Flatcar Container Linux vs SUSE Linux Enterprise comparison

"Flatcar's support is good. The version I am using is stable and allows us to make needed changes."

"It is very easy to maintain, migrate and upgrade."

"It is a stable platform."

"The most valuable features of the solution are patching and the BTRFS file system."

"From a functionality perspective, the suite is quite rich. We like that."

"The initial setup for most modern Linux distributions is normally straightforward. Most of the common distributions use an ncurses or GUI install."

"It also was very easy to setup, and offered an easy to use advanced setup option as well. This helped to create special configurations for different use cases."

"I like how the tool handles kernel modules and upgrades - we rarely have issues after upgrades, unlike with other Linux distributions like Oracle Linux or Ubuntu. The kernel module management is excellent. Changes made in one version typically work the same in other versions too, which isn't always the case with other distributions. There's also lots of information and community support available if you run into any problems, both on the official website and in forums and user groups. I know many people who use it specifically, so it's easy to get independent support if needed. I've been working with the tool for a long time, since 2003, before they became SUSE Linux Enterprise. It's always been one of the most admin-friendly Linux versions."

"The operating system is efficient in terms of security."

"The development teams could sharpen their skills. They should offer applications on the net."

"The free version sometimes has security holes."

"We previously had trouble integrating Autodesk with the SUSE Manager, but the issue was resolved."

"Additionally, error handling needs improvement. The system should be more transparent when there's an error, rather than just declaring a generic error. It would be helpful if it could provide more specific information about the problem on that particular system. As it stands, you can waste a lot of time trying to troubleshoot these vague errors."

"The solution is expensive."

"If you want to do something simple like changing an IP number, you have to be quite aware of all the configuration files where you will change that."

"We have had trouble integrating Autodesk with the SUSE manager."

"The only stability issues that I can recall encountering with SUSE would be with KDE. However, that is limited to just the desktop environment as I have not had stability issues with ​most server functions."

"The solution could be more stable."

"The tool is expensive compared to Red Hat. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"The price is reasonable."

"As far as licensing goes, there is nothing unusual here. The price and model have worked fine for my organization."

"I have to pay for a license in order to get support."

"I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"The price of SUSE Linux Enterprise could be cheaper. Other solutions, such as"

"When we first implemented this product, we had licenses for support."

"The license we pay is for Oracle. We make use of the community edition."