Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) vs Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FortiGate Next Generation F...
Ranking in ZTNA
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (11th), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (9th)
Google Cloud Platform Cloud...
Ranking in ZTNA
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the ZTNA category, the mindshare of FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) is 4.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is 2.8%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ZTNA
 

Featured Reviews

MOHAN SUKUMAR - PeerSpot reviewer
User-based policies improve network security but integration complexity persists
The main area needing improvement is the user-friendliness of FortiGate's integration with other Fortinet tools like FortiAuthenticator and VPN services. Configuring these services is quite complex and not very user-friendly, requiring technical steps that are difficult for normal users to understand. Fortinet support's resolution of issues is slow, and the research on making the solution user-friendly needs to progress further.
Kodanda Ramji C.S - PeerSpot reviewer
Involves an initial setup phase that is straightforward in nature
My company evaluates whether the product is capable of fulfilling the requirements of our customers, and we may even do it with the other OEM tools in the market. Based on the use cases given to my company by its customers, we evaluate whether Azure, AWS, or GCP can be helpful. Among the three cloud options, the ones that are able to fulfill our company's customers' requirements will be evaluated, and their report will be submitted to the manager. Based on the costing part, customers can decide which OEM tool would be the best for them. My company does technical and financial evaluation of the products. As there were no operational changes and only initial implementation was required, which was a part of the PoC phase, there wasn't much of an impact on the user experience. All the three service providers, like GCP, Azure and AWS are used to meet the same requirements. I would say that the same benefits are made available to users by all the service providers. The differentiation part can be considered only on the basis of the costs. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has a user-friendly interface."
"The most valuable feature of FortiGate Next Generation Firewall is its SD-WAN."
"The usability of the solution is its best feature."
"The firewall and VPN features are the most valuable in protecting our customers' networks."
"The tool's most valuable feature is IPS. In my experience, I haven't encountered any issues with integration. It easily integrates with the FortiGate solution. However, verifying through documentation and assessing their support is necessary."
"The most valuable features of the FortiGate firewall include SSL inspection, VPN functionality, and threat intelligence features for preventing threats."
"FortiGate Next Generation Firewall has IBS/IPS systems"
"The solution is secure."
"The solution has many features for stability and security."
"UI representation is the aspect I like the most about GCP, even more than Azure or AWS."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The platform’s most valuable features include storage, machine, and cloud functionality."
"I can access the information whenever I want. It's integration is easy. The tool's GUI is easy to use with an IT background. The value benefits of using it include the ability to avoid storing data on local machines, reducing the risk of data loss"
"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Platform are the Kubernetes engine, CI/CD, and BigQuery."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is an easy-to-use solution."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a scalable solution."
 

Cons

"The solution should allow more user-friendly integrations or deployment"
"One of the weaknesses of the solution is something we noticed, especially after comparing the tool with SD-WAN features, since, unfortunately, in a massive scale size environment, the solution is not good. I"
"Its load balancing feature could be easy to configure."
"The solution needs to integrate VPN features."
"Improvements could be made when companies expand and need better equipment and more licenses."
"Technical support is not helpful."
"The performance can be improved."
"There should be more testing before releasing software since it can be a little buggy sometimes when new features come out after updates."
"The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy could be more user-friendly and less expensive."
"The solution should have better integration."
"We encounter issues while setting up emails for the solution."
"Google Cloud Platform is not a product that is very flexible for end-users, especially owing to the fact that there is not much documentation available for the product."
"The solution is a bit complex and could be made easier to use."
"The initial setup was quite complex."
"The integration of the solution for patching, updating, and installing the updates could be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In my opinion, the pricing of the product is reasonable."
"We pay $500 per year for the license."
"I rate FortiGate Next Generation Firewall a five out of ten for pricing."
"The product is not very expensive."
"The solution is more expensive than Sophos. It could be cheaper. The licensing is on a yearly basis. We have had it for about three years. We must only pay extra for the license, additional requirements, and the hardware box."
"FortiGate Next Generation Firewall is an expensive solution."
"I think price-wise, the solution is totally reasonable since it has many products to serve, starting from small homes to massive scale sites."
"FortiGate Next Generation Firewall is an expensive solution with a yearly subscription."
"Google Cloud Platform is cheaper than Microsoft Exchange."
"It is expensive to scale up the solution."
"My organization makes yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the tool."
"There is a need to make yearly payments toward the solution's licensing."
"The monthly payments made towards the licensing cost of the solution are not expensive."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is an expensive solution."
"Its price is good. For each server, we are saving $300 a month. We have at least thousands of servers. It is a huge cost reduction for us."
"The price of the product falls on the cheaper side of the spectrum."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW)?
The tool's most valuable feature is IPS. In my experience, I haven't encountered any issues with integration. It easily integrates with the FortiGate solution. However, verifying through documentat...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW)?
The pricing of the FortiGate firewall is good. It offers cost savings as it is generally cheaper than the competition.
What needs improvement with FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW)?
There should be more testing before releasing software since it can be a little buggy sometimes when new features come out after updates.
What do you like most about Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy?
I can access the information whenever I want. It's integration is easy. The tool's GUI is easy to use with an IT background. The value benefits of using it include the ability to avoid storing data...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy?
There are different pricing plans depending on data volumes and services, but it's comparable to other providers. The value and benefits depend on what we're developing and the specific use case.
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy?
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy should improve stability.
 

Also Known As

No data available
GCP Cloud IAP, Google Cloud Platform Cloud IAP, Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.