.6%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 9.1%, up from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Erik Jones

Head of BI and Analytics at HyperScience

Nov 14, 2022

Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI

Fivetran has room for improvement in data pipeline observability. The Fivetran logs are fairly basic, compared to, for example, the insight Fivetran gives into helping users understanding the performance of data pipelines. So I think their observability into the pipeline itself could be improved. In addition, Fivetran is in the very early stages of allowing other companies to access its metadata API, but that's something that could use improvement, and I know that they're working on right now. We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool. It would be nice if Fivetran offered both their regular offering plus the reverse ETL option as well.

Read full review

Corydon Hinton

Principal Systems Engineer at Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc.

Mar 19, 2024

Can seamlessly translate protocols and produce fairly quick results

Using the solution was great. It was part of the project that we didn't worry that much about. What I also liked about it was that even though I'm not that technical, I could go in and look at thoughts and events and confirm that the information we were looking for was making it across. I could check at the interface level and lessen the burden on validation within the application. The instrumentation within the solution is important. The ease of implementation is very important. Our partner development team had little trouble dealing with these diverse systems, with JSON on the one hand and SOAP on the other. The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great. The API-led connectivity is great. The reason that we took on the product was that we wanted to learn about it. We wanted to figure out how to use it. A big payoff for this will be in EHR integrations. These systems are all alike, yet they are all different. They all use EPIC, and each installation is a little bit different. It’s a challenge when we go to different hospitals. MuleSoft has made a name for itself in using the integrations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Fivetran offers native connectivity with Sybase"

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."

"The solution is stable. We've never faced any stability issues."

"Fivetran can perform data migration incredibly fast, depending on the source and target."

"The simplicity and scalability are the strongest features of Fivetran."

"There's the general feature of the platform where it just makes it very easy to integrate different things, but I would say a specific difference is their integration of DBT,."

"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."

"It is not like a traditional ETL, but it gives quite a lot of flexibility."

More Fivetran pros

"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."

"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."

"The solution is very scalable with solid performance and the capability of extending it using any custom Java in case you don't have anything out of the box. MDP is strong. It is good compared to other products regarding its capabilities in managing or orchestrating the issue load."

"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."

"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."

"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."

"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."

"The flexibility has been great overall."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly."

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

"HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed."

"Fivetran would be improved by adding the ability to integrate the data from third-party APIs."

"The biggest area for improvement is in customization, particularly in how Fivetran socializes its tools."

"This solution needs to improve its real-time data and transformation availability."

"An in-line data quality checking capability is missing"

More Fivetran cons

"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."

"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."

"There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."

"The price could be improved."

"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."

"Information on monitoring could be improved."

"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."

"The tool requires programming language."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"The solution is affordable."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"The solution has a high price."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"Regarding pricing, I believe there could be room for improvement to align with user expectations."

"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."

"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

27%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 12% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 9% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs Fivetran

Compared 3% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon SQS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Composer vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

November 2024

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

October 2024

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Learn More

Fivetran

Salesforce

Overview

Fivetran is a data integration and migration solution that centralizes data from various sources into a data warehouse (such as Snowflake or BigQuery) for analytics. Its most valuable features include replication and managed pipelines, integration with DBT for data transformation, and many source connections.

Fivetran is easy to use, with fast data migration and an intuitive portal for easy setup and troubleshooting. It has helped organizations integrate and manage data, saving time and resources.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Sample Customers

DocuSign, Oldcastle Infrastructure, Crossmedia, Talkdesk, Chubbies, Brandwatch

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

October 2024

Free Report: Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.