Fivetran vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Fivetran and Salesforce are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8, while Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1. Fivetran holds a 5.7% mindshare in CDI, compared to Salesforce’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 25 Fivetran reviews

1,822 Views
1,315 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 57 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

2,956 Views
1,925 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Fivetran

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Fivetran are both key players in the integration space. With its comprehensive features, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform seems to have the upper hand for complex integrations, while Fivetran's simplicity suits quick data synchronization.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is recognized for API management, scalability, and ease of integration with platforms like Salesforce and SAP. It offers over 200 standard connectors and a unified API management platform. Fivetran excels in data replication, pipeline management, and minimizing coding requirements, providing easy platform integration.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft faces issues with pricing, runtime management, and technical support. Users report difficulties in initial setups and inadequate documentation. Fivetran needs enhanced observability, detailed logs, and better real-time data processing flexibility, along with more connector and transformation customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform supports diverse deployments, including on-premises, private, and hybrid clouds, with varied customer service dependent on community support. Fivetran is cloud-centric, emphasizing rapid implementation and boasts responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Both platforms are costly, but MuleSoft's pricing model is complex and based on processing volumes. Fivetran operates on a usage-based model, offering scalability benefits but can become expensive with increased data rows. MuleSoft is often seen as high cost with significant ROI for complex integrations, while Fivetran shows strong ROI through efficient scaling.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,485 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (12th), Data Replication (3rd)

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 5.7%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 6.7%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Erik Jones

Head of BI and Analytics at HyperScience

Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI

Fivetran has room for improvement in data pipeline observability. The Fivetran logs are fairly basic, compared to, for example, the insight Fivetran gives into helping users understanding the performance of data pipelines. So I think their observability into the pipeline itself could be improved. In addition, Fivetran is in the very early stages of allowing other companies to access its metadata API, but that's something that could use improvement, and I know that they're working on right now. We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool. It would be nice if Fivetran offered both their regular offering plus the reverse ETL option as well.

Read full review

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"Fivetran is remarkably easy to use; I haven't encountered any other data integration tool that is as user-friendly."

"There's the general feature of the platform where it just makes it very easy to integrate different things, but I would say a specific difference is their integration of DBT,."

"It is easy for users to get accustomed to the tool due to its gentle learning curve and clear error transparency."

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"Fivetran offers native connectivity with Sybase"

"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's very easy and quick to set up. It also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface. For GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything."

"Its arrays are powerful enough to handle migrations even when the replication is happening in the background, without causing any trouble with the ongoing traffic."

More Fivetran pros

"This is the easiest and best tool available."

"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."

"The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API."

"The flexibility has been great overall."

"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."

"API management."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."

"The product is very user-friendly."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"More connectors are needed for exotic, popular, and rising star portals."

"Fivetran is very expensive for data sources with a lot of rows, such as email data. I would like to see cheaper pricing for data sources like that."

"We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"There is not a lot of options to customize the pipeline, and the cost is high."

"The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly."

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

More Fivetran cons

"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."

"It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved."

"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."

"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."

"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."

"From a monitoring point of view, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform can improve on tracking transactions. When dealing with multiple transactions or trading, the system can lose control, and tracking becomes hectic."

"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."

"The product is expensive."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"Regarding pricing, I believe there could be room for improvement to align with user expectations."

"The product is still very expensive."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

27%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

23%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 14% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 7% of the time

Workato vs Fivetran

Compared 2% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

March 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.